Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Land Rover Cars / February 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

sorn

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
dale hammond - 21 Feb 2005 00:45 GMT
i have been sent a summons to court for a vehicle i sold in aug 2003 i
informed dvla of the new owner at the time but they have no record of it the
new owner has not registered the vehicle as i know he was going to restore
it taking his time the only details i have of the new owner were on the
portion of the log book i sent to dvla
in my defence i can get witness statements from work mates and bosses and
family and friends that i did sell the vehicle about this time has any one
else had any experiance like this and know the best way forward will witness
statements be enought
Mark - 21 Feb 2005 09:31 GMT
> i have been sent a summons to court for a vehicle i sold in aug 2003 i
> informed dvla of the new owner at the time but they have no record of it the
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> else had any experiance like this and know the best way forward will witness
> statements be enought

DVLA are b__stards on this. They denied recieving four(4) separate pices
of paper, all detailing the change of ownershiop of a car I bought. Then
they tried to do me for no tax!!! Cue mailstorm over three months,
culminating in the whole thing 'going away', when the origonal owner,
me, and a friend who's a solicitor got together and wrote a 'legalese'
complaint/threat . Best thing to do is to get all the info you can,
approximate dates for dposting, and mailing it to them explaining what
happened(mail them an obvious copy), andf they should sort it out.
They're not intentionally evil, it just seems that way :0)

`Mark
Danny - 21 Feb 2005 09:52 GMT
> DVLA are b__stards on this. They denied recieving four(4) separate pices
> of paper, all detailing the change of ownershiop of a car I bought. Then
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> `Mark

Another useful little "practice" I've learnt, to let them (or anyone
else) know you mean business, is to put a CC at the bottom of the
letter to a solicitor - real or imaginary:

copy to: Lambert, Faulkes and Twatting

 something like that!

Signature

Regards,
Danny

http://www.gaggia-espresso.com (a purely hobby site)
http://www.dannyscoffee.com (UK advert for my mobile espresso service)
http://www.malabargold.co.uk (UK/European online ordering for Malabar
Gold blend)
swap Z for above characters in email address to reply

Dave Liquorice - 21 Feb 2005 09:42 GMT
> i have been sent a summons to court for a vehicle i sold in aug 2003
> i informed dvla of the new owner at the time but they have no record
> of it ...

Did the DVLA send you any notification that they had received your
orginal comminication, I guess not. When I told DVLA about the
transfer of ownership of my last car to the insurance company late
last year I got a letter from 'em telling me that I was no longer
recorded keeper and that I had no further legal resposibilty for that
vehicle and to keep the letter...

> the new owner has not registered the vehicle as i know he was going
> to restore it taking his time

How long has the SORN being inforce? Longer than 2003 I think, so he
should be sending that bit in each year.

> the only details i have of the new owner were on the portion of the
> log book i sent to dvla

Oh dear can't you remember anything about him/her. I have a sneaky
feeling that the DVLA are bit like HMC&E if there is doubt you carry
the can unless you have pretty good evidence otherwise. I guess you
used ordinary letter post for the V5 to DVLA rather than recorded
delivery as well so you have no "proof of posting".

Signature

Cheers                                              new5pam@howhill.com
Dave.                                             pam is missing e-mail

"David G. Bell" - 21 Feb 2005 11:06 GMT
On Monday, in article
    <nyyfbegfubjuvyypbz.ic9nif0.pminews@news.howhill.com>

> > the only details i have of the new owner were on the portion of the
> > log book i sent to dvla
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> used ordinary letter post for the V5 to DVLA rather than recorded
> delivery as well so you have no "proof of posting".

I've just been through the triennial medical renewal on my driving
licence, and, while it's all come through, it's taken a while to sort
out, even allowing for Christmas delays.  It always does.

But DVLA doesn't cope well with anything out of the ordinary -- the form
might ask for dates of appointments "within the last six months", the
hospital has re-timed an appointment, and letters start to shuttle back
and forth.

It's not just DVLA -- some of the offices I dealt with as a farmer were
the same -- DEFRA have even published lists of non-working email
addresses to be used to contact them.

Anyway, recorded delivery doesn't prove what was in the letter.  Keep
copies of everything.

