Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Mercedes-Benz Cars / June 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

no handbrake driving technique?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
nospammer999@hotmail.com - 28 Apr 2007 17:31 GMT
Hi - just started driving a 5-speed manual c-class... with the foot
"parking brake" (ie no handbrake)
I have to drive a long (>1 mile) uphill section which in rush hour is
stop start every few yards on the uphill section...
My other cars have had a handbrake ... so I can hold the car on the
handbrake... while I get the clutch to biting point, increase the gas,
and move off ... without rolling backwards, or stalling...

Now with the merc .... I'm really struggling ...
putting on the parking brake ... every few yards to hold the car is a
really slow/ clumsy operation....
but without it I risk stalling / rolling back ?

I've tried keeping it in first with clutch down / right foot on the
brake pedal then, when ready to move... get to biting poiint... then
quickly move right foot onto acceleartor before it stalls ... sometime
I stall ... sometime I roll back...

Surely mecedes wouldn't supply a manual transmission, with only a foot
parking brake unless there was a safe way to drive uphill in heavy
traffic ...

What's the correct technique?
thanks AJ
Anonymous - 28 Apr 2007 18:32 GMT
> Hi - just started driving a 5-speed manual c-class... with the foot
> "parking brake" (ie no handbrake)
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> What's the correct technique?
> thanks AJ

Perhaps they want you to change to a modern MB, with autobox and roll-back
auto braking :-)

Don't know what would be the correct way to drive your car but when I had a
similar one, I think I did what you did, or then applied a bit gas and
released the clutch pedal till it engages sufficiently to keep the car in
place, or even enough to make it move forward, and then just release the
"hand" brake. I'm sure you will learn each option, and apply each one
according to the steepness of the road.
Tiger - 28 Apr 2007 18:44 GMT
If you hare been driving long enough, you would never need handbrake to keep
car in position. I understand your situation where hill may be steep and you
are worried. I am too.

To overcome this from stand still, you have to learn to slightly partially
engage the clutch. What I meant by this is... do this on flat surface road
to experiment...  Let out the clutch slightly until car can engage and hold
it in position... now with accelerator, you can revs alot while car is
barely moving.

That position is what you need to learn how to use. It may seem like it is a
bad thing to do... it can be but as long you are not going like 3000 rpm to
crawl, you won't have problem.

This above technique is to learn how to crawl and release....when you are
ready to drive, then you engage fully.
Anonymous - 29 Apr 2007 17:01 GMT
> If you hare been driving long enough, you would never need handbrake to
> keep car in position. I understand your situation where hill may be steep
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> This above technique is to learn how to crawl and release....when you are
> ready to drive, then you engage fully.
I consider this the normal case with a manual tranny on a light uphil. On a
steep uphil road the engine would not hold the car on idle, I thought this
was the problem OP had.
Nihil - 05 Jun 2007 13:34 GMT
>> If you hare been driving long enough, you would never need handbrake
>> to keep car in position. I understand your situation where hill may be
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> On a steep uphil road the engine would not hold the car on idle, I
> thought this was the problem OP had.
What is life expectancy of clutch for using it this way? Heel and toe is
only sensible technique. Stupid design!
Anonymous - 05 Jun 2007 16:24 GMT
>>> This above technique is to learn how to crawl and release....when you
>>> are ready to drive, then you engage fully.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> What is life expectancy of clutch for using it this way? Heel and toe is
> only sensible technique. Stupid design!
I don't think you followed the thread from start, it was not about holding
the car with the clutch for a long time but starting from the handbrake
enganged first. If you do it properly and quickly enough, the clutch won't
heat up. What else could you do with a manual tranny?
Guenter Scholz - 29 Apr 2007 02:22 GMT
>Hi - just started driving a 5-speed manual c-class... with the foot
>"parking brake" (ie no handbrake)
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>What's the correct technique?
>thanks AJ

    easy, use your heel and toe.... toe on brake and heel on gas.
Easy as pie with a bit of practice.                                

cheers, guenter
David J - 30 Apr 2007 10:57 GMT
>>Hi - just started driving a 5-speed manual c-class... with the foot
>>"parking brake" (ie no handbrake)
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>    easy, use your heel and toe.... toe on brake and heel on gas.
>Easy as pie with a bit of practice.                                

