> >>Impact wrench... Has a dial on it with numbered settings. Maybe a thick
> >>question but what will these settings adjust?
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> broken wheel stud and still losing a wheel.
> Alan
> But the impact wrench that Lee is using is most likely an 1/2" drive,
>whereas you are probably using a 3/4" or 1" drive, a much bigger wrench, and
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>the wheel nuts on a Landrover with most of the 1/2" drive variety of impact
>wrench, and certainly not stretch the studs.
Whether the tool is capable of overtightening or not is a function of
the tool, the compressor and the nuts you're tightening. My 1/2" impact
wrench certainly would tighten way beyond the recommended torque.
Inferring that it is reasonable use of an impact wrench in the same
paragraph as stating that less torque is required to overtighten modern
nuts is somewhat contradictory and probably foolhardy to say the least.
Spin them on but nip up to torque by hand.

Signature
AndyG
Oily - 21 Feb 2008 21:27 GMT
> > But the impact wrench that Lee is using is most likely an 1/2" drive,
> >whereas you are probably using a 3/4" or 1" drive, a much bigger wrench, and
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> paragraph as stating that less torque is required to overtighten modern
> nuts is somewhat contradictory and probably foolhardy to say the least.
Read it again. That's not what I said.
> Spin them on but nip up to torque by hand.
Absolutely, s'wat I do.
Martin
Dave Liquorice - 22 Feb 2008 00:08 GMT
>> Spin them on but nip up to torque by hand.
>
> Absolutely, s'wat I do.
You must have strong fingers.

Signature
Cheers
Dave.
AJG - 22 Feb 2008 23:05 GMT
>Read it again. That's not what I said.
Apologies - your paragraph has two meanings of which you obviously meant
one and I read the other.

Signature
AndyG
Oily - 24 Feb 2008 00:00 GMT
> >Read it again. That's not what I said.
> >
> Apologies - your paragraph has two meanings of which you obviously meant
> one and I read the other.
No probs mate :-)
Martin
Austin Shackles - 22 Feb 2008 07:25 GMT
>> But the impact wrench that Lee is using is most likely an 1/2" drive,
>>whereas you are probably using a 3/4" or 1" drive, a much bigger wrench, and
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>paragraph as stating that less torque is required to overtighten modern
>nuts is somewhat contradictory and probably foolhardy to say the least.
don't know about the modern ones, but the older discos on alloys have
sod-off nuts which are not tapers, they have a flange and a washer. I doubt
there's much risk of overtightening them with an el-cheapo rattlgun - the
el-cheapo I had wouldn't loosen the buggers if they were tight... I've not
studied the modern RR/Disco nuts and studs that closely.

Signature
Austin Shackles. www.ddol-las.net my opinions are just that
Travel The Galaxy! Meet Fascinating Life Forms...
------------------------------------------------\
>> http://www.schlockmercenary.com/ << \ ...and Kill them.
a webcartoon by Howard Tayler; I like it, maybe you will too!
EMB - 22 Feb 2008 08:27 GMT
> don't know about the modern ones, but the older discos on alloys have
> sod-off nuts which are not tapers, they have a flange and a washer. I doubt
> there's much risk of overtightening them with an el-cheapo rattlgun - the
> el-cheapo I had wouldn't loosen the buggers if they were tight... I've not
> studied the modern RR/Disco nuts and studs that closely.
My informal testing showed that the average el-cheapo rattlegun wouldn't
tighten a nut to much over 180lbft. However my CP and Snap-On
rattleguns perform very close to their specifications of 500 and 450lbft
respectively.
The Snap-On and CP both feature a higher reverse torque so they will
undo things they have tightened, the el-cheapo didn't even appear
capable of this.