Signature

David G. Bell -- SF Fan, Filker, and Punslinger.

"I am Number Two," said Penfold.  "You are Number Six."

wayne@lardrover.co.uk - 21 Feb 2005 15:59 GMT
>When I told DVLA about the
>transfer of ownership of my last car to the insurance company late
>last year I got a letter from 'em telling me that I was no longer
>recorded keeper and that I had no further legal resposibilty for that
>vehicle and to keep the letter...

Likewise here. I initially thought what a waste of paper and
resources, I get them every time I SORN as well. Now I realise how
useful it actually is, it appears that it is to protect you from them.

Signature

Wayne Davies, Harrogate 07989 556213

Just another point of view...
www.4x4prejudice.org

Tom Woods - 21 Feb 2005 11:38 GMT
>i have been sent a summons to court for a vehicle i sold in aug 2003 i
>informed dvla of the new owner at the time but they have no record of it the
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>else had any experiance like this and know the best way forward will witness
>statements be enought

What sort of court summons have you had?.

I'd have thought that since it has been 18 months since you sold it
you should by now have recieved at least one tax renewal notice, or
notice of a fine for not sorning it.

Theyve attempted to fine me for not sorning things (after they messed
up and kept returning my sorn forms).
I bought a car, and got the sorn fine letter about 4 months later - so
they move fairly quicly and you should not have heard absolutely
nothing for 18 months.

for my run-in i wrote them a letter back with all the evidence i had
(dated letters from them in my case), and they wrote me a 'we have
decided not to pursue your fine' letter a few weeks later.

You should always get proof of posting for any dealing you have with
the DVLA. That is enough to show them that you have posted the
required info off to them (even though the proof of posting doesnt say
anything about the ltter contents)
Mother - 21 Feb 2005 12:02 GMT
>i have been sent a summons to court for a vehicle i sold in aug 2003 i
>informed dvla of the new owner at the time but they have no record of it

For the extra 65p or so, I'd always suggest sending all such
notifications via Recorded Delivery.

So far as your current situation, simply write to the Court, deny the
offence, give the reasons, ask for a trial.  Send this by Recorded
Delivery, if you like, Counter Claim for the cost of the additional
65p postage (legit costs, really).  You'll probably see the case
dropped and you'll then be invited to attend to see through your
Counter Claim...
Larry - 22 Feb 2005 20:57 GMT
When I got rid of my last car I never filled in any paperwork and I had no
idea who the guy was who took it off my hands,

Fortunately I discovered on the RAC site that the registration is still
current so I suppose someone must have registered a change owner

Signature

Larry
Series 3 rust and holes

> i have been sent a summons to court for a vehicle i sold in aug 2003 i
> informed dvla of the new owner at the time but they have no record of it the
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> else had any experiance like this and know the best way forward will witness
> statements be enought
SteveG <\ - 22 Feb 2005 23:25 GMT
Maybe it's still registered to you.

In which case, if it's used in the commission of a crime, or nabbed on a
tax disc/insurance camera then you'll be liable for the
fines/points/prison :-(

Regards

Steve G

> When I got rid of my last car I never filled in any paperwork and I had no
> idea who the guy was who took it off my hands,
>
> Fortunately I discovered on the RAC site that the registration is still
> current so I suppose someone must have registered a change owner
Mother - 23 Feb 2005 15:28 GMT
>Maybe it's still registered to you.

Unlikely I'd have thought...

>In which case, if it's used in the commission of a crime, or nabbed on a
>tax disc/insurance camera then you'll be liable for the
>fines/points/prison :-(

This is not necessarily the case at all.  There are now statutory
obligations to notify the change of keeper (note, 'keeper', the
registration document makes no mention of 'owner'), however a common
denfence is "I sent it off then forgot about it.  Must have got lost
in the post".  This is impossilbe to disprove and therefore a highly
reliable defence.  

