>My money is on the head gasket, look for steam cleaned spark plugs. You
>could get a sniffer kit to test the coolant but to be honest It sounds like
>head off time. Rattle I guess is a lazy lifter (thats not an insult!) change
>the cam while you have it all stripped down, set of new lifters, new gasket
>and also worth getting the valves looked at too if they are owt like Morphs
>were.
I didnt need any money left in my bank account anyway! ;) (roughly how
much did it cost for you to do Morph?)
how does a lifter get lazy? (and additionally is a lifter another name
for a cam follower? - i've never had a v8 apart before? and my saabs
are OHC). is it more likely to be that than just a valve out of
adjustment?
Is it a 3.9 cam i want to fit instead of the original to give it a few
more donkeys or am i confused? Can i get the cam out without removing
the rad too?
Additionally - am i mistaken in thinking that the 101 v8 is lower
compression than the v8 was in other applications? - how is the
compression ratio changed? is it done by the pistons, heads or
gaskets? - just wondering if i can change this while it is apart too?
>Hopefully you will get the manifolds off ok but be prepared for knackered
>threads in the heads.
Funily enough i've got to go buy a helicoil kit to do one of the
manifold mounting holes in the head on my saab too.
>I HATE 101 Carb's thats got to be the worst part of the whole job.
might go to halfrods thismorning and buy myself a set of those stubby
spanners!
>Of course it may be quicker to throw in a 4.6 lump.
>
>Nah, you'd never get it in ;-)
I was very close to buying a p38 for the engine but then everybody
convinced me it would be too hard to get all the efi stuff off and
that there was a lot of electrics to deal with. I'd like to stay with
simple carbs on the 101 i think..
Though if anybody has a 4.6 lying about which they want rid of then
let me know!
Elder - 24 Mar 2007 10:04 GMT
> how does a lifter get lazy? (and additionally is a lifter another name
> for a cam follower? - i've never had a v8 apart before? and my saabs
> are OHC). is it more likely to be that than just a valve out of
> adjustment?
If the lifter is hydraulic like in a Saab twin cam engine, they pump up
with oil when you start the car to take up any valve slack. They hold
some oil, but as they age they sometimes leak back. Then, then can
rattle for a few minutes until fully pressurised. Once "buggered" they
won't pump up and hold oil, so they rattle longer or even all the time.
Are RR V8 engines tappet and either screw or shim adjust, or are they
hydraulic tappets?

Signature
Carl Robson
Audio stream: http://www.bouncing-czechs.com:8000/samtest
Homepage: http://www.bouncing-czechs.com
Tom Woods - 24 Mar 2007 10:11 GMT
>> how does a lifter get lazy? (and additionally is a lifter another name
>> for a cam follower? - i've never had a v8 apart before? and my saabs
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>rattle for a few minutes until fully pressurised. Once "buggered" they
>won't pump up and hold oil, so they rattle longer or even all the time.
I'm not even up to saab twin cam yet! ;) I'm on single cam 8v engines.
My saab valves are adjusted using shims. I can cope with that!
>Are RR V8 engines tappet and either screw or shim adjust, or are they
>hydraulic tappets?
I had assumed they were tappet and screw like all the series engines
but what you say about the lifters makes sense.
Elder - 24 Mar 2007 10:59 GMT
> I'm not even up to saab twin cam yet! ;) I'm on single cam 8v engines.
Ah, the Ricardo design. Nice engine, but the bucket and shim adjust is
annoying. Are there any any triumph parts that swap over? It was
essentially the same engine as that fitted to dolomites, but with the
transmission replacing the sump, and the engine fitted back to front.

Signature
Carl Robson
Audio stream: http://www.bouncing-czechs.com:8000/samtest
Homepage: http://www.bouncing-czechs.com
Dougal - 24 Mar 2007 12:13 GMT
>>>how does a lifter get lazy? (and additionally is a lifter another name
>>>for a cam follower? - i've never had a v8 apart before? and my saabs
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> I had assumed they were tappet and screw like all the series engines
> but what you say about the lifters makes sense.
They're hydraulic -
... and if the little valve plate (washer) breaks you end up with
quarter of an inch or so of rocker clearance as the lifter doesn't
pump up at all. It makes an awful noise!
Tom Woods - 24 Mar 2007 12:18 GMT
>> I had assumed they were tappet and screw like all the series engines
>> but what you say about the lifters makes sense.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>quarter of an inch or so of rocker clearance as the lifter doesn't
>pump up at all. It makes an awful noise!
That makes sense. its not making an awful noise, just a ticking.
Ive found some pictures of them now (they are not covered in my 90/110
manual atall like they dont exist!)
They are listed as hydraulic cam followers in some places so my
thinking isnt totally wrong!
>Of course it may be quicker to throw in a 4.6 lump.
>
>Nah, you'd never get it in ;-)
http://tinyurl.com/2ovkvo
bit pricey for me but i bet the truck would go nicely with that in
there!