Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Land Rover Cars / May 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Rob Roy Brown and a bit more robbery

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Derek - 29 May 2008 23:46 GMT
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_depth/629/629/7293011.stm

makes you think before buying a new motor but....  yes still the same
nonsense.Most of the low band cars on this list will be scrap within 6 years
the replacement will cost the environment 42tons of CO2  a well maintained
Landrover will still be motoring along when the 2nd replacement is being
crushed  - that Land rover will produce on average twice its weight of C02
per year about 4 tons. So in each six year period it will produce 24 tons
thats a net reduction of 18 tons per "environmentally friendly" eurobox
lifespan? no not really you see that only applies if the eurobox is not
actually using fuel. I suppose the way things are going that is actually a
possibilty( you can work the figures out for any annoying 'green' friends
particular vehicle by doubling the weight ).

Derek
Ian Rawlings - 30 May 2008 10:35 GMT
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_depth/629/629/7293011.stm
>
> makes you think before buying a new motor but....  yes still the same
> nonsense.Most of the low band cars on this list will be scrap within 6 years
> the replacement will cost the environment 42tons of CO2

Personally I think they ought to add in the cost of making the thing,
that would put the stupid hybrids in their proper bands!

>  a well maintained
> Landrover will still be motoring along when the 2nd replacement is being
> crushed

Hmm, D3s and modern Range Rovers?  Even current range rovers and
discoveries lose their values very quickly compared to Defenders
because people are more picky over the trim, old ones still exist of
course but I'll bet a much larger proportion of discos and rangies are
scrapped than Defenders.  I'd be unsurprised to find that they're
scrapped at a similar rate as the japanese 4x4s.

Signature

Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
http://youtube.com/user/tarcus69
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tarcus/sets/

William Black - 30 May 2008 22:21 GMT
> Hmm, D3s and modern Range Rovers?  Even current range rovers and
> discoveries lose their values very quickly compared to Defenders
> because people are more picky over the trim, old ones still exist of
> course but I'll bet a much larger proportion of discos and rangies are
> scrapped than Defenders.  I'd be unsurprised to find that they're
> scrapped at a similar rate as the japanese 4x4s.

Not sure about that.

I find that the preferred vehicle as second car for a number of leisure
activities that involve carrying reasonably large amounts of stuff about is
an old Range Rover.

Go to any major re-enactment and you'll see dozens and dozens of them about,
all around ten years or so old,  all a bit rusty around the rear hatch and
all being lovingly kept on the road because the owners have half a tonne of
gear to get over a wet field six or eight times a year...

Same with the horse crowd and the rare breeds lot.

These activities don't even impinge on most people's lives except as some
form of spectator activity and the cars stay on the drive around the back of
the house most of the time,  but they're there...

They want Range Rovers and Discoveries because their wives mutter about
comfort and 'ratty draughty old Land Rovers' and they want to take the
family with them when they go away for the weekend,  otherwise they don't
get to go,  but while something old with 'Land Rover' on the bonnet is cool,
something old with 'Mitsubishi' on the bonnet means 'big unfashionable old
car nobody likes'.

Signature

William Black

I've seen things you people wouldn't believe.
Barbeques on fire by the chalets past the castle headland
I watched the gift shops glitter in the darkness off the Newborough gate
All these moments will be lost in time,  like icecream on the beach
Time for tea.

Ian Rawlings - 30 May 2008 22:38 GMT
> I find that the preferred vehicle as second car for a number of leisure
> activities that involve carrying reasonably large amounts of stuff about is
> an old Range Rover.

I don't doubt that there are plenty about, but I do doubt that the
survival rate is anything like as high as it is for the Defenders,
which tend to get kept going well beyond their sensible lifespan by
large numbers of nerds like us ;-) Resale value and depreciation of
the more posh vehicles seems to be much worse than the Defenders,
90/100 and series trucks so I'd have thought they hit the crushers
more readily (based on second-hand prices).

Plus of course there's the dratted electrics with the Range Rovers..

.. and the suspension....

.. and the..

Signature

Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
http://youtube.com/user/tarcus69
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tarcus/sets/

William Black - 30 May 2008 22:46 GMT
>> I find that the preferred vehicle as second car for a number of leisure
>> activities that involve carrying reasonably large amounts of stuff about
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> .. and the..

Being a re-enactor I mix with a lot of the 'old RR as a second car' brigade.

It's always the rear hatch rusting that screws them up,  all the rest,  the
mechanical stuff,  the electrics,  they can do themselves (there are a
remarkable number of nerds and academics doing re-enactment) but they don't
have the skills to do the bodywork and painting stuff .

