> I am sure this will stir up a hornets nest of partisan posts from
> those who love there SUV's
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> They are really two different kinds of vehicle entirely and those who
> hate SUV's realy need to grasp that and not persecute 4 x 4's for
the
> sake of it.
>
> The point about my Landie is she ain't pretty in the conventional
> sence, dents and scratches don't matter, they add to the "patina"
Do dents and scratches matter to a Range Rover or Discovery owner?
Possibly when newish maybe, and no one actually *wants* more dents,
but it is all relative and variable. Someone who buys a new Range
Rover as a work truck will be less concerned than a swank about
cosmetic dings ISTM.
Huw
horse - 25 Sep 2004 19:27 GMT
>> The point about my Landie is she ain't pretty in the conventional
>> sence, dents and scratches don't matter, they add to the "patina"
I agree!
> Do dents and scratches matter to a Range Rover or Discovery owner?
Not me! I *love* 'em! Adds 'character'!
> Possibly when newish maybe, and no one actually *wants* more dents,
I *do* It pisses off the uptight tossers that inhabit my estate!
The so called 'adults' look at my RR and sneer, but their kids love it's
battered look!
I'm with the kids!
Regards,
horse
Huw - 28 Sep 2004 10:24 GMT
>>> The point about my Landie is she ain't pretty in the conventional
>>> sence, dents and scratches don't matter, they add to the "patina"
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> horse
Well there we are then. It takes all sorts. Proven!
Huw
Austin Shackles - 27 Sep 2004 07:15 GMT
>Do dents and scratches matter to a Range Rover or Discovery owner?
>Possibly when newish maybe, and no one actually *wants* more dents,
>but it is all relative and variable. Someone who buys a new Range
>Rover as a work truck will be less concerned than a swank about
>cosmetic dings ISTM.
quite a few on my disco, they don't worry me much. One in the bonnet
according to propabably-aprocryphal tale was made by the
previous-owner-but-one shooting a pheasant while same was overhead the car,
and the luckless bird falling in on the bonnet. 's a good story, even if it
ain't true.
Warwick Barnes - 02 Oct 2004 22:42 GMT
The message <1tbfl0p24pm3ql9qk6hbqe7c0442bbukn1@4ax.com>
from Austin Shackles <austin@ddol-las.fsnet.co.uk> contains these words:
> quite a few on my disco, they don't worry me much. One in the bonnet
> according to propabably-aprocryphal tale was made by the
> previous-owner-but-one shooting a pheasant while same was overhead the car,
> and the luckless bird falling in on the bonnet. 's a good story, even if it
> ain't true.
yes it is I was there!
well in the sense of one particular vehicle and one particular pheasant.
well more than once actually but only one was a disco.

Signature
If you received this through the miracle of modern technology then all
is well; if not then situation normal.
Chris father of :-) ( also at chrisjbarnes@openlink.org )
www.users.zetnet.co.uk/barnes_firsnorton
Austin Shackles - 03 Oct 2004 09:20 GMT
>The message <1tbfl0p24pm3ql9qk6hbqe7c0442bbukn1@4ax.com>
>from Austin Shackles <austin@ddol-las.fsnet.co.uk> contains these words:
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>well in the sense of one particular vehicle and one particular pheasant.
>well more than once actually but only one was a disco.
H537WTS?