>The 205R16 MTs I have sitting here are rated at 108 - 2000 kg per axle.
> The ATs on my neighbour's vehicle are rated at 110 - 2120kg per axle.
> I don't see the issue you raise as valid Dougal.
worth checking the tyres though, it doubtless depends on which tyre.
205R16 are undersized on the 110, though, and not a recommended fitment, and
may cause inaccurate speedo readings as well.

Signature
Austin Shackles. www.ddol-las.net my opinions are just that
Travel The Galaxy! Meet Fascinating Life Forms...
------------------------------------------------\
>> http://www.schlockmercenary.com/ << \ ...and Kill them.
a webcartoon by Howard Tayler; I like it, maybe you will too!
EMB - 11 Nov 2007 08:30 GMT
>> The 205R16 MTs I have sitting here are rated at 108 - 2000 kg per axle.
>> The ATs on my neighbour's vehicle are rated at 110 - 2120kg per axle.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> 205R16 are undersized on the 110, though, and not a recommended fitment, and
> may cause inaccurate speedo readings as well.
I know, but given that the vehicle in question is a 2.5NA Diseasel 110
it's probably intentional so that it has some semblence of acceleration.
srtgray - 11 Nov 2007 13:11 GMT
> >> The 205R16 MTs I have sitting here are rated at 108 - 2000 kg per axle.
> >> The ATs on my neighbour's vehicle are rated at 110 - 2120kg per axle.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> I know, but given that the vehicle in question is a 2.5NA Diseasel 110
> it's probably intentional so that it has some semblence of acceleration.
But worse top end speed. Plus Land-Rover do NOT sanction their
fitment, and in the event of a crash, the insurance are going to use
this as an excuse not to pay up.
Stuart
EMB - 11 Nov 2007 18:58 GMT
> But worse top end speed. Plus Land-Rover do NOT sanction their
> fitment, and in the event of a crash, the insurance are going to use
> this as an excuse not to pay up.
Do LR sanction any of the other alternative sizes that are commonly used
eg 31/10.5R15?
Austin Shackles - 11 Nov 2007 21:13 GMT
>> But worse top end speed. Plus Land-Rover do NOT sanction their
>> fitment, and in the event of a crash, the insurance are going to use
>> this as an excuse not to pay up.
>
>Do LR sanction any of the other alternative sizes that are commonly used
>eg 31/10.5R15?
dunno, but 2 wrongs don't make a right. To fit 13/10.5R15 requires
non-standard wheels, which is another point - although if the wheels and
tyres are sold for a LR then they should be suitable for the purpose.

Signature
Austin Shackles. www.ddol-las.net my opinions are just that
Travel The Galaxy! Meet Fascinating Life Forms...
------------------------------------------------\
>> http://www.schlockmercenary.com/ << \ ...and Kill them.
a webcartoon by Howard Tayler; I like it, maybe you will too!
Austin Shackles - 12 Nov 2007 07:14 GMT
> To fit 13/10.5R15 requires
although that would be a clever bit of tyre manufacture. should be 31 of
course.

Signature
Austin Shackles. www.ddol-las.net my opinions are just that
Travel The Galaxy! Meet Fascinating Life Forms...
------------------------------------------------\
>> http://www.schlockmercenary.com/ << \ ...and Kill them.
a webcartoon by Howard Tayler; I like it, maybe you will too!
hugh - 12 Nov 2007 18:27 GMT
>>The 205R16 MTs I have sitting here are rated at 108 - 2000 kg per axle.
>> The ATs on my neighbour's vehicle are rated at 110 - 2120kg per axle.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>205R16 are undersized on the 110, though, and not a recommended fitment, and
>may cause inaccurate speedo readings as well.
They were only fitted on 90s Speedo reading will be fast - so at least
that is on the side of caution.

Signature
hugh
Reply to address is valid at the time of posting
>>> I have 205 r 16 tyres fitted to my 1986 2.5 N/A Diesel 110 12 seater,
>>> the
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> The ATs on my neighbour's vehicle are rated at 110 - 2120kg per axle.
> I don't see the issue you raise as valid Dougal.
Can't disagree if they are rated as you quote. The common ones in the UK
are not.
EMB - 11 Nov 2007 09:44 GMT
> Can't disagree if they are rated as you quote. The common ones in the UK
> are not.
That's interesting as neither set was purchased as anything other than
"ordinary" tyres in 205R16 for fitment to a SWB Series.