Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Mazda / Mazda Miata / August 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Car Prices

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
nico - 31 Aug 2007 16:22 GMT
Cars are a big investment. Since buying a car is relatively a long-
term investment, many people want to make an informed decision about
the latest prices of all models of cars before deciding on any one.
Car prices are likely to change quite often, depending on the market
conditions, introduction of newer models, competition, demand, and
many other factors. It is thus important to know the most up-to-date
prices of cars.
Read for full in:
Car Weekly News
http://www.zone-car.com/?car-prices.php
Grant Edwards - 31 Aug 2007 17:04 GMT
> Cars are a big investment. Since buying a car is relatively a long-
> term investment,

<peeve>

No they're not.  Cars are expenses.  They are not investments
unless you're one of _very_ few people buying classic cars in
anticipation of their appreciation.

You'd have to be dumb as a stump to think of normal cars as an
investments.  Something who's value drops by 25% as soon as you
take possession and then continues to drop steadily to $0 over
the next 15-20 years could only be considered an investment by
the severly delusional.

Stocks and bonds are investments.  Sometimes real estate is an
invenstment.  Tuition can be an investment.  Cars are just
expenses.

</peeve>

Signature

Grant Edwards                   grante             Yow! Where's the Coke
                                 at               machine?  Tell me a joke!!
                              visi.com

Frank Berger - 31 Aug 2007 17:16 GMT
>> Cars are a big investment. Since buying a car is relatively a long-
>> term investment,
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> invenstment.  Tuition can be an investment.  Cars are just
> expenses.

You're being overly harsh.  The word "investment" is most commonly used as
you say - involving a financial return.  But the poster's usage is not
incorrect (as looking it up it a dictionary will attest).  "Investment" can
refer to the purchase of an item that yields a flow of services over a
period of time (such as a car).  That is, a capital good.

Now, if you want to blast him for spamming, you'll get no argument from me.
Grant Edwards - 31 Aug 2007 17:28 GMT
> You're being overly harsh.

Probably. :)

> The word "investment" is most commonly used as you say -
> involving a financial return.  But the poster's usage is not
> incorrect (as looking it up it a dictionary will attest).
> "Investment" can refer to the purchase of an item that yields
> a flow of services over a period of time (such as a car).
> That is, a capital good.

Good point.  It's probably the expectation of future returns of
something valued that makes it an investment -- even if those
returns are financial.

Signature

Grant Edwards                   grante             Yow! ... bleakness
                                 at               ... desolation ... plastic
                              visi.com            forks ...

miker - 31 Aug 2007 19:44 GMT
> Good point.  It's probably the expectation of future returns of
> something valued that makes it an investment -- even if those
> returns are financial.

Same expectation applies to gambles. Like *stocks and bonds, in todays
envinronment. I wouldn't call them investments. In fact, I wouldn't call
many things investments today, except perhaps education expense or business
startup costs.

miker

*On a real basis stocks are lower now than in 2003. And bonds pay less than
inflation, making their loss guaranteed.
Grant Edwards - 31 Aug 2007 20:12 GMT
>> Good point.  It's probably the expectation of future returns of
>> something valued that makes it an investment -- even if those
>> returns are financial.
>
> Same expectation applies to gambles. Like *stocks and bonds,
> in todays envinronment. I wouldn't call them investments.

Perhaps they're not good investments, but it seems to me it's
the intent that counts.  I don't gamble as an investment, but I
do sometimes do it for entertainment.  There may be people who
do view gambling as an investment, but to do so they'd have to
beleive that they've figured out a way to beat house. Yes, I've
met people who sincerely beleived they had a
craps/blackjack/roullette system that would allow them to win
in the long run.

> In fact, I wouldn't call many things investments today, except
> perhaps education expense or business startup costs.

I think the term "investment" speaks more to the intent of the
acquisition rather than the actual performance.

> On a real basis stocks are lower now than in 2003. And bonds
> pay less than inflation, making their loss guaranteed.

That only makes their loss guaranteed if nothing ever changes
and performance from 2003 to present is going to continue
indefinitely.  That's not how markets work.

Signature

Grant Edwards                   grante             Yow! I hope something GOOD
                                 at               came in the mail today so
                              visi.com            I have a REASON to live!!

miker - 31 Aug 2007 21:18 GMT
> That only makes their loss guaranteed if nothing ever changes
> and performance from 2003 to present is going to continue
> indefinitely.  That's not how markets work.

A rising rate envinronment lowers bond returns with capital and opportunity
losses. Lowering rates hurts the dollar and gives you a purchasing power
loss. So whatcher saying is, we can reasonably expect politicians to quite
overspending and the Fed to quit overprinting? That's what it would take to
turn bonds around. I'm not sure governments work that way.

miker
Frank Berger - 31 Aug 2007 21:34 GMT
>> Good point.  It's probably the expectation of future returns of
>> something valued that makes it an investment -- even if those
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> than
> inflation, making their loss guaranteed.

Where does it say that an "investment" has to have a positive return for it
to be properly called an "investment?"
No "investment" involves certainty, therefore all investments are gambles.
miker - 31 Aug 2007 21:44 GMT
Ok, now I believe you're an economist. :)

miker

> Where does it say that an "investment" has to have a positive return for it
> to be properly called an "investment?"
Frank Berger - 31 Aug 2007 21:31 GMT
>> You're being overly harsh.
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Good point.

Hey, I'm not an economist for nothing.

(Just practically nothing)
XS11E - 31 Aug 2007 21:40 GMT

> Hey, I'm not an economist for nothing.
>
> (Just practically nothing)

Well, they tried to pay you what you're worth but there's that pesky
minimum wage law... <GD&R>

Signature

XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.