> What's the net consensus on the LR2? I test drove one recently and it
> really
> wasn't that toy-ish (as the LR3) as I expected.
>
> Just curious what everyone thought.
Very good motor, tons better than the previous Freelander. Auto box is
brilliant and a must for off-road (no low range), ground clearance still
lets it down and a few early cars had problems with clutch hydraulics but
all seems well now.
Try here for loads of info www.Freel2.net
Andy
<<Disco 3 TDV6>>
Frank D. Greco - 14 Nov 2007 20:07 GMT
"Andy" <andrew.cooke4@btinternet.com> sez:
>> What's the net consensus on the LR2? I test drove one recently and it
>> really
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>Try here for loads of info www.Freel2.net
Thanks Andy. Any idea how you can tell if an LR2 is indeed
one of the early ones?
Btw, that website doesn't appear to work. That's "free" with an "LR2",
right?
F
Stuart Gray - 14 Nov 2007 20:18 GMT
> "Andy" <andrew.cooke4@btinternet.com> sez:
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> F
No, just free L2 (no R)
Stuart
Dougal - 14 Nov 2007 20:36 GMT
>> "Andy" <andrew.cooke4@btinternet.com> sez:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> Stuart
www.freel2.com ?
Andy - 14 Nov 2007 22:56 GMT
>>> "Andy" <andrew.cooke4@btinternet.com> sez:
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> www.freel2.com ?
Doh!!!!! What an arse I am, should have been www.Freel2.com thanks Dougal
Andy
Frank D. Greco - 14 Nov 2007 23:43 GMT
>> www.freel2.com ?
Ah... that's it. Thanks Stuart and Dougal!
And of course thanks Andy. Twas only a minor typo... :)
F