
Signature
Leon van Dommelen :) Bozo, the White 96 Sebring Miata .)
rammm@dommelen.net http://www.dommelen.net/miata
EXIT THE INTERSTATES (Jamie Jensen)
>>So - assuming your bypass assembly is working correctly and your sensors
>>are correctly connected, which are probably both true, you've just
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> to trick the ECU in delivering too much HC (gas). I would replace
> belt and idler pulley, retest, and take it from there.
If the s/c isn't generating boost and is bypassed, I'd rather expect
the fuel delivery to be about normal - regardless of the reason
why the S/C is bypassed. It seems it would need to be this way
for emissions approval in the first place. So, while your advice
is obviously sound, I tend to believe that the original poster
needs to prepare himself for the chance of replacing the O2 sensor
and/or the catalytic converter.
Of course, we're just guessing from a description in
a Usenet message ;-)
Dana
Leon van Dommelen - 23 Dec 2004 13:01 GMT
>>>So - assuming your bypass assembly is working correctly and your sensors
>>>are correctly connected, which are probably both true, you've just
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>the fuel delivery to be about normal - regardless of the reason
>why the S/C is bypassed.
No. The ECU is tricked into thinking that the air that is coming
through is at -40 C, hence dense, causing it to deliver more fuel
than it should.
> It seems it would need to be this way
>for emissions approval in the first place. So, while your advice
>is obviously sound, I tend to believe that the original poster
>needs to prepare himself for the chance of replacing the O2 sensor
>and/or the catalytic converter.
You are probably right here anyway. They both have obviously
seen a lot of abuse.
Leon
>Of course, we're just guessing from a description in
>a Usenet message ;-)
>
>Dana

Signature
Leon van Dommelen :) Bozo, the White 96 Sebring Miata .)
rammm@dommelen.net http://www.dommelen.net/miata
EXIT THE INTERSTATES (Jamie Jensen)