>> >> >> >> You both are funny. Now you are both Xed.
>> >> >> >
[quoted text clipped - 56 lines]
> Keep your chest puffed out like a little banty rooster all you'd like. You
> are extremely unimpressive.
>> >> Now back in your corner bitch.
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> imitation. And everyone knows that 'imitation is the sincerest form of
> flattery.'
> >> >> >> >> You both are funny. Now you are both Xed.
> >> >> >> >
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
> > pedophilia seethed to the surface. And let's not forget your penchant for
> > posting a link to NAMBLA's website:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/talk.abortion/msg/6cb0dcde70623a26?dmode=source
> >> Too bad you'd never be man enough to cash all
> >> those checks your mouth is writing. If you were, you'd come to Wichita.
> >
> > It was yourself, bitch, that made the threats, then wanted 'me' to come to
> > 'you.' Remember these exchanges, dumbass:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.abortion/msg/186d44c81f5665b2?dmode=source
> > Keep your chest puffed out like a little banty rooster all you'd like. You
> > are extremely unimpressive.
>
> Wow, you really do have no life. I feel sorry for you're daughter. Do you
> still rape her?
True to form, you inject your fantasies of sex with children into the
conversation, and project your sickness onto others. Except that now, with
your reference to 'rape,' you leave no question why you have such a
fascination with NAMBLA, so much so that you posted links to their website.
You can run in circles all you want, but it is crystal clear that it is
*YOU*, bitch, that spends a huge amount of time fantasizing about being a
pedophile.
> Admitting your problem is the first step to getting help
> from what I hear. Bring you're little 357 to wichita and then we can talk.
First, I have no '357.'
Second, you made all of the initial threats. Either act on them, or shut
that cocksucker in your face and admit that you're just a f.cking blowhard.
Third, *YOU* have the sexual perversion, not me. *You* arbitrarily add it to
the conversation when it isn't even the subject, not me. *YOU* post the
links to NAMBLA, not me. *YOU* project your sexual onto others, not me.
> >> >> Now back in your corner bitch.
> >> >
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> No one is imitating you for some reason.
Oh yes, you f.cking well are, with the exception of your penchant for
constantly including references to your sexual-sickness.
> You just seem to think that anyone
> who disagrees with you is an idiot.
Nope.
People that don't *think* are f.cking idiots. People that can only
conceptualize things in a binary system that allows those things to be
sorted in "for-us-or-against-us" categories are idiots.
You are a f.cking lemming. That makes you a f.cking idiot, in spades.
Plus you're in Kansas, likely a product of their public school system, a
school system not exactly legendary for promoting original thought nor
rational, critical analysis.
> >> Time for
> >> you to start dreaming little man.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Sorry, but I don't dream of waking up in my daughters bed like you do.
Once again, more of your perversions randomly introduced to the exchange.
> You
> got any more you little mama's boy?
A lot more than some sh.t-box, blowhard out of Kansas, that's for damn sure.

Signature
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104
Apatriot #22
Atheist FF/EMT
....and ordained minister
Stork pin recipient: May 1, 2003 -Madelyn
Reasoned Insanity - 06 Feb 2005 01:35 GMT
>> >> >> >> >> You both are funny. Now you are both Xed.
>> >> >> >> >
[quoted text clipped - 79 lines]
> fascination with NAMBLA, so much so that you posted links to their
> website.
Avoiding the question are we? As to the referance post to NAMBLA, I
rememember posting it to prove a point. I just can't really remember what it
was about. However your link you provided simply mentioning it did not
provide any details or the context in which it was used. In fact the link
was totally useless considering the conversation was about wife beating and
you are the one who brought NAMBLA into the conversation.
> You can run in circles all you want, but it is crystal clear that it is
> *YOU*, bitch, that spends a huge amount of time fantasizing about being a
> pedophile.
Crystal clear huh? Is it as clear as the peephole that you have into your
daughters bedroom?
>> Admitting your problem is the first step to getting help
>> from what I hear. Bring you're little 357 to wichita and then we can
>> talk.
>
> First, I have no '357.'
Sorry, I just assumed that was your gun of choice. I seem to recall you
mentioning a 357 more than once.
> Second, you made all of the initial threats. Either act on them, or shut
> that cocksucker in your face and admit that you're just a f.cking
> blowhard.
I don't recall making any threats. I simply invited you to Wichita to try to
back up all the sh.t you spew.
> Third, *YOU* have the sexual perversion, not me. *You* arbitrarily add it
> to
> the conversation when it isn't even the subject, not me.
Actually, as seen by the link you provided, you are the one who brought
NAMBLA into the wife beating conversation.
*YOU* post the
> links to NAMBLA, not me. *YOU* project your sexual onto others, not me.
Want to bring up the original post in which I posted it? Try using it in
context.
>> >> >> Now back in your corner bitch.
>> >> >
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> Oh yes, you f.cking well are, with the exception of your penchant for
> constantly including references to your sexual-sickness.
It's impossible to imitate one as stupid as you without really being
mentally disabled.
>> You just seem to think that anyone
>> who disagrees with you is an idiot.
>
> Nope.
>
> People that don't *think* are f.cking idiots.
Then why don't you start thinking?
People that can only
> conceptualize things in a binary system that allows those things to be
> sorted in "for-us-or-against-us" categories are idiots.
Are you saying that it is wrong to see things in black and white?
> You are a f.cking lemming. That makes you a f.cking idiot, in spades.
What is this fascination with the word "f.cking" that you seem to have?
> Plus you're in Kansas, likely a product of their public school system, a
> school system not exactly legendary for promoting original thought nor
> rational, critical analysis.
Just because I live here doesn't mean I was raised here. It seems you are
the one who has a problem with original thought and critical analysis.
>> >> Time for
>> >> you to start dreaming little man.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Once again, more of your perversions randomly introduced to the exchange.
Once again you avoid you're own problems.
>> You
>> got any more you little mama's boy?
>
> A lot more than some sh.t-box, blowhard out of Kansas, that's for damn
> sure.
Really? Where is it? Blowing sh.t out your a.s don't count.