Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Land Rover Cars / October 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

SUV's vs proper Utes

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Larry - 26 Sep 2004 11:59 GMT
I am sure this will stir up a hornets nest of partisan posts from those who
love there SUV's

But my opinion is that though they are capable of off road use, they are not
really intended for it, with all that trim and bits that can fall off, get
scuffed, dented or whatever, whereas Defenders and Series are designed from
the outset as pure utilities.

They are really two different kinds of vehicle entirely and those who hate
SUV's realy need to grasp that and not persecute 4 x 4's for the sake of it.

The point about my Landie is she ain't pretty in the conventional sence,
dents and scratches don't matter, they add to the "patina"

The other main reason I drive a landie is because there is nothing that
cannot be fixed, unlike some cheap old banger that would inherently be less
safe and more expensive to keep in the long run.

I like something that was built to last and does (with the appropriate
constant attention of course)

--
Larry
Series 3 rust and holes
Huw - 26 Sep 2004 14:36 GMT
> I am sure this will stir up a hornets nest of partisan posts from
> those who love there SUV's
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> They are really two different kinds of vehicle entirely and those who
> hate SUV's realy need to grasp that and not persecute 4 x 4's for
the
> sake of it.
>
> The point about my Landie is she ain't pretty in the conventional
> sence, dents and scratches don't matter, they add to the "patina"

Do dents and scratches matter to a Range Rover or Discovery owner?
Possibly when newish maybe, and no one actually *wants* more dents,
but it is all relative and variable. Someone who buys a new Range
Rover as a work truck will be less concerned than a swank about
cosmetic dings ISTM.

Huw
horse - 25 Sep 2004 19:27 GMT
>> The point about my Landie is she ain't pretty in the conventional
>> sence, dents and scratches don't matter, they add to the "patina"
I agree!

> Do dents and scratches matter to a Range Rover or Discovery owner?
Not me! I *love* 'em! Adds 'character'!

> Possibly when newish maybe, and no one actually *wants* more dents,
I *do* It pisses off the uptight tossers that inhabit my estate!
The so called 'adults' look at my RR and sneer, but their kids love it's
battered look!
I'm with the kids!

Regards,

horse
Huw - 28 Sep 2004 10:24 GMT
>>> The point about my Landie is she ain't pretty in the conventional
>>> sence, dents and scratches don't matter, they add to the "patina"
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> horse

Well there we are then. It takes all sorts. Proven!

Huw
Austin Shackles - 27 Sep 2004 07:15 GMT
>Do dents and scratches matter to a Range Rover or Discovery owner?
>Possibly when newish maybe, and no one actually *wants* more dents,
>but it is all relative and variable. Someone who buys a new Range
>Rover as a work truck will be less concerned than a swank about
>cosmetic dings ISTM.

quite a few on my disco, they don't worry me much. One in the bonnet
according to propabably-aprocryphal tale was made by the
previous-owner-but-one shooting a pheasant while same was overhead the car,
and the luckless bird falling in on the bonnet.  's a good story, even if it
ain't true.
Warwick Barnes - 02 Oct 2004 22:42 GMT
The message <1tbfl0p24pm3ql9qk6hbqe7c0442bbukn1@4ax.com>
from Austin Shackles <austin@ddol-las.fsnet.co.uk> contains these words:

> quite a few on my disco, they don't worry me much. One in the bonnet
> according to propabably-aprocryphal tale was made by the
> previous-owner-but-one shooting a pheasant while same was overhead the car,
> and the luckless bird falling in on the bonnet.  's a good story, even if it
> ain't true.

yes it is I was there!
well in the sense of one particular vehicle and one particular pheasant.
well more than once actually but only one was a disco.

Signature

If you received this through the miracle of modern technology then all
is well; if not then situation normal.
Chris father of :-) ( also at chrisjbarnes@openlink.org )
www.users.zetnet.co.uk/barnes_firsnorton

Austin Shackles - 03 Oct 2004 09:20 GMT
>The message <1tbfl0p24pm3ql9qk6hbqe7c0442bbukn1@4ax.com>
>from Austin Shackles <austin@ddol-las.fsnet.co.uk> contains these words:
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>well in the sense of one particular vehicle and one particular pheasant.
>well more than once actually but only one was a disco.

H537WTS?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.