> I got about a 10% increase in both the 4 and 5cyl diesels. The
> performance increase from new fuel filters and an injector cleaner
> continued to the increase and made a big difference in the 240D's
> power.
Anyone run long enough to see if mileage has improved and stays that way
when no MMO is in the fuel? How about is the improved mileage cancelled out
by the cost of MMO? How about comparisons to using ATF?
I just purchased an old Bosch injector tester/cleaner on Ebay, so i need to
order some heat shields before i use it.

Signature
Stupendous Man,
Defender of Freedom, Advocate of Liberty
jch - 22 Sep 2007 19:20 GMT
>> I got about a 10% increase in both the 4 and 5cyl diesels. The
>> performance increase from new fuel filters and an injector cleaner
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> I just purchased an old Bosch injector tester/cleaner on Ebay, so i need to
> order some heat shields before i use it.
_____
My Mercedes specialist recommends that one adds about one cup of ATF per
tank. The reason has nothing to do with improving fuel economy, but
with increasing the lower lubricity of current low sulphur diesel fuels.
Apparently the injection pumps on the older diesel engines (1980s) are
not as sensitive to lower lubricity. The newer injection pumps (moving
vanes ?) may show a higher failure rate.

Signature
Regards / JCH
DougS - 27 Sep 2007 20:39 GMT
> > I got about a 10% increase in both the 4 and 5cyl diesels. The
> > performance increase from new fuel filters and an injector cleaner
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Stupendous Man,
> Defender of Freedom, Advocate of Liberty
I am going to look at the cost difference/savings on my next fill-up.
I have purchased two bottles of MMO so far. I get them for $3.44
(32oz) at the local store. The first bottle I used as an initial
treatment and put 8oz in the tank at fill-up, plus 8oz in the
crankcase. This bottle I'm using per directions.
So, if I use 4-6 oz per tank I should get about 3-4 tanks out of a
bottle. That comes to about a $1 per tank. I usually fill up just
above empty which takes about 12-13 gallons and diesel is running a
little over $2.85 here now (actually higher this week).
So, doing the math, it doesn't take much improvement for it to pay for
itself. Just a 10% increase (2-3 mpg increase) can save a gallon in
one tank. Of course, my problem is that I never seem to fill the tank
up the same amount each time, so my mileage isn't as accurate as it
could be. The auto-shutoff on the pump always fills my tank too full
and it spills out, does anyone else have this problem?
The biggest difference I notice is the pep in the engine, already it
feels much more responsive, especially when its cold. I've only run
two tanks of MMO through mine so far though, so I still have so
testing to do.
One additional note, does it matter about the note on the back stating
that it doesn't meet the low sulfur requirements? That only applies to
the newer diesels, right?
JackG - 28 Sep 2007 16:09 GMT
> > > I got about a 10% increase in both the 4 and 5cyl diesels. The
> > > performance increase from new fuel filters and an injector cleaner
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> that it doesn't meet the low sulfur requirements? That only applies to
> the newer diesels, right?
I haven't calculated mileage changes that may have occurred but I too
have noticed an improvement in how the engine (1984 SD) runs. It seems
smoother and more responsive and I seem to see less smoking. I've
started using it in my '84 Ford diesel pick up as well and there seems
to be a noticeable improvement there as well. I'd read about this but
never really tried it. Thanks for pushing the idea, Tiger
Jack
Tiger - 28 Sep 2007 22:40 GMT
You are welcome Jack... Report back to us with any information.
RF - 04 Oct 2007 06:20 GMT
>>>> I got about a 10% increase in both the 4 and 5cyl diesels. The
>>>> performance increase from new fuel filters and an injector cleaner
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
>
> Jack
I had my '84 240D in Europe last year and it had to be tested for
registration. A device was attached to the exhaust which had lots of
smoke. The guy doing the testing revved the engine so hard that I
thought it would blow up. Finally, after 3-4 minutes he relaxed the
accelerator and the exhaust was quite clean. The "smoke" was lots of
carbon particles that had built up and this was making the exhaust look
dirty.
Has this Marvel oil being tested by an independent lab that has a good
reputation?
RF
Tiger - 04 Oct 2007 16:04 GMT
No... no test... Marvel Mystery oil was developed I think in the 60's by a
GM engineer who later left to open his own company. It is a thin oil.
RF - 05 Oct 2007 05:19 GMT
> No... no test... Marvel Mystery oil was developed I think in the 60's by a
> GM engineer who later left to open his own company. It is a thin oil.
Thanks Tiger.
I find this really astounding. If it's as good as this thread believes,
why was it not tested by a test company with impeccable credentials way
back? This would have put out the good news 40 years ago and the guy
would have made a fortune on it by now.
A similar product is being advertized on Quake radio (www.quake.com),
with claims for greatly reduced emissions and higher mileage. Ed Schultz
(Radio Guru) is one of the people pushing it. I asked the company that
sells it about testing and here is what I received:
"Thank you for your inquiry on CA 40g fuel additive. I forwarded your
question to the manufacturer and they supplied me with a test performed
by Northern California Diagnostics Laboratories, Inc. It is now on our
website. http://www.hydro-zoneinc.com/ca406.htm"
I would like to believe these claims but I need something really solid
before I spend any money on it.
I'm looking forward to your opinion.
RF
me - 05 Oct 2007 14:48 GMT
>> No... no test... Marvel Mystery oil was developed I think in the
>> 60's by a GM engineer who later left to open his own company. It is
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> I'm looking forward to your opinion.
When I had diesels (years ago) I used to run a bottle of techron
through them about every 4-5 tankfulls or about every oil change. It
seemed to keep the fuel system clean and increase pep, however I never
saw it as a cost savings.
Today I still run a bottle of techron through the cars (gasoline)
about once a year or every FSS oil change.
As far as Mercedes recommendations go, I believe they eschew
additives.