Car Forum / Lexus Cars / September 2005
Dont buy a luxury car if you cant afford it.
|
|
Thread rating:  |
W. Wells - 28 Aug 2005 13:41 GMT Part of having a " luxury" car is being able to maintain it. If you can't afford the car you should be driving something more standard. Most people don't realize that luxury cars are expensive to maintain, provide good insurance, and pay taxes. Thats why they are called "luxury". Maybe it isn't time for you to be owning a luxury car. These are some of the same people who owe big balances on the credit cards and have no money in their savings account.
Viperkiller - 29 Aug 2005 05:33 GMT >Part of having a " luxury" car is being able to maintain it. If you can't >afford the car you should be driving something more standard. Most people [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >who owe big balances on the credit cards and have no money in their savings >account. I concur. I'm not an elitist by any stretch of the imagination. People should just realize that luxury cars may be in a different market than they are. It's just a shame to see such a well engineered vehicle desecrated.
Here's the point to those that don't get it: Luxury cars are better than your standard cars because they're built with more expensive materials and/or technology. If you're going to put cheaper materials on them, then the standard cars are more comensurate of your budget.
Don't want to pay premium fuel for the LS400? I suggest purchasing an old Cressida or perhaps the Avalon. Don't want to put iridium plugs on the ES330? Then the V6 Camry seems more appropriate for your need.
Luxury cars shouldn't be purchased to boast it to your neighbors. It should be something you purchase when your income reflects it accordingly.
Totaltully - 29 Aug 2005 07:53 GMT Interesting thoughts. But these are more relevant in a BMW or Mercedes forum. I bought a lexus for its lowest cost to own - incl. resale and repairs. If buying a car can be an investment, this comes closest. This forum is made of people of various types - old world luxury owners, smart buyers, penny pinchers and DIYers. Let people make their own choices on what and when to buy and dispose of.
Viperkiller - 30 Aug 2005 05:27 GMT > Let people make their own choices on what and when to buy and dispose of. That's obvious. It doesn't mean that I can't express my opinion. It doesn't mean that I'm going to lobby to have a federal law mandate what I say either. People can read what I wrote and form their own opinions.
Tom Waters - 07 Sep 2005 01:04 GMT Amen! Buy what you want! We do not decide what you can afford.
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 29 Aug 2005 11:23 GMT > Here's the point to those that don't get it: Luxury cars are better > than your standard cars because they're built with more expensive > materials and/or technology. No they're not. A Lexus ES300 is, mechanically, a Camry. An Acura is a Honda. A Lincoln is a Ford. That they sell them in different dealerships and put better interiors in them doesn't mean that the guy who does Camry oil changes can't do a Lexus oil change.
Lexus is calling. They want you to do commercials for them.
Viperkiller - 30 Aug 2005 05:35 GMT >> Here's the point to those that don't get it: Luxury cars are better >> than your standard cars because they're built with more expensive [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > >Lexus is calling. They want you to do commercials for them. What you're talking about are some mechanical items they share. That's undeniable. What I'm talking about are the items that they don't share. Things such as the luxury appointments. Do you really think that the materials of the seats are equal? Do you think that the Nakamichi system in the Lexus ES will even bolt in to a Camry?
It behoove your budget to have the ES oil changes at a Toyota dealer. I'm not saying you shouldn't. With that in mind, it seems fatuous to me to purchase a GS430, for example, and go to Discount Auto parts for brake pads.
Bo Yancey - 27 Sep 2005 06:21 GMT >> Here's the point to those that don't get it: Luxury cars are better >> than your standard cars because they're built with more expensive [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Lexus is calling. They want you to do commercials for them. Ha. Go read the Wiring Diagram. Go 'plonk' the sheet metal (it's different) :-). You haven't really driven them, have you?
Dan J.S. - 29 Aug 2005 16:05 GMT >>Part of having a " luxury" car is being able to maintain it. If you can't >>afford the car you should be driving something more standard. Most people [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > should be something you purchase when your income reflects it > accordingly. Lexus cars are TOYOTAS - same engine, same tranny... whats different? an extra coat of paint, better suspension, but over all, the Lexus brand is same as Toyota but maybe a little more cushy... yeah the SC430 is a stand alone, and so is the LS430, but over all, the ES330 has the same engine as the Camry... i am not sure why one would have iridium plugs... its just a scam...
and anyway, a luxury Japanese car is a little bit of an oxymoron... most people buy a Lexus because it is more reliable (they are made in Japan - except for the Rx330)... not really because its Luxurious... you buy a BMW, or Mercedes for a status... Lexus is no status symbol, it just means you are smart about reliability and want that extra comfortable ride...