The police aren't stupid, in the case of a vehicle being used in the
course of an offence they'll easily tell, when they come around to see
you, whether or not you got rid of the vehicle as you claim :-)
Austin Shackles - 23 Feb 2005 17:40 GMT
>This is not necessarily the case at all.  There are now statutory
>obligations to notify the change of keeper (note, 'keeper', the
>registration document makes no mention of 'owner'), however a common
>denfence is "I sent it off then forgot about it.  Must have got lost
>in the post".  This is impossilbe to disprove and therefore a highly
>reliable defence.  

and, indeed, is what we'd mostly all do anyway.  I don't concern myself with
what happens after I post the document off.

Signature

Austin Shackles.  www.ddol-las.fsnet.co.uk  my opinions are just that
"There is plenty of time to win this game, and to thrash the Spaniards
too" Sir Francis Drake (1540? - 1596) Attr. saying when the Armarda was
sighted, 20th July 1588

SteveG <\ - 23 Feb 2005 20:39 GMT
>>Maybe it's still registered to you.
>
> Unlikely I'd have thought...

SG: But not impossible

>>In which case, if it's used in the commission of a crime, or nabbed on a
>>tax disc/insurance camera then you'll be liable for the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> in the post".  This is impossilbe to disprove and therefore a highly
> reliable defence.  

SG: I never mentioned ownership. The V5 only relates to the registered
keeper of a vehicle. Current legislation makes the keeper responsible
for notifying DVLA of changes not the owner.

> The police aren't stupid, in the case of a vehicle being used in the
> course of an offence they'll easily tell, when they come around to see
> you, whether or not you got rid of the vehicle as you claim :-)

SG: You're right, the Police aren't stupid ... which is why telling them
the documentation must have got lost in the post is unlikely to be taken
at face value. They may eventually be convinced to believe you but the
initial suspicion will fall on you ... it's easier than solving a real
cime after all :-)

My son px'd an old Montego for a Mondeo at a garage in Bristol some
years ago. The garage bloke said he'd deal with the DVLA side of things
and everything was fine until 15 months later when he got a summons
through the post. The Montego had been caught in a road tax camera in
Yeovil and they were demanding the back tax plus a fine. He contested
the charge and was visited by a couple of Bristol's finest (?) to take a
statement. They were very sceptical about his story even though I was
able to corroborate it (maybe that's why they were doubtful) and it was
only when he was able to locate the receipt he got from the garage that
they believed him. Fortunately, both DVLA and HM Customs & Excise then
took much more interest in the garage concerned than my lad, who got a
bollocking from some Inspector but nothing more. The garage owner did time.

Regards

Steve G
Larry - 23 Feb 2005 22:17 GMT
I did send off a letter to the DVLA some time later when I got the notice to
retax it, that I no longer had it and that to the best of my knowlege it was
being kept off road somewhere. I never herd from them after that.

Signature

?T

L'autisme c'est moi

"Space folds, and folded space bends, and bent folded space contracts and
expands unevenly in every way unconcievable except to someone who does not
believe in the laws of mathematics"

> This is not necessarily the case at all.  There are now statutory
> obligations to notify the change of keeper (note, 'keeper', the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> course of an offence they'll easily tell, when they come around to see
> you, whether or not you got rid of the vehicle as you claim :-)
"David G. Bell" - 24 Feb 2005 09:30 GMT
On Wednesday, in article
    <qq7p111ch9f51425qocai6ol7h6khav209@4ax.com>

> >Maybe it's still registered to you.
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> course of an offence they'll easily tell, when they come around to see
> you, whether or not you got rid of the vehicle as you claim :-)

We had a vehicle which was an insurance write-off after a minor
collision -- it doesn't take much on these modern things with no chassis
when they get a bit of age to sap the value -- which was disposed of via
the insurance company.

The numberplate popped up in connection with some sort of fraud/theft on
the south coast.

My brother's similarly dead car popped up on a speed camera down London
way.  (The insurance were going to fix it until they noticed the engine
had acquired a crack, as well as the front grille getting shoved in.  
Maybe somebody had a good engine from a rear-ended vehicle, but they
didn't do the paperwork right if they did.)

There's a lot of fake plates about.

Signature

David G. Bell -- SF Fan, Filker, and Punslinger.

"I am Number Two," said Penfold.  "You are Number Six."

MVP - 23 Feb 2005 17:42 GMT
>Maybe it's still registered to you.
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>Steve G

surely if it was still registered to him then he'll have been
recieving the road tax notices?

