Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Mercedes-Benz Cars / July 2009

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

1982 Mercedes 300 TDT Going Strong after 421,000 miles

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
heav - 18 Jul 2009 19:17 GMT
I recently drove my 1982 300 TDT over the Kern Plateau to the San
Joaquin Valley.  You climb 6000 ft to the top of the plateau on a
winding, steep, narrow road.  Then drive 50 miles at elevation across
the plateau to the rim of the canyon of the Kern River at 9200 ft.
Then drop down and incredibly long series of hairpin turns and steep
slopes, requiring low range almost the entire way to 3,500 ft.  Then
the road climbs up the far side of the canyon another 5,000 feet or so
and then drops nearly 7,000 feet, again on a very winding, low gear
road to the San Joaquin valley, then the road winds through the scrub
oak ranches for 30 miles and then climbs back up another 7,000 ft with
another hundred switchbacks or so to the elevation of the Giant
Sequoias of Sequoia National Park.  I had the AC on when necessary and
the car was comfortable the entire way despite the humid, 90+ degree
temperatures at the lower elevations.  I stayed overnight, did some
photography work, and then returned back via the same route the next
day.  When I got home I checked the oil and the 3 liter, 5 cylinder
diesel had consumed about a cup of oil in the 500 miles of grueling
driving.  The transmission was really put through its paces and didn't
use any oil.  It also does not leak.  The only oil leak on the engine
is a little bit from the valve cover because I didn't replace the
gasket the last time I adjusted the valves.

I bought the car when it was ten years old and had 144,000 miles on
it.  The original owner had just put in the third transmission in the
car and decided to get rid of it because it went through
transmissions.  I have faithfully changed the oil and filter in the
tranny every 15,000 miles when I was running dinosaur fluid and now
that I am running Mobile 1 synthetic I change it every 30,000 and this
third transmission still works like new.

So I would say that the 1982 300 series cars were very well built.
And ride and drive like a dream.  I have driven the same route with my
4Runner and I am exhausted after just one way, let along driving back
the next day.  When I drove the Benz I was not even tired when I got
home, and the car got over 30 mpg despite the incredible climbs and
descents.
randallbrink - 20 Jul 2009 02:26 GMT
> I recently drove my 1982 300 TDT over the Kern Plateau to the San
> Joaquin Valley.  You climb 6000 ft to the top of the plateau on a
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
> home, and the car got over 30 mpg despite the incredible climbs and
> descents.

It is all because you own and operate one of the finest examples of
superior automotive engineering ever built.

I have a W123 300D of the same era, and it performs similarly, when
the regular maintenance you describe is done without fail.

It is a shame that cars designed to be functional, rugged, comfortable
and long-lasting are no longer built.  This is why many of us persist
in maintaining these now thirty-year-old cars that are still
delivering to their design purpose, lo these many years since new.
runbiodiesel - 21 Jul 2009 01:04 GMT
> > I recently drove my 1982 300 TDT over the Kern Plateau to the San
> > Joaquin Valley.  You climb 6000 ft to the top of the plateau on a
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
> in maintaining these now thirty-year-old cars that are still
> delivering to their design purpose, lo these many years since new.

Agreed on all counts. I have had all kinds of cars through the years
and my two W123s continue to amaze me with their superb reliability
and performance year after year. I have a 1982 300TD wagon as well and
with just basic maintenance it runs and rides like a new vehicle.
Likewise my 1979 240D with the nonturbo four cylinder, while gutless,
is so reliable and solid I forget that my trusty daily commuter car is
30 years old.

I agree with Randall that they just don't build them like this
anymore.

You might like this blog by a guy driving his 300TDT all over the
world. Check out the fold out tent that he build on top of the car for
his trip across Africa. I want one!

http://300td.org/
runbiodiesel - 21 Jul 2009 01:04 GMT
> > I recently drove my 1982 300 TDT over the Kern Plateau to the San
> > Joaquin Valley.  You climb 6000 ft to the top of the plateau on a
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
> in maintaining these now thirty-year-old cars that are still
> delivering to their design purpose, lo these many years since new.

On another note, Paul, are you all healed up from your accident? I
hope so.
Paul Fretheim - 22 Jul 2009 13:16 GMT
> > > I recently drove my 1982 300 TDT over the Kern Plateau to the San
> > > Joaquin Valley.  You climb 6000 ft to the top of the plateau on a
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
> On another note, Paul, are you all healed up from your accident? I
> hope so.

Thank you for asking.  I am pretty much healed up, now I just have to
get back in shape from the long layoff and I am working on that.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.