Signature

William Black

I've seen things you people wouldn't believe.
Barbeques on fire by the chalets past the castle headland
I watched the gift shops glitter in the darkness off the Newborough gate
All these moments will be lost in time,  like icecream on the beach
Time for tea.

Oily - 30 May 2008 23:03 GMT
> > I find that the preferred vehicle as second car for a number of leisure
> > activities that involve carrying reasonably large amounts of stuff about is
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Plus of course there's the dratted electrics with the Range Rovers..

I manage to live with that, just pull bits off that don't work.  :-)

> .. and the suspension....

Nowt wrong wi't' suspension

> .. and the..y    last nearly as long as Defenders.

Martin
William Tasso - 30 May 2008 23:43 GMT
> ...
> just pull bits off that don't work.  :-)

ahh yes, the engineer's search for perfection.

Signature

William Tasso

Land Rover - 110 V8
Discovery - V8

.mother - 30 May 2008 11:01 GMT
[..]
>actually using fuel. I suppose the way things are going that is actually a
>possibilty( you can work the figures out for any annoying 'green' friends
>particular vehicle by doubling the weight ).

Someone's actually written this all up scientifically somewhere -
can't remember where, p'raps my Googlegimp we do the honours again ;-)

As an aside, the Green Party locally are well sussed and have been
using Grumble as an example of good practice.  Last year one of the
Greenies corrected the LibDem w.nker who was desperately trying to say
that motors like Grumble were responsible for killing the planet.  I
have to say, especially given their recent stance, along with FOTE
about the folly of backdating of vehicle tax, that I'm more inclined
to try and work 'with' those who hold a true green agenda - rather
than those who just think there's a quick vote in it.
EMB - 30 May 2008 12:01 GMT
> As an aside, the Green Party locally are well sussed and have been
> using Grumble as an example of good practice.  Last year one of the
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> to try and work 'with' those who hold a true green agenda - rather
> than those who just think there's a quick vote in it.

Absolutely.  My father is greener than a green thing and has the
international awards to prove it.  But... he still drives a Series II
and is well aware and supportive of the logic behind Grumble et al.
Ian Rawlings - 30 May 2008 12:02 GMT
> [..]
>>actually using fuel. I suppose the way things are going that is actually a
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Someone's actually written this all up scientifically somewhere -
> can't remember where, p'raps my Googlegimp we do the honours again ;-)

Your wish is my command;

http://www.cnwmr.com/nss-folder/automotiveenergy/

That's the report about how much energy and pollution is caused by the
manufacture, running and scrapping of vehicles, which should be
compulsory reading for hybrid vehicle owners.  It's even received the
blessing of Greenpeace who said it's right but that they reckon
hybrids will get better so are still the way forward....  This despite
the Prius taking 50% more energy and pollutants to build than a
Humvee, although that does depend on how readily you swallow the
predicted vehicle miles until scrapping, 100,000 miles for a prius and
300,000 miles for a humvee.  Not sure how many hummers would still be
on the roads after 300,000 miles.  The 100,000 miles for the prius is
the manufacturer's predicted lifespan and is quite pathetic.  Even my
old Lotus has done more than that.  Even the tyres recommended for the
prius are low-mileage ones and last one third of the miles of those on
most other mass-market cars.

Signature

Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
http://youtube.com/user/tarcus69
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tarcus/sets/

William Black - 30 May 2008 13:44 GMT
> That's the report about how much energy and pollution is caused by the
> manufacture, running and scrapping of vehicles, which should be
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> prius are low-mileage ones and last one third of the miles of those on
> most other mass-market cars.

The major problem with the Prius isn't the mileage it's the battery life.

They only give a six (or seven) year warranty,  and you can bet your life
it'll last about five minutes beyond that before going to the dogs,  and it
costs about £5,000 for a new battery pack,  which is more than a new engine
for a Landy.

I've no ideas how they get rid of the dead battery but I'm prepared to bet
it makes a bloody great big hole in the ozone layer or an equally big
polluted bit in some landfill...

My Defender is over twelve years old now and still going reasonably well.
It's carbon footprint is much smaller than a Eurobox that'll last seven or
eight years before disintegration and yet I'm the one who gets lambasted by
the green meanies if I venture into a city...

On the other hand my road tax is still only £200,  so someone out there is
awake...

