>Hey Dave W! What is your take on the sag in my car? I can tell you
>don't approve of anyone who says that Lexus is not perfect, but that
>is not particularly usefull unless you need reinforcement of your
>decision to buy a Lexus or series of them as some of us have done.
This johngdole character has repeatedly posted flat-out false
statements about various Lexus models as facts. I don't know his
motivation for this, but it's not "usefull".
He has also posted here in a Lexus newsgroup that people who buy them
are idiots. This is slightly different than saying Lexus isn't
perfect, wouldn't you say?
>The level of human engineering in the Lexus is low - look at a Mercedes
>for comparison.
I have no idea what that means - are Lexus using monkeys?
>Of course the Mercedes will break down a lot more
>often. In the first 25,000 miles that I owned the last MercedesS420, I
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>by "folks" who attack anyone who criticizes a Lexus for having major
>faults ...
I'd say that it is uncommon to have so many major problems with a
Lexus, and somewhat less uncommon with a Mercedes. Certainly, you're
not the first person who's been unhappy with their Lexus, but it
shouldn't surprise you that other Lexus owners who post here have
noticed that every time you show up here, it's with a generally
sarcastic rant about what a disappointment your car has been.
I think it's time you trade that lemon in for something that was
engineered by humans.
mcbrue - 03 Mar 2008 20:36 GMT
Dave W, thank you for your help with my sagging LS430. By human
engineering I meant engineering taking the human factors into account.
The engineering does not do that as well as the german engineering
does. For example, consider the windshield - glass too hard so the
wipers do not wipe cleanly and skip often; wrong angle so there is
lots of glare; a very short band of tint at the top so that too much
sun comes in; and next we can go to the windshield wipers if you want.
And you really should watch out - calling the Japanese engineers non-
humans is really not considered nice anymore.
St. John Smythe - 03 Mar 2008 21:36 GMT
> ...glass too hard so the
> wipers do not wipe cleanly and skip often...
Remarkable.

Signature
St. John
It is a sobering thought that when Mozart was my age, he had been
dead for two years.
-Tom Lehrer
johngdole@hotmail.com - 04 Mar 2008 05:05 GMT
Lexus was intended to imitate the American ride that Detroit hadn't
been able to build. But if GM could build them then why would people
want Lexus?
Even in GM's difficult turnaround the Cadillac division managed to
gain sales in 2007 vs Lexus' decline. The 08 CTS had a 73.5% Sep sales
gain over the 07!!! And Mercedes-Benz C-Class had a 31.2% gain. Well I
guess more people didn't want Lexus.
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/ford-gm-toyota-all-sell/story.aspx?guid=%7
B5D3BEE1B%2DEABC%2D4642%2DBB8F%2D78339D9574EE%7D&siteid=yhoof
http://thecarblogger.blogspot.com/2007/10/2008-cadillac-cts-leads-sales-numbers.html
> Dave W, thank you for your help with my sagging LS430. By human
> engineering I meant engineering taking the human factors into account.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> And you really should watch out - calling the Japanese engineers non-
> humans is really not considered nice anymore.
DaveW - 04 Mar 2008 13:03 GMT
>Lexus was intended to imitate the American ride that Detroit hadn't
>been able to build. But if GM could build them then why would people
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>gain over the 07!!! And Mercedes-Benz C-Class had a 31.2% gain. Well I
>guess more people didn't want Lexus.
As usual, you guess wrong. As the saying goes, you use statistics like
a drunken man uses lampposts - for support rather than illumination.
Do you honestly believe Cadillac sells anywhere near as many cars as
Lexus? Not that I think popularity is any measure of quality, but if
you're going to make that argument, you look even more foolish than
usual.
Lexus sells more cars than Mercedes, and *far* more cars than
Cadillac.
And your latest post here is 79% stupider than your previous average.
GIga - 05 Mar 2008 23:00 GMT
Careful Dave -- you're getting involved in a battle of wits between unarmed
participants (Mr. Long Dong and the Brew-jerk)! Only bad things can happen
here...
<grin>
GIga
>>Lexus was intended to imitate the American ride that Detroit hadn't
>>been able to build. But if GM could build them then why would people
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> And your latest post here is 79% stupider than your previous average.