> Ray and others who responded to my posts,,
>
> Thanks very much. Your insights were very helpful.
>
> Sincerely,
> Alan
You are very welcome!

Signature
Ray O
(correct punctuation to reply)
I have the film on my car, and it was WELL worth the expense for me,
considering my commute is all interstate. Without the film, I'd be doing
paint touchups just about every day. As far as price, I paid around $500
for the front bumper, hood, headlights, side mirrors, and rear bumper. On
my headlights, the installer used a thicker material by X-Pel that
absolutely prevents lens breakage from anything short of a direct hit by a
boulder. He also used LLumar product instead of 3m. I dealt directly with
an authorized film installer instead of purchasing through a dealership.
From what I understand, the dealerships would charge like $1000 for the same
thing. I read Ray's post about not wanting to pay $300 for it, but here's
how I justified my expense. An unsightly black front-end bra, which damages
the paint over time and is maintenance-intensive, especially after it rains,
was something like $200 or $250. To me, the extra couple of hundred bucks
is well worth paying. It is a completely maintenance and worry-free
solution, and I strongly recommend it. Just do some research in your area
first to find a qualified installer, and you could price- compare against
the dealership's pricing. The biggest problem I have seen, at least in my
area, is a lack of many qualified installers for this type of product. A
nice bonus about the film, when you go to sell your car one day, you can
peel it off, and the front end will look factory fresh.
Check out these sites for info:
http://www.xpel.com/
http://www.llumar.com/na-eng/Automotive/auto.html
> Ray and others who responded to my posts,,
>
> Thanks very much. Your insights were very helpful.
>
> Sincerely,
> Alan
cnewton--removethis@akamail.net - 19 Apr 2007 17:34 GMT
>I have the film on my car, and it was WELL worth the expense for me,
>considering my commute is all interstate. Without the film, I'd be doing
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>boulder. He also used LLumar product instead of 3m. I dealt directly with
>an authorized film installer instead of purchasing through a dealership.
I have the film on my A4 and thought it was so beneficial I had them
add it to my wife's RX330 when we purchased it.
We got ours through the Lexus dealership and it has saved the front
end from rock chips. I went with the dealerships because I have seen
some of the tint places go out of business and if you have any
warranty issues, it is easier because you just call the dealer. Ours
was $499 through the dealer.
In Colorado, the road crews generally use sand instead of salt and
rock chips are the norm; the invisible bra has prevented this from
happening.
YMMV.
Ray O - 19 Apr 2007 18:16 GMT
>I have the film on my car, and it was WELL worth the expense for me,
>considering my commute is all interstate. Without the film, I'd be doing
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> http://www.xpel.com/
> http://www.llumar.com/na-eng/Automotive/auto.html
Interesting post! I am a cheapskate, and based on my dealings with
dealerships, I tend to be skeptical of dealership aftermarket add-ons. I
agree that front-end bras or masks tend to cause more damage than they
prevent, and those Lexan hood shields do not help the appearance of a car.
I guess I should think about the film ;-)

Signature
Ray O
(correct punctuation to reply)
Steve Larson - 20 Apr 2007 21:57 GMT
It may not be for everyone, but it sure has been a blessing for me.
>>I have the film on my car, and it was WELL worth the expense for me,
>>considering my commute is all interstate. Without the film, I'd be doing
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> prevent, and those Lexan hood shields do not help the appearance of a car.
> I guess I should think about the film ;-)