>>>>> damp squid...
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
> major impact on 'saving the day'.
> Richard
>> The estimate for Suffolk is the sea level ended up about 20cms from
>> causing a major disaster. I am not sure if that is a big safety
>> margin or not ........
Wot's that in English? ... 7 3/4" As these things go I thinks quite a bit,
yes you'll get waves sloshing over the top but even quite a number large
waves comeing over anre not going to transport anything like the amount of
water that being just 1/2" over the top will.
> I think all the right things were done tbh for all the right reasons. In
> contrast to our american friends experience a short while back. Either
> way they were dammed pretty much as if it had of gone fill tilt there
> would be a load of peeps no doubt saying enough wasn't done.
Agreed. The authorities are caught between a rock and hard place. The
prospect of a large tidal surge was forecast way back on Sunday. It didn't
appear in the mass hsyteria, sorry media, until the day before the time of
arrival. With the forecast indicating that the defences might be over
whelmed the authorities has no choice but to evacuate those likley to be
flooded should the defenses be over topped or, much, much, worse fail.
Of course the media were peed off as the story didn't turn out, luckly, to
be a disaster.

Signature
Cheers new5pam@howhill.com
Dave. pam is missing e-mail
Adrian Simpson - 11 Nov 2007 11:52 GMT
>>> The estimate for Suffolk is the sea level ended up about 20cms from
>>> causing a major disaster. I am not sure if that is a big safety
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>waves comeing over anre not going to transport anything like the amount of
>water that being just 1/2" over the top will.
It's all down to the timing. The surge moved down the North Sea a bit
slower than expected, so by the time that it arrived the tidal levels
were already dropping, had it coincided with high water (or the air
pressure been lower) it could have been rather messier than it was.
Adrian

Signature
To Reply :
replace "news" with "adrian" and "nospam" with "ffoil"
Sorry for the rigmarole, If I want spam, I'll go to the shops
Every time someone says "I don't believe in trolls", another one dies.
Cheshire Steve - 12 Nov 2007 20:36 GMT
> In article <nyyfbegfubjuvyypbz.jrbp1r0.pmin...@srv1.howhill.net>, Dave
> Liquorice <new5...@howhill.com> writes
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> Sorry for the rigmarole, If I want spam, I'll go to the shops
> Every time someone says "I don't believe in trolls", another one dies.
Yup, I reckon you are dead right - the timing was a little out and
saved the day. As far as I can see all the actions taken were correct
and appropriate. Sadly the timing wasn't out for the BBC, if only
there had been a feud on Big Brother, or maybe a footballer had hurt
his foot, or a celebrity divorce, or infedility in the government -
but with no juicy gossip they decided to try and escalate it into a
major panic - and they didn't even make a good job of that. I was
surprised when they read out an e-mail from a woman having trouble to
get through to the flood hotline - from Bolton ! Now THAT would be a
high tide - or is there another Bolton on the East Coast that I have
never come across ? In which case apologies (again).
Steve
Adrian Simpson - 12 Nov 2007 21:05 GMT
>> It's all down to the timing. The surge moved down the North Sea a bit
>> slower than expected, so by the time that it arrived the tidal levels
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>high tide - or is there another Bolton on the East Coast that I have
>never come across ? In which case apologies (again).
There are a couple near the East coast, one to east of Edinburgh and one
near Alnwick, but both are far enough inland to have kept their feet dry
even with the sort of surge forecast last week.
Adrian

Signature
To Reply :
replace "news" with "adrian" and "nospam" with "ffoil"
Sorry for the rigmarole, If I want spam, I'll go to the shops
Every time someone says "I don't believe in trolls", another one dies.