Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Mazda / Mazda Miata / September 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Shocks & springs

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Eric Baber - 07 Sep 2004 09:30 GMT
I'm going to have my shock absorbers replaced on my 55,000 mile 1992 MX5
following various postings here saying that the shocks will be well and
truly dead by now (to my knowledge they're still the original ones - there's
no record of them having been replaced, and when braking hard the car
strongly pulls to the right which apparently is an indication of dead
shocks, right?) My question is whether to replace the springs as well while
I'm at it. Do the springs have a longer/indefinite life-span, or would it be
sensible to replace them at the same time as the shocks?

Thanks

Eric
Lanny Chambers - 07 Sep 2004 13:54 GMT
> when braking hard the car strongly pulls to the right which
> apparently is an indication of dead shocks, right?)

No. Check your caliper slider pins.

> My question is whether to replace the springs as well while
> I'm at it.

Not necessary. Springs don't wear out.

Signature

Lanny Chambers, St. Louis, USA
'94C
the alignment page:
http://www.hummingbirds.net/alignment.html

MLB - 07 Sep 2004 18:27 GMT
> I'm going to have my shock absorbers replaced on my 55,000 mile 1992
> MX5 following various postings here saying that the shocks will be
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Eric

Shocks have nothing to do with the car pulling to the right. THat's your
brakes.

Shocks may or may not be trashed at that mileage. If you push down on a
corner of the car and then let up does it come back up and stop or keep
bouncing? Springs are definitely not even close to sacked at that mileage.
Plenty of OEM springs with 155,000 that are still fine.
Get your brakes fixed!
Lanny Chambers - 08 Sep 2004 18:06 GMT
> Shocks may or may not be trashed at that mileage. If you push down on a
> corner of the car and then let up does it come back up and stop or keep
> bouncing?

FYI, that test doesn't work on a Miata. It won't bounce no matter how
bad the shocks are. If the rear bottoms in dips, the shocks are wasted.

Signature

Lanny Chambers, St. Louis, USA
'94C
the alignment page:
http://www.hummingbirds.net/alignment.html

Eric Baber - 09 Sep 2004 09:23 GMT
> FYI, that test doesn't work on a Miata. It won't bounce no matter how
> bad the shocks are. If the rear bottoms in dips, the shocks are wasted.

And it certainly does that!! Glad to hear I don't have to replace the
springs though.

Eric
Frank Berger - 09 Sep 2004 17:18 GMT
> > Shocks may or may not be trashed at that mileage. If you push down on a
> > corner of the car and then let up does it come back up and stop or keep
> > bouncing?
>
> FYI, that test doesn't work on a Miata. It won't bounce no matter how
> bad the shocks are. If the rear bottoms in dips, the shocks are wasted.

I have 80,000 miles on my '96.  It doesn't seem to bottom in dips.  So why
have my shocks lasted so much longer then they should accordiong to the
conventional wisdom?   I remember reading here that they're toast after
about 40,000 miles.  Is there a more rigorous method of testing the shocks
on a Miata?
Eric Baber - 10 Sep 2004 08:39 GMT
> I have 80,000 miles on my '96.  It doesn't seem to bottom in dips.  So why
> have my shocks lasted so much longer then they should accordiong to the
> conventional wisdom?   I remember reading here that they're toast after
> about 40,000 miles.

Does it perhaps depend on the type of driving you do? I would expect city
driving (with more potholes etc) to be rougher on shocks than, say, lots of
motorway driving - could that be the case? What type of driving do you
usually do?

Eric
Frank Berger - 11 Sep 2004 06:56 GMT
> > I have 80,000 miles on my '96.  It doesn't seem to bottom in dips.  So why
> > have my shocks lasted so much longer then they should accordiong to the
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Eric

Mixed.  Maybe my shocks are worn and I just don't realize it.
Iva - 11 Sep 2004 14:07 GMT
> Mixed.  Maybe my shocks are worn and I just don't realize it.

When I had the shocks replaced on my Miata,the difference in
handling was amazing .  It was also kind of an eye-opener when I
got out of her the first time - she sat at least an inch higher
off the ground!

Iva & Belle.)
'90B Classic Red.)
#3 winkin' Miata
Grant Edwards - 11 Sep 2004 15:48 GMT
>> Mixed.  Maybe my shocks are worn and I just don't realize it.
>
> When I had the shocks replaced on my Miata,the difference in
> handling was amazing .  It was also kind of an eye-opener when I
> got out of her the first time - she sat at least an inch higher
> off the ground!

You must have replaced the shocks with new ones that didn't
have the same geometry as the stock ones.  Normally, shock
replacement shouldn't change ride height.

Signature

Grant Edwards                   grante             Yow!  I'm thinking about
                                 at               DIGITAL READ-OUT systems
                              visi.com            and computer-generated
                                                  IMAGE FORMATIONS...

Lanny Chambers - 11 Sep 2004 18:23 GMT
> > When I had the shocks replaced on my Miata,the difference in
> > handling was amazing .  It was also kind of an eye-opener when I
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> have the same geometry as the stock ones.  Normally, shock
> replacement shouldn't change ride height.

It's common for new gas-pressurized shocks to ride high for awhile until
they settle. Unfortunately, it's also common for installers to torque
down the suspension bolts with the car still in the air, rather than
with its normal weight on the tires; this preloads the bushings, adding
to the effective spring rate.

Signature

Lanny Chambers, St. Louis, USA
'94C
the alignment page:
http://www.hummingbirds.net/alignment.html

Grant Edwards - 11 Sep 2004 18:34 GMT
>> You must have replaced the shocks with new ones that didn't
>> have the same geometry as the stock ones.  Normally, shock
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> tires; this preloads the bushings, adding to the effective
> spring rate.

I hadn't thought about that last point -- though I should have
after the contortions I had to go through to get a torque
wrench on those bolts with the car down off the jack stands.

Signature

Grant Edwards                   grante             Yow!  .. I think I'd
                                 at               better go back to my DESK
                              visi.com            and toy with a few common
                                                  MISAPPREHENSIONS...

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.