Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Land Rover Cars / January 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Land Rover going Indian ?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Cheshire Steve - 03 Jan 2008 23:49 GMT
Just heard that the Indian company Tata is talking about buying Jaguar
and Land Rover from Ford !

See New York Times http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/04/business/worldbusiness/03cnd-tata.html?hp

Doesn't seem right to me ... not at all.

Steve
Steve Taylor - 03 Jan 2008 23:58 GMT
> Just heard that the Indian company Tata is talking about buying Jaguar
> and Land Rover from Ford !

Pay attention at the back. This has been discussed here very very recently.

Steve
Cheshire Steve - 04 Jan 2008 00:03 GMT
> > Just heard that the Indian company Tata is talking about buying Jaguar
> > and Land Rover from Ford !
>
> Pay attention at the back. This has been discussed here very very recently.
>
> Steve

Has it ? All I could see was pages of garbage by some sort of spammer.

So I suppose all the Ta-Ta and old Tat jokes have already been
done !!!

Steve
Steve Taylor - 04 Jan 2008 00:14 GMT
> So I suppose all the Ta-Ta and old Tat jokes have already been
> done !!!

Hmm, not sure ! Shall we start ?
tatered ?

Steve
Dave Liquorice - 04 Jan 2008 09:13 GMT
> Has it ? All I could see was pages of garbage by some sort of spammer.

Get yourself a decent news server and you won't see the spam(*). Google
groups is a heap of crock, even the archive is much harder to use than it
was.

(*) Well you might see one or three a week...

Signature

Cheers                                              new5pam@howhill.com
Dave.                                             pam is missing e-mail

David G. Bell - 04 Jan 2008 07:54 GMT
On Thursday, in article
    <2c00ec60-3a8d-4aff-9a6b-75c2dcf27093@l1g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>

> Just heard that the Indian company Tata is talking about buying Jaguar
> and Land Rover from Ford !
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Doesn't seem right to me ... not at all.

It's a rumour that has been going round for a long time.

And the NYT has, over the last few years, worked hard to get a
reputation for poor-quality reporting.

So I don't see much significance in this latest report, barely even a
confirmation that Tata are still interested, if they ever were.

Signature

David G. Bell -- SF Fan, Filker, and Punslinger.

On the horizon, a carrier task force of the Salvation Navy was
turning into the wind, preparing to launch Zeppelins.

Matt M - 04 Jan 2008 11:50 GMT
> It's a rumour that has been going round for a long time.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> So I don't see much significance in this latest report, barely even a
> confirmation that Tata are still interested, if they ever were.

Really? I've seen it widely reported that Tata are the preferred bidder,
and I'm sure I noticed yesterday that the Telegraph reported Ford were
now committing to further talks with Tata re. buying Jag / LR.

Matt
hugh - 04 Jan 2008 12:29 GMT
>> It's a rumour that has been going round for a long time.
>>  And the NYT has, over the last few years, worked hard to get a
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>Matt
In today's Guardian talks with TATA are continuing ,but no mention of
the other two bidders, the inference being that TATA are indeed the
preferred bidder.

So it's ta ta from me and ta ta from him, and ta ta Solihull
--
Ta ta
hugh
Reply to address is valid at the time of posting
Geo - 04 Jan 2008 14:18 GMT
> In message <G4pfj.30$pb5.50@nntpserver.swip.net>, Matt M
> <matthew.maddock@nospamplease.mmaddock.com> writes
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> So it's ta ta from me and ta ta from him, and ta ta Solihull

The Beeb says so too:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7169681.stm

Nicest pun I found was "Jaguar set for Indian takeout"

Geo
SteveG - 04 Jan 2008 23:02 GMT
> On Thursday, in article
>      <2c00ec60-3a8d-4aff-9a6b-75c2dcf27093@l1g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> So I don't see much significance in this latest report, barely even a
> confirmation that Tata are still interested, if they ever were.

There'll be no more complaints about the help desk being in Delhi :-)

Signature

Regards

Steve G

Larry - 04 Jan 2008 15:23 GMT
Yours maybe, but not mine which is the best of British (Leyland) which
explains a lot I suppose.

Actually Lambretta  (once a part of the BL empire believe it or not) went
Indian, Royal Enfield went Indian, Standard Vanguard went Indian. If the
Indians started building proper series landies again I wouldn't mind.

Goodness gracious me.

Signature

Larry

Series 3 Rust and Holes

> Just heard that the Indian company Tata is talking about buying Jaguar
> and Land Rover from Ford !
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Steve
Reinhard Swietli - 04 Jan 2008 22:27 GMT
Hi,

i am the proud owner of Disco II, which i bought trusting to the standards
a (real) british manufactorer will offer and execute to his customers !
After changings of the brand ( i.e. BMW, ... ) i am still a owner of a
LandRover !!!! After 2 days testdriving a Disco III i never would buy one
of this "High Tech" Cars ! Why ? : Probs with AWD, Computer, ... .  I am
driving a LandRover because the thing WORKS ! And i want ( need ) a car
that works ! In my opinion, a LR III is a merchandising machine, but far
away from a working vehicle ! So, hopefully, the "indian deal" will put
things better !