Regards.
Mark.(AKA, Mr.Nice.)
Signature

_________________________________________
1984 110 CSW 2.5(na)D
(3,000 rivets flying in close formation)
www.4x4info.info
www.mvp-fine-art.co.uk
www.markvarleyphoto.co.uk
_________________________________________

SteveG <\ - 23 Feb 2005 20:25 GMT
Larry didn't say how long ago he'd sold the vehicle so maybe the RFL
isn't due yet. On the whole though, I think you're right.

The point I was trying to make was that it is risky to assume that the
buyer will send off the V5 to DVLA and that under current legislation
the person named as the registered keeper is responsible for ensuring
that it is "properly registered and licensed". The current V5C document
states "The Registered Keeper will continue to be liable for the vehicle
until DVLA is informed of the keeper change".

Regards

Steve G

> surely if it was still registered to him then he'll have been
> recieving the road tax notices?
>
> Regards.
> Mark.(AKA, Mr.Nice.)
EMB - 23 Feb 2005 21:07 GMT
SteveG <"s.goodfellow"@blueyonder dot> wrote:

> The point I was trying to make was that it is risky to assume that the
> buyer will send off the V5 to DVLA and that under current legislation
> the person named as the registered keeper is responsible for ensuring
> that it is "properly registered and licensed". The current V5C document
> states "The Registered Keeper will continue to be liable for the vehicle
> until DVLA is informed of the keeper change".

The current NZ system is that the buyer is responsible for "Change of
Ownership" (equivalent to the V5).  However the official line is that
you don't part with the vehicle until proof of the change having been
made is provided to you.  As the change can be done at any Post Office
and many WOF (=MOT) testing stations, or eeven online now it's not too
arduous.

There's also a disposal form the seller can post off notifying the
change, but in typical beauracratic style they seem to file these in the
bin without looking at them, and anyway once you've sighted the transfer
receipt it's pretty irrelevant.

http://www.ltsa.govt.nz/vehicle-ownership/dont-get-stung.html

Signature

EMB

Larry - 23 Feb 2005 22:23 GMT
Got rid of it in June 02 and got a reminder to tax it the following month,
as I got rid of it just before the tax ran out.

I wrote to them saying I did not know who now had it, and I have not had any
reminders since so I presume someone else has taxed it since.

Signature

?T

L'autisme c'est moi

"Space folds, and folded space bends, and bent folded space contracts and
expands unevenly in every way unconcievable except to someone who does not
believe in the laws of mathematics"

> Larry didn't say how long ago he'd sold the vehicle so maybe the RFL
> isn't due yet. On the whole though, I think you're right.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Steve G
SteveG <\ - 23 Feb 2005 23:11 GMT
Hi Larry, seems quite likely that the new owner did indeed notify DVLA
of the change but I'd be a bit more careful in the future. You might not
be so lucky next time :-)

Regards

Steve G

> Got rid of it in June 02 and got a reminder to tax it the following month,
> as I got rid of it just before the tax ran out.
>
> I wrote to them saying I did not know who now had it, and I have not had any
> reminders since so I presume someone else has taxed it since.
Larry - 24 Feb 2005 18:43 GMT
Incedentally just got my new style registration document through the post
today, now where did I put it ?

Signature

Larry
Series 3 rust and holes

> Hi Larry, seems quite likely that the new owner did indeed notify DVLA
> of the change but I'd be a bit more careful in the future. You might not
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Steve G
dale hammond - 27 Feb 2005 22:56 GMT
thankyou all for your help i have sent the forms off now but if any body has
had similar experiance with dvla and are willing to e mail the details i
will with there permission print these off and produce the statements in
court to show that the dvla are not belond fault i several cases and they
therefore should reconsider their registration procedure

i can be e-mail either via the newsgroup or at
spamdalechammond@yahoospam.com   please remove the spam's
> Got rid of it in June 02 and got a reminder to tax it the following month,
> as I got rid of it just before the tax ran out.
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>>
>> Steve G
Andrew Renshaw - 24 Feb 2005 09:02 GMT
Hi Dale,

With the DVLA they have an interesting way of working. You have to prove you
are innocent otherwise you are guilty.

