> By the way, anything useful from carfax.com is not free.
> "Records" are defined by them as significant events
I've received CARFAX reports on previous vehicles I was researching,
and not all "Records" were as significant as "Was the car in a reported
accident" or "Was this car labeled a lemon." I guess no news is good
news, but I feel like a list like these 6 records (from an actual
CARFAX reort) is only good to see the mileage history:
02/24/1994 Colorado Title or registration issued
02/24/1994 Colorado Title or registration issued
02/26/1995 18,314 Colorado Passed emissions inspection
01/31/1996 Colorado Title or registration issued
01/31/1996 26,767 Colorado Passed emissions inspection
05/12/1998 44,136 Colorado Passed emissions inspection
So in other words, if you use the free part of carfax, you cannot know
what those 6 records say, so it is (IMO) not very useful. Notice how
the first two records are dups.
> If one is about to perhaps spend many thousands of dollars on a used
> vehicle, is the modest Carfax fee not worth it?
Absolutely, I agree with you here!