>Myself at 100K is the limit. But as I drive so few miles on all three autos
>and trucks I don't feel it would ever become a problem.
The Voyager has a timing chain, not a belt. The only curious belt they had
was an unbelievably ill-advised belt that ran the oil pump in one of the
4-cylinder engines used in some of the very early Voyagers (mid-80's).
Getting to it required an overhaul, and at some point, every one of them
would and did break.
As for your Sedona, 102K is the longest I've ever heard anyone going with a
Sedona. But it's like I said - at some point, my paranoia would take over
with an interference engine. But that does tell me that, once mine is out
of warranty, I may try 90 to 105K.
Who knows - maybe I'm just paranoid, period, and broken timing belts on
interference engines have nothing to do with it.
Tom Wenndt
>>Myself at 100K is the limit. But as I drive so few miles on all three
>>autos
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> -- Christian
Christian M. Mericle - 12 May 2006 18:59 GMT
> The Voyager has a timing chain, not a belt.
Some Voyagers may use a timing chain but the '96 2.4 definitely uses a
belt.
> As for your Sedona, 102K is the longest I've ever heard anyone going with a
> Sedona. But it's like I said - at some point, my paranoia would take over
> with an interference engine. But that does tell me that, once mine is out
> of warranty, I may try 90 to 105K.
I didn't acquire my Sedona until it already had 92K on it. I'm assuming
that the timing belt was changed at 60K. But, in the absence of service
records, I hope that assumption doesn't turn out to be fatal.
> Who knows - maybe I'm just paranoid, period, and broken timing belts on
> interference engines have nothing to do with it.
Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you.
{;o)
-- Christian
> >>Myself at 100K is the limit. But as I drive so few miles on all three
> >>autos
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> >
> > -- Christian