Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Mercedes-Benz Cars / February 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

What has happened to Mercedes reliability?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
iwhtcimtlfmwmaomopw@yahoo.com - 19 Feb 2007 09:14 GMT
They used to be like Toyota and Honda.
Gordon Hudson - 19 Feb 2007 09:44 GMT
> They used to be like Toyota and Honda.

I see reports of this too, but I have three recent MB cars (the oldest is
December 2004) and there have been no problems with any of them apart from
the C Class which had a damaged supercharger (damaged in the factory during
fitting) that had to be replaced under warranty.

I know that the surveys that are done in the UK tend to rely on people
reporting faults and I suspect that MB owners expect more and are likley to
be more disappointed when a fault occurs and therefore more likely to give a
bad review.
I know that MB in the UK looked into the problems and found that a lot of
the disatisfaction was dea;er related with the big groups for whom MB was
just one franchise of many not giving as good customer service as the
smaller specialist dealers.
I think I have been lucky in this regard because although the dealer I use
is quite large and has a lot of branches they only sell luxury brands and
they do have quite high standards of customer care.

My A Class has done a high mileage and not been well looked after but it has
never had any faults. The SLK has been trouble free too.
I like the C Class a lot but the boot is too small so I am swapping it for
an E Class. Having so many cars means that none of them do a high mileage
and I never keep them long enough to need tyres or exhausts.
Dori A Schmetterling - 20 Feb 2007 17:10 GMT
My 2001 CLK Cab (25K miles) has not, so far, given me any serious trouble
and has never refused to start.

DAS
Signature

For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
---

>> They used to be like Toyota and Honda.
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> an E Class. Having so many cars means that none of them do a high mileage
> and I never keep them long enough to need tyres or exhausts.
Red Fox - 28 Feb 2007 04:15 GMT
I have a 1983 240 Diesel that has about 90,000 miles on the odometer. The
only serious problem I have had with it was the water-polluted diesel fuel
sold in the US.  I ordered that car from MBZ before it was built and I
specified everything simple and mechanical - manual windows, manual
sun-roof, etc. The simpler the car is and the less gimmicky, the more
reliable it will be.

According to Consumer Reports many MBZs are now below average in
reliability.  I have heard comments that it mostly related to the untested
"gimmicks" that they are building into them.

> My 2001 CLK Cab (25K miles) has not, so far, given me any serious trouble
> and has never refused to start.
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> > an E Class. Having so many cars means that none of them do a high mileage
> > and I never keep them long enough to need tyres or exhausts.

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.