Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Mercedes-Benz Cars / July 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

M180 with a single row timing chain, why double row?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Martijn Tonies - 10 Jul 2007 13:00 GMT
Hi,

I've just gotten myself a M180 engine but it has a single row timing chain,
while another M180 I have has a double row chain.

Does anyone know why Mercedes used a single row chain and why a
double one?

Can I replace the single by a double if I change the sprocket wheels as
well?

--
Martijn
-->> T.G. Lambach <<-- - 10 Jul 2007 17:11 GMT
A double row chain is stronger than a single chain and therefore less
likely to break. The 3.8L V-8s of the early '80s had single chains but
these motors had the space so double chains could be retrofitted - and
usually were. I cite that old V-8 because I don't know what a M-180 is.
Signature

© 2007 T.G.Lambach. Publication in any form requires prior written
permission.

Martijn Tonies - 10 Jul 2007 21:33 GMT
> A double row chain is stronger than a single chain and therefore less
> likely to break. The 3.8L V-8s of the early '80s had single chains but
> these motors had the space so double chains could be retrofitted - and
> usually were. I cite that old V-8 because I don't know what a M-180 is.

The M180 is a 6 cylinder inline engine, around 1970, for example in the
W114 and so on.

But, would it break easily? Under what conditions? Should I replace it by
a double chain?

--
Martijn
-->> T.G. Lambach <<-- - 11 Jul 2007 00:18 GMT
Most owners don't want their pistons smashing into their valves when the
chain breaks.

Why do you think new motors have double chains when a single chain will do?
Signature

© 2007 T.G.Lambach. Publication in any form requires prior written
permission.

Roland Franzius - 11 Jul 2007 11:19 GMT
-->> T.G. Lambach <<-- schrieb:
> Most owners don't want their pistons smashing into their valves when the
> chain breaks.
>
> Why do you think new motors have double chains when a single chain will do?

The 230.6 1968 had a single chain. I bought it with 160000 km and the
first hard ride on the autobahn broke the chain at 175 km/h. The reason
was the tensioner, someone had blocked it with high tension to have a
smooth motor noise like a sewing machine.

Since valves were straight upright in this inline 6 with one camshaft
only and valve levers were made of forged steal it was enough to replace
the deformed lever the valve in one cylinder and the chain. That lever
and valve are still a scuplture on my desk.

That hit on the crankshaft bearing of that piston then cracked the motor
sometime later.

The engines with double camshafts had inclined valves and a broken chain
meant to make crap of the motor. They got a double chain and the MB
service recommended to replace it before 200000 km to avoid even rare
events of desaster.

Signature

Roland Franzius

Richard Sexton - 13 Jul 2007 10:34 GMT
Only 8 postwar models used a single row chain:

    http://articles.mbz.org/engine/gas/chains/?

They were not particularly wonderful. If you can afford to upgrade
to double row by all means do so - if the rest of the car is worth keeping.

Signature

  Need Mercedes parts?   http://parts.mbz.org
Richard Sexton       | Mercedes stuff: http://mbz.org
1970 280SE, 72 280SE | Home pages: http://rs79.vrx.net
633CSi 250SE/C 300SD | http://aquaria.net http://killi.net

Martijn Tonies - 16 Jul 2007 15:20 GMT
> Only 8 postwar models used a single row chain:
>
> http://articles.mbz.org/engine/gas/chains/?
>
> They were not particularly wonderful. If you can afford to upgrade
> to double row by all means do so - if the rest of the car is worth keeping.

I only have the engine, but I do have plenty of spare parts from
other M180 engines (M180.928).

Would I be able to use those parts to replace the chain.

In this particular setup, I will not go 175 Km/h, only about 90 max,
but I will use it in a heavier vehicle.

--
Martijn
Richard Sexton - 17 Jul 2007 04:36 GMT
>> Only 8 postwar models used a single row chain:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>Would I be able to use those parts to replace the chain.

I don't know for sure. If you have a dealershi p with a decnet parts
guy he can probably give you he list of parts and from that you should
be able to figrue out what ones you already have.

Signature

  Need Mercedes parts?   http://parts.mbz.org
Richard Sexton       | Mercedes stuff: http://mbz.org
1970 280SE, 72 280SE | Home pages: http://rs79.vrx.net
633CSi 250SE/C 300SD | http://aquaria.net http://killi.net

Martijn Tonies - 17 Jul 2007 08:45 GMT
> >> Only 8 postwar models used a single row chain:
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> guy he can probably give you he list of parts and from that you should
> be able to figrue out what ones you already have.

Well some parts are the same (eg: intermediate shaft from oilpump etc),
but others seem to have slightly different numbers but have been replaced
by ones that look alike. I think that the bushings are the same but haven't
put them next to one another yet.

Might give it a go, there seems to be space enough for it.

--
Martijn
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.