Kind regards and a happy new year
Reinhard

> Actually Lambretta  (once a part of the BL empire believe it or not)
> went Indian, Royal Enfield went Indian, Standard Vanguard went Indian.
> If the Indians started building proper series landies again I wouldn't
> mind.
>
> Goodness gracious me.
SteveG - 04 Jan 2008 23:01 GMT
> Yours maybe, but not mine which is the best of British (Leyland) which
> explains a lot I suppose.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Goodness gracious me.

Royal Enfield set-up their own factory in India back in the late 60's,
which remained in their ownership until RE were bought by Norton in the
early 70's. The Indian factory used to build bikes from complete
knocked-down kits sent out from the UK ~ I have one of the last batch of
750cc Interceptors that Norton "intercepted" at Southampton docks the
day they bought RE. It's still in CKD state in the same packing case it
was when I paid £50 for it in 1973 (or was it 74?)

Once the Indian factory ceased to get support from Norton they just
started building their own version of the 350cc Bullet, which has been
available in the UK for several years. Riding one is like stepping back
through time :-)

Signature

Regards

Steve G

Stuart Gray - 05 Jan 2008 11:58 GMT
>> Yours maybe, but not mine which is the best of British (Leyland) which
>> explains a lot I suppose.
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> available in the UK for several years. Riding one is like stepping back
> through time :-)

They do a whole range of bikes, from the "classics" which use the same
350 and 500 engines as they did in the 50s, to "moderns" which have
newer engines (and electric starts), and even a diesel (not available in
the UK but I can buy one here in Switzerland*) that does ridiculous mpg.

Stuart

*Oh, I've moved from France, if anyone is remotely interested.
Austin Shackles - 05 Jan 2008 13:56 GMT
>>> Yours maybe, but not mine which is the best of British (Leyland) which
>>> explains a lot I suppose.
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
>*Oh, I've moved from France, if anyone is remotely interested.

Yeah, but the diesel enfield is totally horrible.
Signature

Austin Shackles.  www.ddol-las.net  my opinions are just that
Travel The Galaxy!  Meet Fascinating Life Forms...
------------------------------------------------\  
  >>  http://www.schlockmercenary.com/  <<      \  ...and Kill them.
a webcartoon by Howard Tayler; I like it, maybe you will too!

Stuart Gray - 05 Jan 2008 15:02 GMT
>>>>Yours maybe, but not mine which is the best of British (Leyland) which
>>>>explains a lot I suppose.
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>
> Yeah, but the diesel enfield is totally horrible.
Probably, but I just wanted to point out that there is more to Enfield
than the "original" Bullet.

Stuart
SteveG - 05 Jan 2008 15:57 GMT
> They do a whole range of bikes, from the "classics" which use the same
> 350 and 500 engines as they did in the 50s, to "moderns" which have
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> *Oh, I've moved from France, if anyone is remotely interested.

I appreciate they now do a range of newer bikes too, Stuart, some of
which are quite good .. but that diesel is awful.

So, you've moved from France .. where to?

Signature

Regards

Steve G

Stuart Gray - 05 Jan 2008 16:03 GMT
>> They do a whole range of bikes, from the "classics" which use the same
>> 350 and 500 engines as they did in the 50s, to "moderns" which have
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> So, you've moved from France .. where to?

I refer the honourable gentleman to my earlier statement.

Actually, just down from Montreux (On the Lake Geneva Shoreline), where
I am now the Head of IT at a rather nice International Boarding School.
 It's great here - water, snow, mountains, just like Wales but with
money.  Ideal for Land-Rovers.

Which makes it a real pisser that my 110 is terminal, and I can't do
anything with it until I get an expert witness for the court case
against Willetts, to prove that it isn't a County (as advertised), and
that I could reasonably think that it was fitted with a 2.5 diesel (as I
communicated with the defendants, your Honour) rather than the 2.25 that
it has (and which now has knackered piston rings, AFAICT).

Stuart
Oily - 06 Jan 2008 12:03 GMT
"Stuart Gray"    wrote..................

> Which makes it a real pisser that my 110 is terminal, and I can't do
> anything with it until I get an expert witness for the court case
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Stuart

Just curious, what makes you think the piston rings are knackered?
And IMHO I think you would be better off with a 2.25 rather than a NA 2.5 so
long as it was 5 bearing.

Martin
Stuart Gray - 06 Jan 2008 13:24 GMT
> "Stuart Gray"    wrote..................
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Martin

It isn't any of the top end gaskets, they have been changed.  There is
no evidence of a crack in the block.  It's burning oil like there is no
tomorrow, there is no power at all, and there is a clanging noise.  The
valves are fine, as is the timing.  I haven't had the sump off, but I
can't think of any other way that oil could be getting into the
cylinders, that would also explain the disastrous loss of power.

