>I just saw the new 2007 ES350 at an auto show. I am underwhemed! It is
> just not exciting. I had hoped for a little panache, but this vehicle
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Impartial
"If they just keep making them the best" is a fair argument. However,
I'm not convinced the ES series has been at the top of the list for
reliability, given the widespread transmission/shifting complaints. For
instance, Consumer Reports magazine, in the new 2006 annual auto
edition, seems to rate recent ES models lower than some cheaper Toyota
and Honda vehicles. The latest ES 330 scores highly, but NOT perfectly.
Still, my argument is not with Lexus ES reliability. Rather it is with
the lackluster styling of the new ES350. I repeat, this new ES is a new
benchmark in boring design.
If Toyota/Lexus is vulnerable and lacking it is most certainly IMHO in
the styling and design department, at least with sedans. They are
SERIOUSLY trailing BMW and Mercedes in that repect. Again, just one
former Lexus owner's opinion. Impartial (but not on this issue)
GLitwinski - 23 Mar 2006 01:27 GMT
You think the ES is more boring than the current Merc C class it competes
with?
Huh? You are kidding, right? I say they are at parity.
> "If they just keep making them the best" is a fair argument. However,
> I'm not convinced the ES series has been at the top of the list for
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> SERIOUSLY trailing BMW and Mercedes in that repect. Again, just one
> former Lexus owner's opinion. Impartial (but not on this issue)
Just Me - 23 Mar 2006 20:41 GMT
Yes, most definitely! I'd say Mercedes is far, far ahead of Lexus on
styling ... as far ahead as Lexus is over Mercedes on reliability. I'm
not the first to say it, but I concur: Lexus products have no soul or
style compared to the Mercedes and BMWs. Lexus has a very timid, almost
generic sense of exterior design. Perhaps understated or muted design
themes ...but lately too boring to be called sophisticated. Still I
admit it's just one car shopper's opinion. I had a '98 ES300 that was a
truly great car, and still looks far better to me than the newest ES350.
Impartial (most of the time)
W. Wells - 23 Mar 2006 13:06 GMT
It may "just you" If I were you I would just pick another model or make.
> "If they just keep making them the best" is a fair argument. However,
> I'm not convinced the ES series has been at the top of the list for
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> SERIOUSLY trailing BMW and Mercedes in that repect. Again, just one
> former Lexus owner's opinion. Impartial (but not on this issue)
Norskey@webtv.net - 23 Mar 2006 20:10 GMT
I'd suggest you look at the restyled Toyota Avalon Limited, which
appears to have everything the new ES350 will have, and maybe more. It
might be a few thousand less, around $35,000 list, and I personally
think it looks better than the bland new Lexus ES. Larger, too.
Oddly, the Avalon is faster than the new ES accellerating 0-60, based on
published test statistics. The stats are not from the same source, but
did show the Avalon to be a half second or more faster, as I recall. N
Garry Owen - 25 Mar 2006 18:59 GMT
>I'd suggest you look at the restyled Toyota Avalon Limited, which
>appears to have everything the new ES350 will have, and maybe more. It
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>published test statistics. The stats are not from the same source, but
>did show the Avalon to be a half second or more faster, as I recall. N
The new 2007 ES is now based on the Avalon and not the Camry as in the
past. Much change in the suspension, some in the engine, and the
transmission is different (If I remember correctly)
IFCAR - 25 Mar 2006 22:52 GMT
Garry Owen Wrote:
> >I'd suggest you look at the restyled Toyota Avalon Limited, which
> >appears to have everything the new ES350 will have, and maybe more.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> past. Much change in the suspension, some in the engine, and the
> transmission is different (If I remember correctly)
The Avalon is also Camry-based, but the ES is closer in size to the
Camry than to the Avalon.

Signature
IFCAR