Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Mercedes-Benz Cars / January 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Miles per gallon

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
jimcollins123 - 12 Jan 2007 15:29 GMT
I have a W126 1987 300SE 66,000 miles. which is a delight and replaced
my 1981 107 380SL.
I realise that it is a heavy beast but wonder what other owners are
achieving on a short and long journey. Also interested to hear views as
to where this model sits in the pecking order of must have MBs.
Many thanks
Jim
Kurt - 12 Jan 2007 19:14 GMT
> I have a W126 1987 300SE 66,000 miles. which is a delight and
> replaced my 1981 107 380SL.
> I realise that it is a heavy beast but wonder what other owners
> are achieving on a short and long journey. Also interested to hear
> views as to where this model sits in the pecking order of must
> have MBs.

Don't know aboug the "pecking order". However, my heavier beast (87
300SDL) averages right at 26.5 mpg in mixed hiway/city driving. GVA is
around 4800 pounds.

Signature

Cheers,
Kurt

Richard Sexton - 12 Jan 2007 19:20 GMT
>> I have a W126 1987 300SE 66,000 miles. which is a delight and
>> replaced my 1981 107 380SL.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>300SDL) averages right at 26.5 mpg in mixed hiway/city driving. GVA is
>around 4800 pounds.

I get 25-33 in my 83 300SD.

*IMO* the 126 was the best ever MB. I'd kinda like to stick with this chassis
for a while. At least as a practical car. I like the 111 coupe second best.

Signature

  Need Mercedes parts?   http://parts.mbz.org
Richard Sexton       | Mercedes stuff: http://mbz.org
1970 280SE, 72 280SE | Home pages: http://rs79.vrx.net
633CSi 250SE/C 300SD | http://aquaria.net http://killi.net

Tiger - 12 Jan 2007 22:53 GMT
According to fueleconomy.gov... you should be getting 17 city and 19
highway. based on 1988 300SE.
jimcollins123 - 12 Jan 2007 23:35 GMT
> According to fueleconomy.gov... you should be getting 17 city and 19
> highway. based on 1988 300SE.

Thank you everyone, I am getting low 20's on mixed jorneys with as
light a right foot as I can manage.
I guess the diesel cars give better mileage than petrol. Maybe next
time.
Jim
jimcollins123 - 12 Jan 2007 23:36 GMT
> According to fueleconomy.gov... you should be getting 17 city and 19
> highway. based on 1988 300SE.

Thank you everyone, I am getting low 20's on mixed journeys with as
light a right foot as I can manage.
I guess the diesel cars give better mileage than petrol. Maybe next
time.
Jim
Tiger - 13 Jan 2007 05:40 GMT
Sounds like you are in UK... Imperial Gallon is more than US gallon so it
sounds like you are on the target of normal fuel mileage.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.