Viperkiller - 30 Aug 2005 05:48 GMT >Lexus cars are TOYOTAS - same engine, same tranny... whats different? an >extra coat of paint, better suspension, but over all, the Lexus brand is >same as Toyota but maybe a little more cushy... yeah the SC430 is a stand >alone, and so is the LS430, but over all, the ES330 has the same engine as >the Camry... i am not sure why one would have iridium plugs... its just a >scam... Lexus are no doubt Toyotas. Engines and transmissions are not similar but not exactly the same. The SC didn't used to be a stand alone. A derivative of the original was used for the Supra.
If you believe that iridium plugs are scams, this may be a bit over you but I'll attempt to edify you anyway. The smaller tip better ensures a better burn characteristic. This becomes more important as the pressure in the chamber rises such as high compression engines or boosted engines. Although most gains are seen in forced induction engines, there are minimal gains in normally aspirated engines and more significant gains on emissions especially as the mileage wears on as iridium tips are harder than platinum tips. The same was said of platinum tips when they came out over copper plugs. Don't take my word for it. Do some research.
>and anyway, a luxury Japanese car is a little bit of an oxymoron... most >people buy a Lexus because it is more reliable (they are made in Japan - >except for the Rx330)... not really because its Luxurious... you buy a BMW, >or Mercedes for a status... Lexus is no status symbol, it just means you are >smart about reliability and want that extra comfortable ride... I agree with you that Lexus is the better buy because they are made in Japan and so are the parts, if you can afford it. There are people who also think that it shows you have a lot of money (hence the status symbol). I don't care for it myself. I drive them because I like what they do for me, not to try to impress my neighbors.
GRL - 05 Sep 2005 02:32 GMT Hey, the only car platform shared by Toyota/Lexus us the ES. That leaves the IS, GS, and LS as in no significant way related mechanically. Supposedly in the next generation the ES and Camry link will be broken. Maybe then this Lexus is "only" a Toyota whining will finally end. For some strange reason some German car heads just cannot stomach that Lexus (and recently Infiniti) make luxury cars that are better than the German brands. Go read the car books, and in every comparison the Japanese luxo cars win on content. They also are way more reliable than the German brands. (Not having to visit the dealer every few weeks - the ultimate luxury.) MB, BMW and Audi heads should be grateful to Lexus. Lexus slapped them upside their heads big-time in 1990 when the first LS rolled out and taught them the luxo barge buyers like reliability and a fair price, too. Just imagine how much more crappy the reliability of the German brands would be if the Japanese were not giving them plenty of competition. Lexus, Acura, and Infiniti are the best things that ever happened to German Car loyalists.
As for status symbols, to each his own. Me? I see a guy in an LS430, I think "Nice car, smart car to buy it." I see a MB S-Class I think "Poor bastard probably knows his service manager and the whole crew and maybe their families on a first name basis. Wonder if he has his own parking spot at the dealership?" I see a 7-Series and I think "Who is in charge at BMW that would let Bangle do that to their cars. Did Bangle have photos of the BMW board members doing naughty things with farm animals and black mail them with the pics?"
Cheers.
- nopcbs
>>>Part of having a " luxury" car is being able to maintain it. If you can't >>>afford the car you should be driving something more standard. Most people [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > BMW, or Mercedes for a status... Lexus is no status symbol, it just means > you are smart about reliability and want that extra comfortable ride... Elmo P. Shagnasty - 05 Sep 2005 02:43 GMT > Hey, the only car platform shared by Toyota/Lexus us the ES. That leaves the > IS, GS, and LS as in no significant way related mechanically. Supposedly in > the next generation the ES and Camry link will be broken. Maybe then this > Lexus is "only" a Toyota whining will finally end. No, it won't.
They will share core technologies and, of course, management. Only in the US do they separate the brands. Same goes for Honda.
shockel - 05 Sep 2005 06:08 GMT After my initial warranty is up i will peform my own service on my ls430.
