Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Mercedes-Benz Cars / February 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Tire Opinions W123 300D

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
randallbrink@mac.com - 13 Feb 2008 22:41 GMT
I've seen other posts on tires here, but wanted to solicit opinions on
a comparison between Michelin, Perelli (P3000) and Bridgestone. These
are 195/70/14s.

I'm looking for a smooth, quiet ride, more than "performance" in the
sense of how the tire handles under hard maneuvering.

Thanks in advance.
trader4@optonline.net - 14 Feb 2008 00:38 GMT
On Feb 13, 5:41 pm, "randallbr...@mac.com" <randallbr...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I've seen other posts on tires here, but wanted to solicit opinions on
> a comparison between Michelin, Perelli (P3000) and Bridgestone. These
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Thanks in advance.

I've had Pirelli P3000 & CN36, and Mich MXV.  I currently have
Goodrich Traction T/A's and IMO they are by far the best tire I've
had.  With the Mich I could easily spin the rear wheels on wet
pavement from a dead start.   The Goodrich stick.   They are what I'd
call a sport/touring type of tire, with a very comfortable ride.
randallbrink@mac.com - 14 Feb 2008 01:08 GMT
On Feb 13, 4:38 pm, "trad...@optonline.net" <trad...@optonline.net>
wrote:
> On Feb 13, 5:41 pm, "randallbr...@mac.com" <randallbr...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> pavement from a dead start.   The Goodrich stick.   They are what I'd
> call a sport/touring type of tire, with a very comfortable ride.

This is very good to know, as I had not considered the Goodrich brand
before.

I do know, however, that the Michelin is about USD $110 per tire, and
the Pirelli about $120 per tire. I am currently using the Toyo tire,
which is a Japanese tire that I have had good luck with in the past--
about $80/tire. Money is not the critical factor, however.

Thanks very much for the info.
trader4@optonline.net - 14 Feb 2008 11:57 GMT
On Feb 13, 8:08 pm, "randallbr...@mac.com" <randallbr...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Feb 13, 4:38 pm, "trad...@optonline.net" <trad...@optonline.net>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

I think you'll find the Goodrich are closer in price to the Toyo than
the Michelin.
heav - 14 Feb 2008 14:24 GMT
I have 402,768 miles on my 1982 300 TDT.  I have run Bridgestone and
Michelin tires.  I have tried going up one width in size.  The car
handles and rides better with the 195 70R 14 tire, which is the stock
size.

I have Dunlop A2s on the car right now and I like that tire quite
well.  You can get them on-line for $64 plus shipping at the
TireRack.com

http://www.tirerack.com/tires/Compare1.jsp?loadRank=2&width=195%2F&ratio=70&diam
eter=14&autoYear=1982&diameter=14&sortCode=34600&minLoad=S&ratio=70&autoMake=Mer
cedes-Benz&autoModClar=&minSpeedRating=S&width=195%2F&autoModel=300TD&vehicleSea
rch=true&startIndex=0&search=true&pagelen=20&pagenum=1&pagemark=1&manufacturer=D
unlop&speed_rating=S&speed_rating=T&speed_rating=U&speed_rating=H&speed_rating=V
&speed_rating=Z&speed_rating=W&speed_rating=Y&speed_rating=%28Y%29&RunFlat=All&x
=38&y=6


They are H rated speed radials, which are recommended for my car.

I like Wal-Mart for mounting and balancing.  That will cost you an
additional $20 or so per tire for lifetime guaranteed balancing and
mounting.  (It might be a little less)

I have had terrible luck with CostCo tire places.  They have sold me
tires that were out of round, their tire guys have bent rims and
refused to admit it, they have twisted off lug bolts, and their
balancing is lousy.  I will never go back there again for tires,
period.

"
Dunlop SP Sport A2 Plus

"The SP Sport A2 Plus is the enhanced descendant of Dunlop's popular
D60 A2 High Performance All-Season radial. The SP Sport A2 Plus was
developed to deliver year round performance for the drivers of sport
cars, coupes and sedans. The SP Sport A2 Plus is designed to blend
long treadwear, responsive handling and dependable traction on dry and
wet roads, as well as in light snow.

