Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Mazda / Mazda Miata / December 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

failed emissions, jr/sc?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
picaza - 18 Dec 2004 13:58 GMT
hi,

yes connecticut once again has an emission program and my 95 miata
failed w/ high hydrocarbons, (185 vs a pass @ 167).  i am wondering if
this is due to the fact that the jr supercharger on the car froze an
idler wheel and shortly there after the belt.  i have ordered both parts
  and i am wondering if this is the only issue or if i should check for
something else.  btw: car has 97k on the clock and a resent valve job.
thanks,
peter
Dana H. Myers - 18 Dec 2004 18:24 GMT
> hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>   and i am wondering if this is the only issue or if i should check for
> something else.

Well, if your S/C nose pulley isn't spinning - and it won't be
without a belt on it - then you're not getting any boost.  With
no boost, you're in bypass mode all the time (assuming your bypass
valve and actuator are working correctly) and should not be seeing
any fuel enrichment at all.  My experience is limited to the NB system
which uses the JR Powercard for fuel enrichment - this system would
not be running rich under these conditions.

However, I do not know the tricks used for fuel management on the
older systems, which relied on manipulating sensor signals.  I suppose
it's possible that you could be seeing a problem if your bypass assembly
isn't working correctly but that's just speculation, and I suspect that
you'd be way down on power if the bypass valve wasn't in bypass mode.

So - assuming your bypass assembly is working correctly and your sensors
are correctly connected, which are probably both true, you've just
failed a test by being slightly over the limit.  It could be a catalytic
converter issue or ?

So I think you should check for something.

Dana
Leon van Dommelen - 19 Dec 2004 00:43 GMT
>> hi,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>failed a test by being slightly over the limit.  It could be a catalytic
>converter issue or ?

I would think the settings JR devised to get through CARB clearing
might not work as well if the SC is not acting normally.  JR is trying
to trick the ECU in delivering too much HC (gas).  I would replace
belt and idler pulley, retest, and take it from there.

Leon

Signature

Leon van Dommelen :)    Bozo, the White 96 Sebring Miata .)
rammm@dommelen.net            http://www.dommelen.net/miata
                 EXIT THE INTERSTATES       (Jamie Jensen)

Dana H. Myers - 22 Dec 2004 23:31 GMT
>>So - assuming your bypass assembly is working correctly and your sensors
>>are correctly connected, which are probably both true, you've just
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> to trick the ECU in delivering too much HC (gas).  I would replace
> belt and idler pulley, retest, and take it from there.

If the s/c isn't generating boost and is bypassed, I'd rather expect
the fuel delivery to be about normal - regardless of  the reason
why the S/C is bypassed.  It seems it would need to be this way
for emissions approval in the first place.  So, while your advice
is obviously sound, I tend to believe that the original poster
needs to prepare himself for the chance of replacing the O2 sensor
and/or the catalytic converter.

Of course, we're just guessing from a description in
a Usenet message ;-)

Dana
Leon van Dommelen - 23 Dec 2004 13:01 GMT
>>>So - assuming your bypass assembly is working correctly and your sensors
>>>are correctly connected, which are probably both true, you've just
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>the fuel delivery to be about normal - regardless of  the reason
>why the S/C is bypassed.

No.  The ECU is tricked into thinking that the air that is coming
through is at -40 C, hence dense, causing it to deliver more fuel
than it should.

>  It seems it would need to be this way
>for emissions approval in the first place.  So, while your advice
>is obviously sound, I tend to believe that the original poster
>needs to prepare himself for the chance of replacing the O2 sensor
>and/or the catalytic converter.

You are probably right here anyway.   They both have obviously
seen a lot of abuse.

Leon

>Of course, we're just guessing from a description in
>a Usenet message ;-)
>
>Dana

Signature

Leon van Dommelen :)    Bozo, the White 96 Sebring Miata .)
rammm@dommelen.net            http://www.dommelen.net/miata
                 EXIT THE INTERSTATES       (Jamie Jensen)

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.