MOT question.
The question; would a freelander pass its MOT if the drive to the rear
wheels was disconnected?
I have just been servicing my freelander, and am concerned about the Viscous
coupling on the prop shaft. The viscous coupling unit is not seized but is
extremely difficult to turn; I have therefore removed the prop shafts and
viscous coupling. I am using the freelander front wheel drive only, it feels
much better to drive than it did before, perhaps a bit quicker, and probably
more economical. Has anyone had experience of running a freelander with the
drive to the rear wheels disconnected?
I will restore the drive to the rear wheels once I can find out how to test
the viscous coupling. But the MOT may be due before I can replace it.
Thanks
Derek
Defender 90 300Tdi
Freelander Sport Td4
Ian Rawlings - 11 Jan 2008 21:00 GMT
> MOT question.
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> coupling on the prop shaft. The viscous coupling unit is not seized but is
> extremely difficult to turn;
I think it's supposed to be like that isn't it? ISTR someone with a
rangie with VC saying it was.

Signature
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
Dougal - 11 Jan 2008 21:04 GMT
> MOT question.
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> coupling on the prop shaft. The viscous coupling unit is not seized but is
> extremely difficult to turn;
That's what I would expect i.e. it's meant to be like that.
The viscous coupling in the RRC had a testing procedure in the manual I
can't see anything equivalent for the Freelander. The figures won't
necessarily be the same but as a guide, for the RRC a constant torque of
20 Nm (15 lbf.ft) applied across the unit should turn the shafts by
about 25 to 30 degrees in relation to each other over a one minute period.
> I have therefore removed the prop shafts and
> viscous coupling. I am using the freelander front wheel drive only, it feels
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Derek
laundry_man - 11 Jan 2008 22:17 GMT
>> MOT question.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>>
>> Derek
Hello Dougal
Yes those figures you give for the RR I would think are similar to what I
have on this one.
I was concerned there was something wrong, when on the supermarket carpark,
trying to turn into a parking space the vehicle stop rather quickly,
transmission wind up? But it does have a different make of tyre on the front
to those on the rear, which could be part of the problem. Thanks for those
figures I will put it on the bench and give it a test.
Derek........>
Oily - 12 Jan 2008 12:01 GMT
> > MOT question.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> 20 Nm (15 lbf.ft) applied across the unit should turn the shafts by
> about 25 to 30 degrees in relation to each other over a one minute period.
I didn't know that when I first got my old RRC 200 Tdi, I thought the VC
was seized. I took out the BW transfer box and temporarily replaced it with
one from an earlier RR auto with centre diff but when I came across another
BW one that had broken the chain and case and saw the thickness of the main
casing (about as thick as an eggshell) I left the earlier transfer box in
situ. It was slightly noisier but never gave any trouble and the only mod
was to redrill one of the holes on the handbrake backplate. Can't remember
if I had to fit the older props though.
Martin
Derek - 11 Jan 2008 22:06 GMT
> MOT question.
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Freelander Sport Td4
I had a squint at RAVE there is no detail about testing the IRD the
maintainence seems to be restricted to draining and refilling and looking
for a leak.maybe in a separate supplement I'll have to have a look about.
Derek
Long tall ugly - 11 Jan 2008 22:38 GMT
>MOT question.
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
>Freelander Sport Td4
With regard to the MOT question,
My Disco went through no probs with the front prop missing,
all I got was advisory saying it was missing (as if I didn't know)
Did over 500 mi like that, got some slapping noise from the transer
box because I had to have it in "diff lock" and there for one side was
had no tension on it and of course no 4 X 4 on wet grass when I had to
pull the caravan off pitch (oops made a mess on the grass)
improved the mpg !
Having said all that new prop now fitted mpg down a little (chuck in
more cooking oil to offset cost) and much better drive and I feel
happier.
Regards
John
gordon - 13 Jan 2008 11:14 GMT
Recently MoT'd my 90 with no front prop or diff. Chap just said if it
isn't there I can't test it.
Gordon