 Signature shockel
GRL - 06 Sep 2005 03:03 GMT Actually, Toyota split off the Lexus brand in Japan recently. I think they did that in Europe some time ago. I read Britts posting messages about Lexi, so I figure it must be a separate brand there. Personally I don't care. If it said "Toyota" instead of Lexus on our LS400, it would be just as good a car and I'd be just as happy with it. I don't even care about the dealership pampering buyers. Not my thing.
Edmunds says this about the next generation ES...
What We Know: The 2007 Lexus ES 330 will be fully redesigned, with a brand-new chassis, sheet metal, and a brand-new, more luxurious cabin than even that of the current version of this step-up sedan. As the upcoming 2007 Camry is expected to have been revised to look more like a contemporary Lexus, one can only guess at what Toyota has in store for the next-generation of its platform-mate, the ES 330. The two vehicles will undoubtedly share many of their components, though, and Toyota has even created a new global platform, the MC, in order to build these two vehicles, and others, on. The 2007 ES 330 is due out around roughly the same time as the 2007 Camry, in the spring of 2006. As is the case with the Camry, expect the hybrid ES 330 to make its debut some time after the standard version of the vehicle, probably some time in 2007.
So, the Camry and ES will still share a platform. I stand corrected.
- GRL
>> Hey, the only car platform shared by Toyota/Lexus us the ES. That leaves >> the [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > They will share core technologies and, of course, management. Only in > the US do they separate the brands. Same goes for Honda. Gary Walker - 05 Sep 2005 08:36 GMT I don't own a Lexus, Acura, Infiniti, MB, BMW, or any other vehicle classified as luxury, as defined in this discussion.
However, fro what little I know about them, I would have to agree with these comments. I think the Lexus/Infiniti are probably much better vehicles than MB/BMW.
I've heard many stories on MB, and to a lesser degree, BMW, about maintenance/serviceability issues.
Additionally, I would add that the Lincoln competitor in this model group(I think it called LS) has impressed me as a world class vehicle.
Thanks,
Gary
> Hey, the only car platform shared by Toyota/Lexus us the ES. That leaves the > IS, GS, and LS as in no significant way related mechanically. Supposedly in [quoted text clipped - 65 lines] > > BMW, or Mercedes for a status... Lexus is no status symbol, it just means > > you are smart about reliability and want that extra comfortable ride... AndyK. - 29 Aug 2005 20:37 GMT >>Part of having a " luxury" car is being able to maintain it. If you can't >>afford the car you should be driving something more standard. Most people [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > should be something you purchase when your income reflects it > accordingly. I took my wife's ES330 to a Lexus dealer to have an error code cleared. The car was promptly driven next door to a Toyota dealer for the work to be done. What kind of statement was that? Does Lexus oil cost more? Is the drain plug harder to find?
It cost more to maintain my Ducati, that I can understand and live with. Why should it cost more to maintain something that is basically the same running gear as American Toyotas Camry?
I bought my wife a Lexus for the reliability, not to tell my neighbors that I had more money in the bank then them.
BTW, the error code was as BS code for the emissions that I was told should not have occurred. Also, I liked driving the car until the "learning" curve kicked in.
Viperkiller - 30 Aug 2005 05:59 GMT >I took my wife's ES330 to a Lexus dealer to have an error code cleared. The >car was promptly driven next door to a Toyota dealer for the work to be [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >should it cost more to maintain something that is basically the same running >gear as American Toyotas Camry? I didn't say to always bring the car in to the Lexus dealer for service for what a Toyota dealer can do for less money. If you read what I wrote carefully, you will never see that. What I was talking about was putting lower octane fuel and putting aftermarket parts on it. I don't consider a Toyota Camry oil filter an aftermarket part on the Lexus ES330. (Also read my responses to others).
As a matter of fact, I do believe that Lexus dealers are very highly priced when it comes to service. They have a smaller, more meticulous clientele that they have to cater to. Their overhead is higher so they charge more. Is it worth it? Not for me. I work on my own cars, thank you. They only see me at the dealer for vehicle purchases, warranty items (hasn't happened yet), and OEM parts that are not available at the Toyota dealers.