And I paid for a 2.5, so I want one!  AIUI there is a little bit better
top end speed on the 2.5 (it's got to be better than 40 mph, at any rate).

Stuart
Oily - 06 Jan 2008 15:14 GMT
"Stuart Gray"    wrote.............

> It isn't any of the top end gaskets, they have been changed.  There is
> no evidence of a crack in the block.  It's burning oil like there is no
> tomorrow, there is no power at all, and there is a clanging noise.  The
> valves are fine, as is the timing.  I haven't had the sump off, but I
> can't think of any other way that oil could be getting into the
> cylinders, that would also explain the disastrous loss of power.

You didn't say if the gaskets were replaced whilst investigating these
problems or if it is actually burning oil or just smoking heavily or if the
injection pump timing is fine along with the valve timing or if there was
any appreciable wear or marks in the bores etc. Does it make any difference
if you have slacken the injector pipes in turn to maybe ascertain which
cylinder the noise is coming from? I just can't see why there should be oil
in all the cylinders. Is the 'clanging' noise due to a broken piston, trying
to compress the oil in the bores or just an injector stuck open. Is there
actually diesel in the tank?  Restricted air inlet? Dodgy breather system?
Tappets not set right? Too many unknowns here to venture an opinion.

> And I paid for a 2.5, so I want one!

I'm not surprised.

 AIUI there is a little bit better
> top end speed on the 2.5 (it's got to be better than 40 mph, at any rate).
>
> Stuart

It would be alright with a 200 Tdi shoved in it.

Martin
srtgray - 06 Jan 2008 16:25 GMT
> "Stuart Gray"    wrote.............
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> actually diesel in the tank?  Restricted air inlet? Dodgy breather system?
> Tappets not set right? Too many unknowns here to venture an opinion.

Yes, all gaskets replaced (including valve stem), yes diesel in tank
(I drove the f.cker around for a bit), yes tappets set, no I haven't
slackened off the pipes, it's producing loads of blue smoke, injectors
are new and adjusted.  I'm just fed up with the whole damn thing, and
it will be for sale once I've sorted the court case.

> > And I paid for a 2.5, so I want one!
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Martin

Yes, if I could get one at the right price - and available in France.
I just want shot of the whole bloody vehicle.  Which is a shame, since
the chassis and bodywork are in fantastic condition.

Stuart
Oily - 06 Jan 2008 20:25 GMT
"srtgray"   wrote............

> Yes, if I could get one at the right price - and available in France.
> I just want shot of the whole bloody vehicle.  Which is a shame, since
> the chassis and bodywork are in fantastic condition.
>
> Stuart

My commiserations, it is a shame, I hope your New Year improves.

Martin
Cheshire Steve - 05 Jan 2008 01:04 GMT
> Yours maybe, but not mine which is the best of British (Leyland) which
> explains a lot I suppose.
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> > Steve

They also make a large number of clones of the old 1930s Lister single
cylinder diesel (known generically as the Listeroids). Reading about
them is scary - apparently they are made all over the show, and one
account says all engines must always be stripped down to remove
casting sand etc - if it has been run by the factory it is probably
ruined. I was at least impressed that they could make the injectors
(due to the fine machining tolerances), but it seems they are by
Bosch.

Steve
Cheshire Steve - 05 Jan 2008 01:16 GMT
> > Yours maybe, but not mine which is the best of British (Leyland) which
> > explains a lot I suppose.
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>
> Steve

Regards the listeroids, couldn't resist adding this link when I found
it, the name of the engine make is brilliant. Why isn't this company
taking over Land Rover !!!

http://utterpower.com/indian_fuking_6_1.htm

Steve
Derek - 05 Jan 2008 16:31 GMT
>> > Yours maybe, but not mine which is the best of British (Leyland) which
>> > explains a lot I suppose.
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
>
> Steve

Very interesting piece that Steve thanks for sharing.
Derek
Larry - 10 Jan 2008 16:45 GMT
Worlds cheapest car

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7180396.stm

Signature

Larry

Series 3 Rust and Holes

> Just heard that the Indian company Tata is talking about buying Jaguar
> and Land Rover from Ford !
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Steve
Dave Liquorice - 10 Jan 2008 22:26 GMT
> Worlds cheapest car
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7180396.stm

Looks good, an designed well for its (urban?) target market. I wonder if
you can get a couple of goats and a crate of chickens in the back? And how
tough it is, it needs 2CV type toughness. Nancy computer control for every
function either, though I guess it will have to have some form of
computerised engine management to get the emmisions low enough.

Signature

Cheers                                              new5pam@howhill.com
Dave.                                             pam is missing e-mail

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.