Load area dimensions 90

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

Larry - 26 Mar 2008 20:09 GMT

Does anyone know the interior length of the load area in a 90 compared to a
109 station wagon ?

Signature

Larry

Series 3 Rust and Holes

Reply to this Message

Oily - 26 Mar 2008 20:51 GMT

> Does anyone know the interior length of the load area in a 90 compared to a
> 109 station wagon ?
>
> Larry
>
> Series 3 Rust and Holes

The van side panels of the 90" are about 4" longer than the 88" so assuming
the body is also 4" longer overall then it will be far shorter than the load
length of a 109" (if that helps) :-)

Martin

Reply to this Message

Oily - 26 Mar 2008 20:57 GMT

> > Does anyone know the interior length of the load area in a 90 compared to
> a
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Martin

Bad form I know but the floor length of my 109" is 77.5 inches and the
bulkhead is a couple of inches farther back on the 109" compared to the 88".

Reply to this Message

Mark Solesbury - 26 Mar 2008 20:57 GMT

>>> Does anyone know the interior length of the load area in a 90 compared
> to
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> Bad form I know but the floor length of my 109" is 77.5 inches and the
> bulkhead is a couple of inches farther back on the 109" compared to the 88".

This site seems to suggest 1144cm

http://www.bestpricecar.com/used-car/LAND%20ROVER%20DEFENDER%2090%20SWB%20TURBO%
20%20%20Td5%202.5%20Diesel%20(2006)/OY06HWR/7628/

Signature

Mark
1996 90 300tdi
1987 RR V8 EFI
2007 Golf GT

http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/ - Firefox Rules!
http://fireftp.mozdev.org/ - FTP Plugin for Firefox
http://ietab.mozdev.org/ - IE tab. Get Windows updates in Firefox

Reply to this Message

Oily - 26 Mar 2008 21:16 GMT

> >>> Does anyone know the interior length of the load area in a 90 compared
> > to
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> This site seems to suggest 1144cm

http://www.bestpricecar.com/used-car/LAND%20ROVER%20DEFENDER%2090%20SWB%20TURBO%
20%20%20Td5%202.5%20Diesel%20(2006)/OY06HWR/7628/

> Mark

I should learn to read properly and then I would notice the 'station wagon'
bit.

But I still think on reading again that 11.44 metres is a bit long for a
109" SW loadspace. You're falling to my standards. :-)

Martin

Reply to this Message

Larry - 26 Mar 2008 21:45 GMT

I'd guess that is about 5 - 6 inches less than the 109 then, due to the loss
of the overhang I suspect.

Signature

Larry

Series 3 Rust and Holes

> I should learn to read properly and then I would notice the 'station
> wagon'
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Martin

Reply to this Message

Oily - 26 Mar 2008 23:31 GMT

> I'd guess that is about 5 - 6 inches less than the 109 then, due to the loss
> of the overhang I suspect.
>
> Larry

I've got my son's 90 at work for sale and a friend across the road has a
109" station wagon so I will measure them tomorrow and report back if no-one
else answers your question. Do you just want the distance from behind the
centre seats of the SW with the seats folded forward or not? I'll take both
measurements.

Martin

Reply to this Message

Larry - 27 Mar 2008 14:28 GMT

I am only interested in the distance behind the centre seats with the seats
in place.

Signature

Larry

Series 3 Rust and Holes

> I've got my son's 90 at work for sale and a friend across the road has a
> 109" station wagon so I will measure them tomorrow and report back if
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Martin

Reply to this Message

Rate this thread: