Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Lexus Cars / April 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Ping: to RayO

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
AlanW - 17 Apr 2007 18:56 GMT
Dear Ray,

I value your opinions and advice in this news group. Any thoughts on
this?

"I will take delivery of an ES350 in about two weeks. While at the
dealer, I received a "preview" of some of the products they will offer
when I take delivery.

The first one is a glass treatment known as "Diamon-Fusion" (
www.diamon-fusionusa.com )which protects windshields from chips and
cracks and also allows water to run off instantly.

The other is "Scotchgard Paint Protection Film" (
www.3m.com/PaintProtectionFilm ). This is a high-grade urethane film
that is applied to the front bumper, mirror backs,  and the front half
of the hood to reduce paint chips and bug damage.

I would welcome comments and insights about these products pro or con.
Are they worth the extra cost?"

Thanks. // Alan
old man - 17 Apr 2007 20:06 GMT
RainX does the same thing, for rain/dirt, and can be purchased / applied by
anyone
about $2 a bottle this side of the pond - it works, drive in rain without
using the wypers, as used by airforce

> Dear Ray,
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Thanks. // Alan
Ray O - 17 Apr 2007 23:40 GMT
> Dear Ray,
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> dealer, I received a "preview" of some of the products they will offer
> when I take delivery.

> The first one is a glass treatment known as "Diamon-Fusion" (
> www.diamon-fusionusa.com )which protects windshields from chips and
> cracks and also allows water to run off instantly.

I would pass on the Diamon-Fusion unless the dealer is applying it for free.
The fact that something is patented does not mean that it is effective or a
good investment.

> The other is "Scotchgard Paint Protection Film" (
> www.3m.com/PaintProtectionFilm ). This is a high-grade urethane film
> that is applied to the front bumper, mirror backs,  and the front half
> of the hood to reduce paint chips and bug damage.

Toyota used to install a very similar film in areas that were vulnerable to
sandblasting, and it was very effective.  It is basically a transparent
decal.  A seam where the film ends will probably become visible, and you may
or may not like how the hood looks with the seam.  I would ask to see how it
looks when installed on another car.  As far as whether the film is worth it
or not depends on the cost.  I might pay $100 for it on my car; I would
definitely not pay $300 for it.  My guess is that the dealer will want $500
for it.

I would pass on any chemical "treatments," "coatings," "paint hardener," etc
for the rest of the car's paint and for the upholstery.  That stuff is
basically wax and Scotchguard.

Enjoy your new ride!
Signature


Ray O
(correct punctuation to reply)

AlanW - 18 Apr 2007 00:01 GMT
Ray and others who responded to my posts,,

Thanks very much. Your insights were very helpful.

Sincerely,
Alan
Ray O - 18 Apr 2007 00:18 GMT
> Ray and others who responded to my posts,,
>
> Thanks very much. Your insights were very helpful.
>
> Sincerely,
> Alan

You are very welcome!

Signature

Ray O
(correct punctuation to reply)

Steve Larson - 19 Apr 2007 16:12 GMT
I have the film on my car, and it was WELL worth the expense for me,
considering my commute is all interstate.  Without the film, I'd be doing
paint touchups just about every day.  As far as price, I paid around $500
for the front bumper, hood, headlights, side mirrors, and rear bumper.  On
my headlights, the installer used a thicker material by X-Pel that
absolutely prevents lens breakage from anything short of a direct hit by a
boulder.  He also used LLumar product instead of 3m.  I dealt directly with
an authorized film installer instead of purchasing through a dealership.
From what I understand, the dealerships would charge like $1000 for the same
thing.  I read Ray's post about not wanting to pay $300 for it, but here's
how I justified my expense.  An unsightly black front-end bra, which damages
the paint over time and is maintenance-intensive, especially after it rains,
was something like $200 or $250.  To me, the extra couple of hundred bucks
is well worth paying.  It is a completely maintenance and worry-free
solution, and I strongly recommend it.  Just do some research in your area
first to find a qualified installer, and you could price- compare against
the dealership's pricing.  The biggest problem I have seen, at least in my
area, is a lack of many qualified installers for this type of product.  A
nice bonus about the film, when you go to sell your car one day, you can
peel it off, and the front end will look factory fresh.

Check out these sites for info:
http://www.xpel.com/
http://www.llumar.com/na-eng/Automotive/auto.html

> Ray and others who responded to my posts,,
>
> Thanks very much. Your insights were very helpful.
>
> Sincerely,
> Alan
cnewton--removethis@akamail.net - 19 Apr 2007 17:34 GMT
>I have the film on my car, and it was WELL worth the expense for me,
>considering my commute is all interstate.  Without the film, I'd be doing
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>boulder.  He also used LLumar product instead of 3m.  I dealt directly with
>an authorized film installer instead of purchasing through a dealership.

I have the film on my A4 and thought it was so beneficial I had them
add it to my wife's RX330 when we purchased it.

We got ours through the Lexus dealership and it has saved the front
end from rock chips.  I went with the dealerships because I have seen
some of the tint places go out of business and if you have any
warranty issues, it is easier because you just call the dealer.  Ours
was $499 through the dealer.

In Colorado, the road crews generally use sand instead of salt and
rock chips are the norm; the invisible bra has prevented this from
happening.

YMMV.
Ray O - 19 Apr 2007 18:16 GMT
>I have the film on my car, and it was WELL worth the expense for me,
>considering my commute is all interstate.  Without the film, I'd be doing
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> http://www.xpel.com/
> http://www.llumar.com/na-eng/Automotive/auto.html

Interesting post!  I am a cheapskate, and based on my dealings with
dealerships, I tend to be skeptical of dealership aftermarket add-ons.  I
agree that front-end bras or masks tend to cause more damage than they
prevent, and those Lexan hood shields do not help the appearance of a car.
I guess I should think about the film ;-)
Signature


Ray O
(correct punctuation to reply)

Steve Larson - 20 Apr 2007 21:57 GMT
It may not be for everyone, but it sure has been a blessing for me.

>>I have the film on my car, and it was WELL worth the expense for me,
>>considering my commute is all interstate.  Without the film, I'd be doing
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> prevent, and those Lexan hood shields do not help the appearance of a car.
> I guess I should think about the film ;-)
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.