>I bought my wife a Lexus for the reliability, not to tell my neighbors that >I had more money in the bank then them. > >BTW, the error code was as BS code for the emissions that I was told should >not have occurred. Also, I liked driving the car until the "learning" curve >kicked in. If you wish to clear a code from your car again, try pulling the fuse(s) to the ECU for about 30 seconds. Works for me everytime...that is if the problem is merely an aberration and not a mechanical failure.
Jim Tiberio - 04 Sep 2005 06:38 GMT >>>Part of having a " luxury" car is being able to maintain it. If you can't >>>afford the car you should be driving something more standard. Most people [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > Why should it cost more to maintain something that is basically the same > running gear as American Toyotas Camry? That's pretty funny, after reading all the posts I planned on making a Ducati/Honda comparison but figured not many would get it. Nice bike anyway!
> I bought my wife a Lexus for the reliability, not to tell my neighbors > that I had more money in the bank then them. > > BTW, the error code was as BS code for the emissions that I was told > should not have occurred. Also, I liked driving the car until the > "learning" curve kicked in. Jim Tiberio - 04 Sep 2005 06:32 GMT >>Part of having a " luxury" car is being able to maintain it. If you can't >>afford the car you should be driving something more standard. Most people [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > should be something you purchase when your income reflects it > accordingly. Lemme guess, your 1974 Dodge Dart with the non-functional hood scoop is your 'Viperkiller'.
Viperkiller - 06 Sep 2005 03:47 GMT >Lemme guess, your 1974 Dodge Dart with the non-functional hood scoop is your >'Viperkiller'. Wrong guess. I have a modified 1994 Supra Turbo.
HarleyVa@nospam.com - 08 Sep 2005 00:19 GMT >>Lemme guess, your 1974 Dodge Dart with the non-functional hood scoop is your >>'Viperkiller'. > >Wrong guess. I have a modified 1994 Supra Turbo. Niiiccceee!
Jim - 30 Aug 2005 05:00 GMT I assume this post was the result of our many questions on how NOT to spend a fortune on our vehicles. I guess that what you're trying to say is that you're not worthy of a Lexus unless you have big bucks. As Dan J.S. clearly stated, the Lexus isn't a status symbol; it's just a Toyota with comfy leather seats, an impressive interior, an outstanding suspension, and great resale value. Why would I choose to spend $200+ on parts when I can find them on Ebay at half the price? Here in Puerto Rico, I purchased my '98 ES300 at the same price I could've purchased a '98 Camry. Not only that, but finding any seven-year old car with 40k miles is virtually impossible. Honestly, who would've chosen the Camry instead? And finally, why would I care what people around me think? It's not like they'll be chipping in to pay my bill...
> Part of having a " luxury" car is being able to maintain it. If you can't > afford the car you should be driving something more standard. Most people [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > who owe big balances on the credit cards and have no money in their savings > account. Fred T. - 30 Aug 2005 17:55 GMT >Part of having a " luxury" car is being able to maintain it. If you can't >afford the car you should be driving something more standard. Most people [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >who owe big balances on the credit cards and have no money in their savings >account. I'm curious to know what you guys think about the Total Cost of Ownership amounts on the Edmunds site... whether or not they are accurate or not.
Because from what I can tell, the TCO of "luxury" make such as Acura or Lexus at the low $30k range should not be significantly higher than the TCO for a non-luxury make in a similar price range... for example compare Nissan Maxima to Infiniti G35.
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 31 Aug 2005 02:43 GMT > I'm curious to know what you guys think about the Total Cost of > Ownership amounts on the Edmunds site... whether or not they are [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > the TCO for a non-luxury make in a similar price range... for example > compare Nissan Maxima to Infiniti G35. You're right.
On the other hand, the TCO for a luxury make like a BMW 7 is way high, because that puppy is worth only about $15K five years later.
Ackerman - 03 Sep 2005 00:06 GMT I purchased a 1990 LS400 about 4 years ago for $11,000. It had 70,000 miles on it. It now has 160,000 and I've spent about $2500 on maintenance items (other than routine, such as tires and brakes). It's probably now worth $4,000. That comes down to $200/month. A new Chevy costs more than that.
 Signature This e-mail and attachments were scanned by McAfee VirusScan, version 9.0
> Part of having a " luxury" car is being able to maintain it. If you can't > afford the car you should be driving something more standard. Most people [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > people who owe big balances on the credit cards and have no money in their > savings account.
|
|
|