> >> > Diesel oil delivered for heating oil will be red or blue in color and
> > the
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> Huw
There ya go. You answered your own question.
Huw - 08 May 2005 14:04 GMT
>> >> > Diesel oil delivered for heating oil will be red or blue in color
>> >> > and
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
> There ya go. You answered your own question.
It is a question I wanted you to answer because you implied a different
specification for 'moisture content' and particle contamination of various
fuel at a point in time. " At one time the specification for diesel and
heating oil differed mainly in
respect to moisture content and the size and count of suspended particulates
with diesel being the more refined of the two."
In fact neither diesel fuel nor heating oil typically absorbs water so that
a moisture content can be meaningful. Water pools to the bottom of either
fuel's reservoir and, given a tap, can be drained out. Water is always a
contaminant in such cases and there is no acceptable limit for it for either
fuel.
Huw
Chas Hurst - 08 May 2005 16:48 GMT
> >> All fuels are prone to water contamination in storage apart from pressure
> >> stored products such as CNG or LPG and all can be stored in surface tanks
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> heating oil differed mainly in
> respect to moisture content and the size and count of suspended
particulates
> with diesel being the more refined of the two."
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Huw
Well that simply isn't so. Water can be suspended in diesel or heating oil.
Do a google search for "water suspended in diesel fuel".
Huw - 08 May 2005 17:18 GMT
>> >> All fuels are prone to water contamination in storage apart from
> pressure
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
> oil.
> Do a google search for "water suspended in diesel fuel".
Water can and does especially if there is also bacterial contamination but
it is not particularly common, certainly not where I am, and is still a
contaminant with no acceptable limit. It should not be present and if
present without bacterial infection will settle out in a matter of hours
after precipitation unless the precipitation is severe enough to create an
emulsion. This is unlikely in normal automotive use although droplets, if
water is present, will be suspended in moving vehicle fuel tanks but which
will be separated at the, almost universally fitted, sediment bowl or
agglomerator.
If there was an accepted and differing specification for various fuels'
"moisture content" in this respect then please show us. Otherwise you are
pissing into the wind. Water, unless separated from the fuel, will damage
and impair the efficient function of diesel engines and heating systems
alike. It also corrodes the bottom of metal fuel tanks.
Huw
> All fuels are prone to water contamination in storage apart from pressure
> stored products such as CNG or LPG and all can be stored in surface tanks
> except petrol, though underground tanks are also prone to water ingress and
> fuel leaks at various points.
So if I understand you correctly, you can't park your car outside because it
has a gasoline (petrol) tank?
This is nuts. I know of lots of places that have above ground storage of
gasoline (petrol) with no ill effects.
Why would you suggest that the tank being above ground would be any more or
less prone to water problems? I think the reason some places require
underground tanks is for fire safety considerations.

Signature
Roger Shoaf
About the time I had mastered getting the toothpaste back in the tube, then
they come up with this striped stuff.
Huw - 09 May 2005 19:05 GMT
>> All fuels are prone to water contamination in storage apart from pressure
>> stored products such as CNG or LPG and all can be stored in surface tanks
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> it
> has a gasoline (petrol) tank?
Your understanding is deficient.
> This is nuts. I know of lots of places that have above ground storage of
> gasoline (petrol) with no ill effects.
Above ground storage of petrol is illegal in large parts of the globe.
> Why would you suggest that the tank being above ground would be any more
> or
> less prone to water problems? I think the reason some places require
> underground tanks is for fire safety considerations.
I did not suggest either would be worse than the other and you are correct
that fire safety is the reason.
Huw
trader4@optonline.net - 09 May 2005 20:34 GMT
"> Why would you suggest that the tank being above ground would be any
more
> or
> less prone to water problems? I think the reason some places require
> underground tanks is for fire safety considerations. "
The reason above ground is more prone to water problems is because the
tank temperature changes over a wide range and frequently. When it
gets hot, air moves out of the tank. When it gets cold, air re-enters
the tank, bringing moisture with it and as the temp drops, the moisture
condenses into water. Underground tanks are in a stable temp
environment. How much of a problem this is depends a lot on climate.
You obviously are going to get more condensation in area with humid air
and wide temp swings.
Martin Joseph - 10 May 2005 08:43 GMT
> Why would you suggest that the tank being above ground would be any more or
> less prone to water problems? I think the reason some places require
> underground tanks is for fire safety considerations.
Above ground storage is superior for leak detection, but for the same
reason, more of a fire hazard.
Nothing to do with moisture AFAIK. Either way tank contents can be
contaminated.