Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Land Rover Cars / October 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Realy Realy OT ?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Rory Manton - 11 Oct 2004 13:07 GMT
Just watched an advert for yes car credit and I have a question for all the
intelligentsia heree. The two little girls in the back seat of the car sau
"we would say yes" to a question asked by the  blond girl, but thay don't
say "we would" but a contraction of the two words "we would" .

How do you spell that contraction?

I can't figure it out.

--
Your help is, as always, greatfully receved.

Rory Manton

1957 109 Series One, Daisy
1965 Series 11 SWB GS , Rose.
Paul - xxx - 11 Oct 2004 13:20 GMT
Rory Manton vaguely muttered something like ...
> Just watched an advert for yes car credit and I have a question for all
> the intelligentsia heree. The two little girls in the back seat of the
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> I can't figure it out.

we'd

as in you'd - you would, he'd, he would  etc etc

Signature

Paul ...

(8(|)  Homer Rules !!!

"A tosser is a tosser, no matter what mode of transport they're using."

GbH - 11 Oct 2004 14:36 GMT
> Rory Manton vaguely muttered something like ...
>> Just watched an advert for yes car credit and I have a question for
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> as in you'd - you would, he'd, he would  etc etc

Unfortunately that contraction is indistinguishable from that for we had!

Signature

UR SHGb02+14 &ICMFP
If at first you don't succeed,
maybe skydiving's not for you!

Paul - xxx - 11 Oct 2004 16:54 GMT
GbH vaguely muttered something like ...
>> Rory Manton vaguely muttered something like ...
>>> Just watched an advert for yes car credit and I have a question for
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Unfortunately that contraction is indistinguishable from that for we had!

I wasn't aware that 'we had' could be contracted ... but assuming it can and
you're right, then as it wouldn't normally be used singularly and out of
context in a normal sentence, it isn't really a problem.

Signature

Paul ...

(8(|)  Homer Rules !!!

"A tosser is a tosser, no matter what mode of transport they're using."

Richard Brookman - 11 Oct 2004 21:29 GMT
So Paul - xxx was, like

>> Unfortunately that contraction is indistinguishable from that for we
>> had!
>
> I wasn't aware that 'we had' could be contracted ...

Course it can!  _We would_ have been wet if _we had_ been outside in the
rain = We'd have been wet if we'd been outside in the rain.

Lots of words sound the same - bear (animal), bear (carry), bare
(unclothed) - the context usually makes the meaning clear.  This naked
animal is injured - can you bear the bare bear to hospital?

Or something.  I'll get me trapper's hat...

Signature

Rich

Series 2a
RR 4.6
V8 trialler
dog, wife, kids, whatever

Paul - xxx - 12 Oct 2004 09:48 GMT
Richard Brookman vaguely muttered something like ...
> So Paul - xxx was, like
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Course it can!  _We would_ have been wet if _we had_ been outside in the
> rain = We'd have been wet if we'd been outside in the rain.

Heh, obvious when you think ... which I patently didn't .. ;)

> Lots of words sound the same - bear (animal), bear (carry), bare
> (unclothed) - the context usually makes the meaning clear.  This naked
> animal is injured - can you bear the bare bear to hospital?

Which is what I said in the bit you snipped ... context makes the meaning
clear .. ;)

> Or something.  I'll get me trapper's hat...

And I'll get me jerkin ...

Signature

Paul ...

(8(|)  Homer Rules !!!

"A tosser is a tosser, no matter what mode of transport they're using."

Richard Brookman - 12 Oct 2004 20:00 GMT
So Paul - xxx was, like

>> Or something.  I'll get me trapper's hat...
>
> And I'll get me jerkin ...

Fnarrr.  Gherkins.

Signature

Rich

Series 2a
RR 4.6
V8 trialler
dog, wife, kids, whatever

Rory Manton - 11 Oct 2004 15:16 GMT
> Rory Manton vaguely muttered something like ...
>> Just watched an advert for yes car credit and I have a question for all
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> as in you'd - you would, he'd, he would  etc etc

Thanks for that. I just cant spell to save my liff.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.