"On the outside, the SP Sport A2 Plus molds a longer wearing tread
compound into a mildly asymmetric tread design that features outside
shoulder blocks with minimal siping to enhance steering response and
cornering stability while the inside shoulder blocks feature more
sipes to provide the additional biting edges to aid traction in foul
weather. The SP Sport A2 Plus radial's 3-rib center contact patch is
designed to enhance dry, wet and light snow traction during
acceleration, braking and cornering. The entire tread design features
Dunlop's "CHAOS" pitch sequencing of tread block shapes and sizes to
help reduce noise and increase acoustic comfort. On the inside, the SP
Sport A2 Plus features twin, high-density steel belts reinforced by
Dunlop's JointLess Band (JLB) nylon to enhance driving control and
provide long, even treadwear while minimizing weight and enhancing
ride quality. Additionally, hard rubber bead fillers and a high ply
turn-up enhance steering response and cornering stability."
randallbrink@mac.com - 14 Feb 2008 15:55 GMT
> I have 402,768 miles on my 1982 300 TDT.  I have run Bridgestone and
> Michelin tires.  I have tried going up one width in size.  The car
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
> ride quality. Additionally, hard rubber bead fillers and a high ply
> turn-up enhance steering response and cornering stability."

Very good information. Thank you!
Karl - 14 Feb 2008 19:30 GMT
Keep in mind that he has a TDT which is a 123.193 station wagon.
The stock wheels on it were 6J x 14, alloys w/MB part number 126 400 19 02
with an offset of 30.
Your 300D is a 123.130 and came with stock wheels that are 5 1/2J x 14,
alloys were part number 123 40017 02 and steel were part number 123 400 03
02; both have an offset of 30.
The stock original tire size was 175R14.

On Feb 14, 6:24 am, heav <p...@inyopro.com> wrote:
> I have 402,768 miles on my 1982 300 TDT. I have run Bridgestone and
> Michelin tires. I have tried going up one width in size. The car
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
> ride quality. Additionally, hard rubber bead fillers and a high ply
> turn-up enhance steering response and cornering stability."

Very good information. Thank you!
randallbrink@mac.com - 15 Feb 2008 16:00 GMT
> Keep in mind that he has a TDT which is a 123.193 station wagon.
> The stock wheels on it were 6J x 14, alloys w/MB part number 126 400 19 02
[quoted text clipped - 59 lines]
>
> Very good information. Thank you!

This interesting because the car had 205/70R/14s and I put on what the
manual said was the original tire--195/70/14. What would be the effect
of having the 175/70/14. Am I OK with the 195s?
Karl - 15 Feb 2008 18:07 GMT
Go here: http://www.miata.net/garage/tirecalc.html
Put 175 70 14 on the left side, 195 70 14 on the right.

195 65 14 would get you closer to 175 70 14

On Feb 14, 11:30 am, "Karl" <aufe...@prodigy.net> wrote:
> Keep in mind that he has a TDT which is a 123.193 station wagon.
> The stock wheels on it were 6J x 14, alloys w/MB part number 126 400 19 02
[quoted text clipped - 59 lines]
>
> Very good information. Thank you!

This interesting because the car had 205/70R/14s and I put on what the
manual said was the original tire--195/70/14. What would be the effect
of having the 175/70/14. Am I OK with the 195s?
randallbrink@mac.com - 15 Feb 2008 18:55 GMT
> Go here:http://www.miata.net/garage/tirecalc.html
> Put 175 70 14 on the left side, 195 70 14 on the right.
[quoted text clipped - 73 lines]
> manual said was the original tire--195/70/14. What would be the effect
> of having the 175/70/14. Am I OK with the 195s?