Signature

William Black

I've seen things you people wouldn't believe.
Barbeques on fire by the chalets past the castle headland
I watched the gift shops glitter in the darkness off the Newborough gate
All these moments will be lost in time,  like icecream on the beach
Time for tea.

Ian Rawlings - 30 May 2008 14:49 GMT
> The major problem with the Prius isn't the mileage it's the battery life.

ISTR them offering various warranties for the battery, whether that
includes actual degredation of the cells or actual cell faults I don't
know but I doubt it'll cover cell degredation.  I think that the
100,000 mile life was somewhere around when they were expecting the
cells to expire.

> My Defender is over twelve years old now and still going reasonably well.
> It's carbon footprint is much smaller than a Eurobox that'll last seven or
> eight years before disintegration and yet I'm the one who gets lambasted by
> the green meanies if I venture into a city...

Indeedy, but the greenies are mostly fashion followers, switching from
4x4s to patio heaters depending on the headlines..

Signature

Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
http://youtube.com/user/tarcus69
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tarcus/sets/

steve Taylor - 30 May 2008 15:58 GMT
> The major problem with the Prius isn't the mileage it's the battery life.

Are they using lithium yet ?

Steve
William Black - 30 May 2008 16:20 GMT
>> The major problem with the Prius isn't the mileage it's the battery life.
>
> Are they using lithium yet ?

No idea.

Whatever they're using it'll be a nightmare to get rid of,  big batteries
are always bad news...

Last time I could be bothered to look it was Nickel Metal Hydride,  which is
the same technology Aldi are selling in their cheap rechargables...

I also know that at least two US companies are selling advanced battery
technology for them,  but you won't be allowed to fit them in the EC because
they aren't  approved...

Signature

William Black

I've seen things you people wouldn't believe.
Barbeques on fire by the chalets past the castle headland
I watched the gift shops glitter in the darkness off the Newborough gate
All these moments will be lost in time,  like icecream on the beach
Time for tea.

.mother - 30 May 2008 14:30 GMT
>Your wish is my command;
>
>http://www.cnwmr.com/nss-folder/automotiveenergy/

Ah, that's the one (thanks, BTW).

Wonder why a Government that seems so influenced by evidence, appear
not to like, erm, evidence?
Ian Rawlings - 30 May 2008 14:49 GMT
> Wonder why a Government that seems so influenced by evidence, appear
> not to like, erm, evidence?

Ah, but it has to be the *right* evidence...  

Signature

Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
http://youtube.com/user/tarcus69
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tarcus/sets/

SpamTrapSeeSig - 30 May 2008 17:42 GMT
>Even the tyres recommended for the
>prius are low-mileage ones and last one third of the miles of those on
>most other mass-market cars.

I wonder: high pressures improve economy, but beyond a certain point
greatly increase tyre wear (IIRC, it's skid not grip at a microscopic
level).

Are they doing tricky things of that sort to hide the otherwise poorer
MPG figures?

Regards,

Simonm.

Signature

simonm|at|muircom|dot|demon|.|c|oh|dot|u|kay
SIMON MUIR, BRISTOL UK
EUROPEANS AGAINST THE EU                   http://www.eurofaq.freeuk.com/
GT250A'76  R80/RT'86  110CSW TDi'88  www.kc3ltd.co.uk/profile/eurofollie/

SpamTrapSeeSig - 30 May 2008 19:52 GMT
>>Even the tyres recommended for the
>>prius are low-mileage ones and last one third of the miles of those on
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>Are they doing tricky things of that sort to hide the otherwise poorer
>MPG figures?

To answer my own question:

"Other components on the Prius, such as tires, are less distance-mileage
friendly than nonhybrids of the same size and weight. For example,
surveys of Prius owners by us and other research companies show barely
16,000 miles average life for original-equipment tires compared to
43,000 for Toyota Corolla. This high-tech tire uses a compound and
design that reduces rolling resistance and thus improves fuel economy.
But the typical replacement tire for a Prius will not likely be the OEM
specialty variety, cutting both fuel economy and distance-per-battery
charge of the Prius."

<http://www.cnwmr.com/nss-folder/automotiveenergy/Why%201001000%20Miles%2
0for%20Prius.pdf>

Regards,

Simonm.

Signature

simonm|at|muircom|dot|demon|.|c|oh|dot|u|kay
SIMON MUIR, BRISTOL UK
EUROPEANS AGAINST THE EU                   http://www.eurofaq.freeuk.com/
GT250A'76  R80/RT'86  110CSW TDi'88  www.kc3ltd.co.uk/profile/eurofollie/

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.