Strange... Since I did not post anything related to carfax????
Er.. well actually you did, though only as a reply to someone else's reply.
Here's what you wrote, 21st August:
"Thanks for the reply... I realize carfax may not report all the details.
I have my suspicions concerning the car with the light more posterior... It
has obviously been repainted. Used Car Dealer, of course, has no clue..."
> >I am presently looking at and comparing two 1986 560sl 's and have a >
>question...
> >One of the cars has the center high mounted stop light on the back edge
of > >the trunk, the other has the light near the leading edge of the trunk,
next > >to the top. Which is correct for the 1986, or are both correct ? I
have
> >run carfax on both vehicles and no crash/repair damage was noted on
either > >car. Both reported the correct model year. > >
> >Any ideas?
> >
> >Thanks...
>
> 1. The light toward the leading edge is standard on 1986-1987 US cars. The
more
> posterior placement is standard on 1988-1989 models.
>
> 2. The car might be a 1986 European 500SL. The body style never had the
centre
> light outside the U.S. Contrary to what most people think, Carfax will
have
> records of grey market imports for model years starting around 1986. This
is
> when MB changed their worldwide VIN format to a 17 digit code that is
similar
> to (but not the same as) the format used on American market cars.
>
> 3. Carfax isn't always a reliable source of accident information.
Sometimes
> accidents don't get reported and even if they do, they don't always show
up on
> Carfax. I was just in an accident where the car was deemed a total loss,
and
> the report given to me (not Carfax) showed a prior accident that didn't
come up
> on the dealer-supplied Carfax report.
>
> 4. Maybe someone messed up the boot lid when trying to close an
overstuffed
> trunk, maybe something fell on it. Those things don't usually get
reported.
> 5. Maybe someone just wanted to update the look of the car (although that
> wouldn't make sense 'cause your average bloke wouldn't know the difference
> anyway).
> Strange... Since I did not post anything related to carfax????
> > Hi RM,
> > I can see your other posts on that day but nothing about instruments, only
> > something about "Carfax". Sorry, looks like it has escaped!
> > Al, Reading UK
> > 1990 500SE 136,000 miles
RM Smith - 11 Sep 2004 02:56 GMT
Oh, Ok... That was a post I issued earlier in the month of August...
Thanks! It had been so long ago that I had forgotten it. I was referring
to a post I issued on the 9th of September. I actually downloaded it at my
office, but when I got home later that evening, it was gone! Crazy!
> Er.. well actually you did, though only as a reply to someone else's reply.
> Here's what you wrote, 21st August:
[quoted text clipped - 55 lines]
> > > Al, Reading UK
> > > 1990 500SE 136,000 miles