>My 2003 V6 went through the recalls. One was an overnighter at the dealership
>for the glue removal on the doors. The other replaced something in the fuel
>line.
Ahh... There's the difference. I've got the wife in a 4-cylinder vice
the V-6. Maybe powerplant issues more than anything else. (Glue
aside...)
'97 STO, "Chouki"
// Change TEJAS to TX to reply via eMail //
>> I've not had any complaints about the vehicle, and the only time she
>> complains is when I take the keys...
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> On the fifth CEL, the dealership refused to take the car.
They did, eh?
> They said
> it
> was not an issue but a firmware error. (I despise claims like this)
> They claimed the firmware was authored for Japanese driving habits and
> that the CEL was firing because I am an Amelican.
I despise claims like that as well and would have strongly encouraged them
to take another look at it.
> So I drove around with the very annoying check engine light glaring
> at me. Oddly enough, it went away on its own. It came back again for
> a short goodbye after which it's never been seen again.
>
> Dunno. At this point, don't care. I think the dealership refused to
> take it in because of lemon laws, but who knows.
Of course that's why they didn't want to take it in. What I don't understand
is how you claim that they "refused". Did they look you right in the eye and
tell you they wouldn't fix the car? Did they tell you they couldn't get it
in until next month?
I dunno about anyone else, but if a dealership looked me in the eye and
refused to service the brand new car I'd purchased from them, I'd have been
spitting nails.
> DESPITE all the minor annoyances and 5 of the 6 cylinders working, the
> Mazda6 has still been a very strong car. It has some of the best
> features and power to cost ratio that I've seen. I figure buying a
> new production car comes with these problems. But hopefully that's
> all of them.
I wouldn't bet on it--I may be only 26, but I do know that it's a bad idea
to assume your brand new car is just going through some growing pains.

Signature
tooloud
Remove nothing to reply...
Brian - 30 Jun 2004 16:05 GMT
> I dunno about anyone else, but if a dealership looked me in the eye and
> refused to service the brand new car I'd purchased from them, I'd have been
> spitting nails.
The explanation offered was that they could reset the CEL but little more
at that point. I believe them. They had already swapped most of the ignition
system. Plus I was tired of their cherry red Neon.
They would have fixed it if they knew how. And if they were guessing, I'd
prefer they experiment on someone else's car. The last thing I want is to
see my engine being pulled out of a car with 10000 miles on it.
The CELs started after a recall service, went away a month later, and
haven't reappeared. So if my choice is to push a repair from people
who have already demonstrated that they don't understand the problem
or observe the car, I'd go for the latter.
Wait and see approach. I think the lemon law spans time in the shop.
Not sure how resetting a CEL (which takes all of two minutes) relates.
It'd probably require a lawyer to make the dealership see the light.