It's not as easy as you suggest guenter....   :)

I consider that this foot/handbrake is a design disaster by MB - and I
drive a CLK auto. What possible advantage does is have over the
traditional design, unless someone is partially disabled?

I nearly had a misfortune when my car was new, and I tried to shove
the car (in neutral) a few feet on a slope when outside the car with
the engine off.  I went to grab the brake to hold it - and it wasn't
there!

Creeping the car uphill as you are currently doing is going to burn
out your clutch in no time.  You will just have to allow a gap to
occur and then move into it. Sad, but true.

David
Dori A Schmetterling - 01 May 2007 12:03 GMT
I agree about the potential clutch burn (although these hill starts are/were
part of the UK driving test).

I have been driving Mercs for 25 years and I really like the floor-operated
parking brake, though I don't recall when how it was when I had a manual
(200E).

My current (auto) 1993 190E has a 'hand' brake because the footwell is too
small for one on the floor.  It's ok but I prefer the floor job on my other
car (also a CLK, albeit the Cab version).

Yer pays yer money and takes yer choice.

DAS

For direct replies replace nospam with schmetterling
---
[...]

> It's not as easy as you suggest guenter....   :)
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> David
Guenter Scholz - 01 May 2007 18:18 GMT
>[...]
>
>> It's not as easy as you suggest guenter....   :)

...... of course it is. Albeit, you will need to practice a bit.  It didn't
take me too long until I could start on a 'steep' hill without rolling back
more than a couple inches.... OK, 10 cm but no more.  You will, as others
have pointed out, need to be fairly quick about it so as not to burn the
clutch excessively.... but, yes, it is definitely not that hard once you get
the hang of it.  Remember the first time you tried a clutch?  seemed hard
didn't it.

cheers, guenter

>> drive a CLK auto. What possible advantage does is have over the
>> traditional design, unless someone is partially disabled?
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>>
>> David
Me - 02 May 2007 06:21 GMT
> ...... of course it is. Albeit, you will need to practice a bit.  It
> didn't
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> cheers, guenter

The auto-box was had to me when I first tried it, a bit uncomfortable ride
when slowing and attempting to use clucth...
Times have changed, manual box might now give more jerky  ride :-)
Josh S - 06 Jun 2007 05:07 GMT
> >Surely mecedes wouldn't supply a manual transmission, with only a foot
> >parking brake unless there was a safe way to drive uphill in heavy
> >traffic ...

It sounds like they did provide it and I can assure it's a dumb design.
Probably because most get an auto transmission, where the step on
parking brake is passable, although I always prefer the hand brake in
the middle.
My Chrysler Concord has the step on hand brake, perhaps Mercedes get
that component from Chrysler. >:)

I've driven a manual more years than an auto, a step on hand brake I
wouldn't buy with a manual transmission.
Dori A Schmetterling - 08 Jun 2007 11:20 GMT
Mrec has had a foot-operated parking brake for donkeys' years (decades).

First exception was 190, too narrow.

DAS

For direct replies replace nospam with schmetterling
---

>> >Surely mecedes wouldn't supply a manual transmission, with only a foot
>> >parking brake unless there was a safe way to drive uphill in heavy
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> I've driven a manual more years than an auto, a step on hand brake I
> wouldn't buy with a manual transmission.
weelliott@gmail.com - 11 Jun 2007 15:04 GMT
I can't believe everyone is attacking merecedes for a 'stupid design'
or acting like it is impossible to drive a manual without a handbrake.
It's as thoguh they left off the steering wheel. If you actually know
how to manipulate a clutch, then you should be able to start with two
feet and no hands on the steepest of hills. It takes a little
practice, but the person who taught you how to drive stick should have
taught you. It is part of learning to drive stick in my opinion. My
father taught me how to do it. I have included it in my teaching
everyone I have taught. If you only learned how to start on level
terrain and shift gears, then you should feel cheated. I wonder if
they bothered to teach you how to shift smoothly with matched revs. I
too was initially taught the handbrake method as a back up to just
being able to work three pedals with two feet method. But it was made
clear that it is like training wheels, only to be used if you are just
too nervous to do it the right way. It was to be used until I had
mastered the right way.