First of all write to them explaining what has happened and explain that you
have the portion of the log book. You then need to detail the rough date
that you sent it to them and the date you sold the vehicle. Explain that you
are able to get statements from friends and family that you no longer have
this vehicle.

Ask them the simple question, "Why has it taken this long to taken action
against you?"

Do non of this via telephone, I know to my cost that phone calls can be
denied and details not detailed on the computer.

Explain also in the letter that as you know you are innocent that you  are
willing to appear in court and mount a rigorous defence.

Make sure you send the letter via "Next day guarnteed delivery." It costs a
fortune but it is handled seperately from normal post and is almost 100%
going to get there, it will cost about ?3.50. Recorded delivery is placed in
with normal post and about 30% are not signed for and just posted through
the letterbox.

If the court date is soon, attend the court and plead "Not guilty." Ask for
a trial and explain that you intend to produce witnesses and witness
statements that you no longer own this vehicle. Explain that you have
discharged your legal duty in informing the DVLA and you cannot be liable
for the inefficiency of the Post Office.

DVLA tend to do about 20 cases at once with the majority of people declaring
guilty via post. Make sure you attend court (do not plead nto guilty via
post) and make yourself known to an usher and that you wish to enter a plea.
The magistrate may deal with you there an dthen, if this is the case ask for
a postponement as you need to prepare a proper and adequate defence. (Do not
take a solicitor with you at this hearing, it makes you look like you are
guilty, I know it shouldn't, but it does).

If you are set a trial date and DVLA still insists on a prosection - then
get as many witnesses to appear in court and write sworn statements as
possible. Present all you evidence in a calm polite manner respecting the
bench and using all the proper titles. make sure you question DVLA regarding
the following areas:-

"Why has it taken so long to issue a summons and why were you not contacted
before this date?"

"Have they monitored how many of the letters addressed to them are lost in
the post?"

"Have they taken this up with the Post Office and registered a complaint,
ask them to specify dates?"

"Can they produce any evidence that this vehicle has been stopped by the
Police or been issued with a Speed Camera fine since the date that you sent
the details to DVLA?" Explain that with the new mobile camera technology for
reading tax discs that this would be highly unlikely for the vehicle not to
be detected on the road.

I expect that the magistrate will find in your favour. Then submit to the
court a request for costs:-

Time taken ?7 per hour, including gathering evidence - Say ?210

Postage and Stationary:     ?15

Telephone calls ?4

Making a total of ?229.

I hope you win your case.

Andrew

P.S. I just phoned DVLA as I scrapped a vehicle on the 21st of August last
year and haven't received any documentation. Even though I had received
nothing from them it seems on the computer I no longer own the vehicle.
PHEW.

>i have been sent a summons to court for a vehicle i sold in aug 2003 i
>informed dvla of the new owner at the time but they have no record of it
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> else had any experiance like this and know the best way forward will
> witness statements be enought
Dave Liquorice - 24 Feb 2005 19:57 GMT
> P.S. I just phoned DVLA as I scrapped a vehicle on the 21st of
> August last year and haven't received any documentation. Even though
> I had received  nothing from them it seems on the computer I no
> longer own the vehicle. PHEW.

As you said your self phone calls can be denied and who trusts
computers... I hope you asked for written confirmation that you are no
longer the registered keeper, I know I would.

Signature

Cheers                                              new5pam@howhill.com
Dave.                                             pam is missing e-mail

Austin Shackles - 24 Feb 2005 20:55 GMT
>With the DVLA they have an interesting way of working. You have to prove you
>are innocent otherwise you are guilty.

increasingly and depressingly common trend these days in the so-called free
world.

Signature

Austin Shackles.  www.ddol-las.fsnet.co.uk  my opinions are just that
"Would to God that we might spend a single day really well!"
Thomas À Kempis (1380 - 1471) Imitation of Christ, I.xxiii.

dale hammond - 25 Feb 2005 11:25 GMT
do you think i should attempt to track the new owner down
>i have been sent a summons to court for a vehicle i sold in aug 2003 i
>informed dvla of the new owner at the time but they have no record of it
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> else had any experiance like this and know the best way forward will
> witness statements be enought
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.