>> Given that the dealer wanted $1100 for the job including $123 per shock
>> (now that's shocking) and I can get 4 KYB GR-2's which are probably
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Pat
$89 per hour. They had no chance to sell me the shock replacement, but they
didn't know that. They *are* honest, as far as I can tell. Town North
Mazda, Richardson, Texas.
They also told me a while back when I had my timing belt replaced that they
don't necessarily recommend replacing the water pump at the same time.
Depends on how it sounds or looks or whether it leaks or something. This is
in contrast to the received wisdom in this newgoup of course, but I listened
to them. The WP went bad a couple of months later. :-(
pws - 28 Aug 2007 21:45 GMT
> $89 per hour. They had no chance to sell me the shock replacement, but they
> didn't know that. They *are* honest, as far as I can tell. Town North
> Mazda, Richardson, Texas.
Wow, $89.00 per hour for over 6 hours of labor on a job that will
probably take them 3 hours.
I can see why you passed on that one.
I wish someone would pay me $600.00+ to replace their shocks, though I
might feel an obligation to kiss them after screwing them that hard. :-)
Seriously, I can do a shock job in my driveway without a lift or power
tools in that amount of time or less, and I charged the last person
$150.00, though it probably would have been closer to $200.00 for most
people.
Shocks are simple, just tedious, especially without a lift.
I have done it 3 times now and had no problems other than forgetting
that little white plastic piece.......twice.
> They also told me a while back when I had my timing belt replaced that they
> don't necessarily recommend replacing the water pump at the same time.
> Depends on how it sounds or looks or whether it leaks or something. This is
> in contrast to the received wisdom in this newgoup of course, but I listened
> to them. The WP went bad a couple of months later. :-(
That happened to another person I know.
Because of that, I consider the water pump replacement to be mandatory
when I do the timing belt, except in my latest case where it snapped at
27,000 miles.
Pat
Lanny Chambers - 28 Aug 2007 21:50 GMT
> They also told me a while back when I had my timing belt replaced that they
> don't necessarily recommend replacing the water pump at the same time.
> Depends on how it sounds or looks or whether it leaks or something. This is
> in contrast to the received wisdom in this newgoup of course, but I listened
> to them. The WP went bad a couple of months later. :-(
They make a little off a new water pump added to a timing belt job. They
make a lot off what's basically a second timing belt job, which they
probably knew you'd be back for in a few months. You have a funny
concept of "honest."
Frank Berger - 28 Aug 2007 22:54 GMT
>> They also told me a while back when I had my timing belt replaced that
>> they
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> probably knew you'd be back for in a few months. You have a funny
> concept of "honest."
I see your point, but I don't think you have enough evidence to support
that. What motivation did they have to tell me I don't need shocks? Are
the hoping I'll wreck the car and buy a new one from them?
Chris D'Agnolo - 29 Aug 2007 00:54 GMT
>> They make a little off a new water pump added to a timing belt job. They
>> make a lot off what's basically a second timing belt job, which they
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>that the miata is one of many cars being maintained. Add to that kids and
>whoa, it's amazing what kind of decisions you can sometimes justify ;-)
Chris
99BBB (coming up on 1st t-belt change ......grrrrr)