An Australian friend of mine here in London got a good bonus and
decided to but a new Merc SLK. He's a conservative driver and was quite
happy to order the small 4 cylinder model. But the dealer let him
borrow the 350 version and he loved it. £35k with all sorts of
options.
But Jon has never owned an automatic and decided, with my enthusiastic
backing, because I'll get to drive the car a bit, to forgo the 7 speed
auto, save £700 and opt for the 6 speed manual version of the 350.
But both SLKs he test drove were autos.
Anyway, the deal is that they will either deliver the car to your door
or fly you and partner business class to Germany so you can drive the
car back to the UK yourself. He opted for the latter.
The thing is, after several thousand kms, he still can't get to grips
with the gears. Says it is impossible to drive smoothly around town.
Claims the shift is heavy and clunky, much worse than on the old 1988
Ford Falcon wagon he had in Melbourne some years back. The 6 year old
manual Audi A4 he had before the Merc was a dream to drive in
comparison. He still loves the Merc but regrets not going for the auto.
I feel a bit guilty for saying go for the manual, especially given the
bad press that manual Mercs do get from time to time, but I had no idea
he hadn't actually test driven one. The dealer now tells him, "Well,
Mercedes don't make many manuals..." as if that's an excuse.
I haven't driven the car yet but will this weekend, I wonder if it
really is that bad.
Or maybe the box will loosen up over time. Anyone else got any related
experience?
Thanx, James
Dori A Schmetterling - 16 Mar 2005 14:36 GMT
A bit.
I hope that's English understatement!
DAS
For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
---
[...]
I feel a bit guilty for saying go for the manual,
[...]
Rodney T. Grill - 16 Mar 2005 18:20 GMT
> Claims the shift is heavy and clunky, much worse than on the old 1988
> Ford Falcon wagon he had in Melbourne some years back.
I find that hard to believe.
> The 6 year old
> manual Audi A4 he had before the Merc was a dream to drive in
> comparison.
Now *that* I believe. Audi makes a great manual tranny. MBZ is good also,
but they make better automatics. I have yet to see a decent manual in an
American brand.

Signature
- RODNEY
Martin Joseph - 16 Mar 2005 20:44 GMT
>> Claims the shift is heavy and clunky, much worse than on the old 1988
>> Ford Falcon wagon he had in Melbourne some years back.
>
> I find that hard to believe.
I don't American cars in general have very sloppy shifters, rather
then much "Notchier" feel of ZF like I had im my BMW, or my wife has in
her Volvo....
Now clutches are a different story.
>> The 6 year old
>> manual Audi A4 he had before the Merc was a dream to drive in
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> also, but they make better automatics. I have yet to see a decent
> manual in an American brand.
Bah, Guess you never drove a 1969 Charger 440 4 speed?
Peter W Peternouschek - 16 Mar 2005 23:36 GMT
Bah...again ...also
How about a 63 Fuel injected
Corvette with Muncie close ratio four speed
and 4.11 gears
> >> Claims the shift is heavy and clunky, much worse than on the old 1988
> >> Ford Falcon wagon he had in Melbourne some years back.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> > manual in an American brand.
> Bah, Guess you never drove a 1969 Charger 440 4 speed?
pool man - 18 Mar 2005 21:23 GMT
65 DODGE DART with 3 ON THE TREE
we called it find a gear
the case, minus a few cans!
jshugg@westpac.com.au - 19 Mar 2005 08:43 GMT
> An Australian friend of mine here in London got a good bonus and
> decided to but a new Merc SLK. He's a conservative driver and was quite
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
> Thanx, James
I took the car for a quick spin around Hyde Park in central London last
night. I honestly don't know what his problem is. The box is heavier to
shift than your typical front drive buzz box but the throws are short
and precise. The clutch is not forgiving if you just stomp on it and
drop it as you shift, but smooth and fast gear gearchanges are possible
- even from the dreaded first to second - if you think about what you
are doing. I'm sure he'll get quite used to it over time; I suspect his
Audi softened his driving skills a bit!
Great exhaust note with the top down, and boy is that car fast! Why
don't Mercedes put out a 280 SLK, or dare I say it even an 270 SLK DI?
The 200 might seem a bit small, but the 350 is a bit of overkill!
Anyway, I know Mercedes do excellent automatic tranmissions, but the
manual 350 is terrific in my view. Unless you are after a hairdresser's
car, I don't see why you would want to dull its perfomance edge and
driving fun with a slush box.
Actually, what about a 350 SL with a manual gearbox? It wouldn't drag
off a Porsche but it would still have decent poke, and be great fun to
drive.
James (no longer felling guilty for suggesting he order the manual!)
Dori A Schmetterling - 19 Mar 2005 23:14 GMT
There's a 200 already, as I am sure you know.
http://www.mercedes-benz.de/content/media_library/germany/mpc_germany/de/mercede
s-benz_deutschland/personenwagen/home/produkte/neufahrzeuge/slk-klasse/preise/pr
eisliste_slk-klasse0.object-Single-MEDIA.tmp/SLK_171_2005.pdf
I am sure an intermediate engine will become available. Maybe a diesel,
too. There's a CLK diesel already, after all.
DAS
For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
---
[...]
Why
don't Mercedes put out a 280 SLK, or dare I say it even an 270 SLK DI?
The 200 might seem a bit small, but the 350 is a bit of overkill!
[...]