I know that not every one here is a skilled driver, or even aspires to
be. And I'm not trying to attack people for it. But why attack a car
company for creating a car without training wheels? Simply learn how
to drive it the right way and you won't need the hand brake.
Alternatively, if you like the manual, but can't handle hills, go buy
a subaru with the hill holder feature-and a handbrake.
Guenter Scholz - 11 Jun 2007 15:16 GMT
>I can't believe everyone is attacking merecedes for a 'stupid design'
>or acting like it is impossible to drive a manual without a handbrake.
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>Alternatively, if you like the manual, but can't handle hills, go buy
>a subaru with the hill holder feature-and a handbrake.

    couldn't agree with you more and said so myself on the first go
around of this thread.... but then I realized that most of the people here
are not 'really' into 'driving'.... let's face it, MB is a bit of a taxi cab
and unabashedly caters to those who probably never used a clutch period.

cheers, guenter
mcbrue - 12 Jun 2007 00:13 GMT
Clutch? Do they still make clutches for cars? Hmmmm .... strange.
Wonder what they do - dont the clutches get in the way of the trannies
that shift the gears and stuff and make the car burn less gas as it
goes faster. At least Ole Heavy Karl explained to me that the little
letters other than D and R mean that you burn more gas, so just stay
in D for going forward, and R for reverse. Never have been able to
figure out those dumb Germans - why didn't they make if F for
foreward????

mcbrue under the bridge in the trailer down by the river
Tiger - 12 Jun 2007 17:34 GMT
LOL... McBrue WITHOUT A MERCEDES under the bridge in the trailer down by the
river

So ya miss tha' Mercedes and Heavy Carl? It must be so lonely with that
Lexus now... I can almost imgine..."Break damn it... break! I want to go see
Hakumoto san..."
who - 04 May 2007 08:51 GMT
> I've tried keeping it in first with clutch down / right foot on the
> brake pedal then, when ready to move... get to biting poiint... then
> quickly move right foot onto acceleartor before it stalls ... sometime
> I stall ... sometime I roll back...

That sounds like what I used to do and I learned not to stall.
I'm sure you would be a lot happier with an auto trans.
Guenter Scholz - 04 May 2007 14:41 GMT
>> I've tried keeping it in first with clutch down / right foot on the
>> brake pedal then, when ready to move... get to biting poiint... then
>> quickly move right foot onto acceleartor before it stalls ... sometime
>> I stall ... sometime I roll back...

    ... hang in there.  It get's better with practice.  Again, try to
control both brake and gas with your right foot's toes and heel respectively.
Kind of pivot betweent the two.  After you've mastered being able to  'rock'
the car back and forth on a hill you can practice driving your standard
transmission car without using your clutch.  that does take a bit more skill
still.  I'm not kidding either.  As a young lad (and poor) I drove my father
in law's type 3 Karman Ghia well over a couple hundred km including city
driving and a ferry by doing just that.  Admittedly I was a bit sweaty after
that.... but I had to have that Ghia.

cheers, guenter
roland franzius - 04 May 2007 18:18 GMT
>>>I've tried keeping it in first with clutch down / right foot on the
>>>brake pedal then, when ready to move... get to biting poiint... then
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> driving and a ferry by doing just that.  Admittedly I was a bit sweaty after
> that.... but I had to have that Ghia.

Sorry, Guenter, but you should not encourage normal drivers to use this
technique. Even a good driver is in danger to get the wrong pedal in 1
of 100 times. Too expensive for stop and go.

Signature

Roland Franzius

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.