Well, the manual did say 195 for the '79. I must admit that I don't
know the net effect of the difference.
heav - 14 Feb 2008 14:33 GMT
Here is a link to a comparison chart at the Tire Rack.

http://www.tirerack.com/tires/surveyresults/surveydisplay.jsp?type=HPAS&width=19
5%2F&ratio=70&diameter=14&tireSearch=true&autoMake=Mercedes-Benz&autoYear=1982&a
utoModel=300TD&autoModClar=&minSpeedRating=S&speed_rating=S&speed_rating=T&speed
_rating=U&speed_rating=H&speed_rating=V&speed_rating=Z&speed_rating=W&speed_rati
ng=Y&speed_rating=(Y
)

If you study the table you will see that the Dunlop is quieter and
more comfortable than the Goodrich tire, but the Goodrich rates higher
overall and higher in traction categories.
Tiger - 14 Feb 2008 23:20 GMT
Heav is right... Tirerack is the best place for information on tires that
matches your tire size. If you do want to spend $110 to $120 per tire and
wants great snow traction, then go with Nokian WR All Weather tire.
randallbrink@mac.com - 15 Feb 2008 16:03 GMT
> Heav is right... Tirerack is the best place for information on tires that
> matches your tire size. If you do want to spend $110 to $120 per tire and
> wants great snow traction, then go with Nokian WR All Weather tire.

Money is no object, but sometimes I wonder where the value curve is on
tires. I generally believe in buying the best for this car or any, as
you get what you pay for. But I decided against the Perelli P4000 at
$120 per tire, figuring that, for my type of driving, the cost of a
"performance" tire would not be justified. At the same time, I decided
against Cooper, which I have used before, as just not a heavyweight
tire for this type of car.
Tiger - 15 Feb 2008 21:47 GMT
Best tire is subjective and it is easily determined at Tirerack.com. Best
does not mean $$$ either.  I bought General UHP high performance tire for 3
season use and the tire was cheap but the performance and ride comfort is
#1... even Tirerack people and customers said so.

I used to like Pirelli... no more. The name is famous but the performance is
not there. Only their most expensive tire may be worthy but I would choose
other brands before I decide on them. Same goes for Michelin, overpriced and
definitely lack in performance and traction. They may be long lasting tire
but buying their tires is like wearing dress shoe all the time regardless of
weather. I am talking about their all season tires.
randallbrink@mac.com - 16 Feb 2008 15:08 GMT
> Best tire is subjective and it is easily determined at Tirerack.com. Best
> does not mean $$$ either.  I bought General UHP high performance tire for 3
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> but buying their tires is like wearing dress shoe all the time regardless of
> weather. I am talking about their all season tires.

I agree on all counts. One reason I got away from buying the $100+
tires is that, while they have a very high mileage rating, I drive
relatively little, probably around 5,000 miles per year, and the tires
don't wear out, they just get old and brittle. I just replaced a set
that had nearly new tread, but were so hard that they were like riding
on wooden wheels.
weelliott@gmail.com - 20 Feb 2008 15:45 GMT
I've also had good luck with the Toyo tires. Both the Toyo and the
Yokohama Avids have worked well for me. Both are a little perofrmance
oriented, and maybe more so than you're looking for, but they don't
have the downsides of a performance tire. Like being noisy or harsh
riding. Both are fine in the snow too.
weelliott@gmail.com - 20 Feb 2008 15:48 GMT
I forgot to mention, I went up to the 205/60 or 205/65(they only offer
one of these.) It gives a little more tread width and about the same
sidewall height for a little better handling. I'm not trying to turn
my merc into a sports car, but rather to compensate for the mediocre
handling.
randallbrink@mac.com - 21 Feb 2008 01:07 GMT
> I forgot to mention, I went up to the 205/60 or 205/65(they only offer
> one of these.) It gives a little more tread width and about the same
> sidewall height for a little better handling. I'm not trying to turn
> my merc into a sports car, but rather to compensate for the mediocre
> handling.

Very good information for future consideration. I went with the
195/70/14 and the car is riding smooth and sure again.
heav - 21 Feb 2008 16:02 GMT
What brand of tire did you decide to purchase?

On Feb 20, 5:07 pm, "randallbr...@mac.com" <randallbr...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> > I forgot to mention, I went up to the 205/60 or 205/65(they only offer
> > one of these.) It gives a little more tread width and about the same
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Very good information for future consideration. I went with the
> 195/70/14 and the car is riding smooth and sure again.
randallbrink@mac.com - 23 Feb 2008 22:07 GMT
> What brand of tire did you decide to purchase?
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> > Very good information for future consideration. I went with the
> > 195/70/14 and the car is riding smooth and sure again.

I went with the Toyo, primarily becasue that was what was on it, and
because I have used Toyo before with good results.

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.