I just put a set of AMG staggered 17" wheels on my '92 300D. Some how it
just doesn't feel right and the outer edges of the front tires are wearing
fast almost as though it developed a lot of positive camber. should I
expect better?
JD
If by "staggered" you mean offset then I suspect the pivot point of the
old wheel & tire combination is not in the center of the new wheel &
tire tread.
A hypothetical line projected through the upper and lower ball joints
down to the ground marks the pivot point on the ground. To have it be in
the center of the tire's tread depends on a specified wheel offset,
wheel diameter and tire height etc. I suspect your new wheels make the
new tires pivot somewhere off the designed pivot point.
I'd first check the toe-in or toe-out as the case may be for that, if
incorrect, can wear the edge of a tire. Center the steering wheel and
roll the car to a stop using the parking brake. For a quick and dirty
check just sight down the outer edge of each front tire (at its mid
height) to its rear wheel. You may find that one, or both, don't achieve
this crude alignment check. If that's so have a professional adjust the
car's toe-in, or the whole front suspension.

Signature
© 2008 T.G.Lambach. Publication in any form requires prior written
permission.
JD - 12 Mar 2008 03:29 GMT
> If by "staggered" you mean offset then I suspect the pivot point of the
> old wheel & tire combination is not in the center of the new wheel &
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> this crude alignment check. If that's so have a professional adjust the
> car's toe-in, or the whole front suspension.
By "staggered" I mean 17" x 8 1/2" ET30 in the rear and 17" x 7 1/2" ET37
in the front. The stock ET is 49 on the 6 1/2" wheel. If I understand the
offset thing correctly, the difference in the ET corresponds to half the
difference in the width of the wheel and I *should* be OK.
JD
> I just put a set of AMG staggered 17" wheels on my '92 300D. Some how it
> just doesn't feel right and the outer edges of the front tires are wearing
> fast almost as though it developed a lot of positive camber. should I
> expect better?
Did you get it aligned?
-tom!
--
JD - 12 Mar 2008 16:11 GMT
>> I just put a set of AMG staggered 17" wheels on my '92 300D. Some how it
>> just doesn't feel right and the outer edges of the front tires are wearing
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> -tom!
That's on the agenda for tomorrow but as it was never an issue with the
stock wheels I'm unsure of why it becomes an issue with the 17's.
JD
Tom Plunket - 15 Mar 2008 22:08 GMT
> > Did you get it aligned?
>
> That's on the agenda for tomorrow but as it was never an issue with the
> stock wheels I'm unsure of why it becomes an issue with the 17's.
The wheels and tires are an integral part of the car's suspension.
Changing them changes the interactions that take place between the road
and the car's frame.
Glad the alignment helped. ;)
-tom!
--
You need to get it aligned at the shop with your new wheels.
JD schrieb:
> I just put a set of AMG staggered 17" wheels on my '92 300D. Some how it
> just doesn't feel right and the outer edges of the front tires are
> wearing fast almost as though it developed a lot of positive camber.
> should I expect better?
You should have a look on the list of allowed wheels for your car.
Probably you need a fender broadening and rims are produced with
different wheel offsets for different cars. As far as I see the W124
300D is not made for 17"
http://www.mercedes-benz.de/content/media_library/germany/mpc_germany/de/mercede
s-benz_deutschland/personenwagen/home/produkte/zubehoer/reifen_und_felgen/radrei
fen_kombinationen/e-klasse/e_class_124_saloon.object-Single-MEDIA.download.tmp/E
_Klasse_Limousine_Typ_124.pdf
According to the data sheet the 300D maximum is 16" with axle and fender
corrections.

Signature
Roland Franzius
Tiger - 12 Mar 2008 16:13 GMT
It doesn't matter what size wheel you got... as long as it is the proper
offset and total diameter. Meaning right wheel and right size tire.
European Union and GB has different set of rules on what is allowed on cars
for insurance purpose. Not in US.
JD - 12 Mar 2008 16:57 GMT
> It doesn't matter what size wheel you got... as long as it is the proper
> offset and total diameter. Meaning right wheel and right size tire.
>
> European Union and GB has different set of rules on what is allowed on cars
> for insurance purpose. Not in US.
My rolling diameters are good. My offsets should change by half the
increase in wheel width, correct? If so I'm in good shape.
Thanks
JD
Tiger - 12 Mar 2008 20:26 GMT
Your rear tire of 17" x 8.5" ET30 is too small. It should be at around ET35.
The front is fine... 17" x 7.5" ET37 is perfect.
Who sold you the wheels? New or used?
JD - 13 Mar 2008 01:15 GMT
I got the wheels used on Ebay. Are you sure about the ET30 being to small?
If it's a matter of keeping the tire centered, a 2" (50mm)increase in wheel
width should translate to 25mm decrease in offset, right?
JD
> Your rear tire of 17" x 8.5" ET30 is too small. It should be at around ET35.
> The front is fine... 17" x 7.5" ET37 is perfect.
>
> Who sold you the wheels? New or used?
Tiger - 13 Mar 2008 04:52 GMT
Go to tires.com and go look up the wheels for your car. Pay attention to the
width and the offset related to them.
You can also call up AMG and ask them directly.
JD - 13 Mar 2008 05:13 GMT
> Go to tires.com and go look up the wheels for your car. Pay attention to the
> width and the offset related to them.
>
> You can also call up AMG and ask them directly.
Thanks!
JD
JD - 14 Mar 2008 04:05 GMT
Just had it aligned today and the difference was dramatic; MUCH better. It
didn't pull before but was eating front tires. It didn't feel bad before
but is much more surefooted now. My indy MB guy also assured me that the 8
1/2" x 17" ET30 is correct for that width in the rear.
JD
>> Go to tires.com and go look up the wheels for your car. Pay attention
>> to the width and the offset related to them.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> JD
Tiger - 14 Mar 2008 05:32 GMT
That's good then... alignment should solve the problem.