Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Mercedes-Benz Cars / May 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

300SD needs a little gas to start

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Mia - 12 May 2005 18:46 GMT
Hi,

My 1984 300SD with 127k always needs a little gas to start it.  I turn
the key, wait for glowplugs in 40 degree weather (May in Michigan,
lemme tell ya), press gas lightly, and it starts right up (with
mandatory little cloud of grey smoke).  It wants to idle at about
350-450 and almost chokes, but it sounds most healthy at 650-750 with a
little gas.

Valve adjustment time?

Thanks a lot!

Mia
Henry Kolesnik - 12 May 2005 20:13 GMT
You might have an open glow plug or 2.  Check the resistance of each one,
they should all be below an ohm.

Signature

73
Hank WD5JFR

> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Mia
Mia - 12 May 2005 21:07 GMT
How can glow plugs be an issue with stalling when idling?

Mia
Martin Joseph - 12 May 2005 21:53 GMT
> How can glow plugs be an issue with stalling when idling?

The glow plugs make thing go smoother until the engine warms up.  So a
rough idle when COLD can be caused by glow plugs.

Marty
Mia - 13 May 2005 02:01 GMT
T.G. , I'm wondering what, in your mind, is the perfect combination of
microchip-controlled components and plain mechanical ones?  Once when
my Chevy just died, the reason wasn't the starter, or the battery, or
the ignition.  It was the $250 circuit board that regulated fuel
distribution.  Obviously, I wished for no chips in my car AT ALL.  Now
I don't have chips, and as you mentioned, the tranny on my Benz is not
as smooth as tranny on my old 1991 Cavalier.

There has to be a happy medium or computer chips that are more reliable
and mechanical parts that fit snugger.

Respectfully.

Mia J.
T.G. Lambach - 13 May 2005 02:54 GMT
The mechanical, if well maintained, will outlast the electronic, IMHO.
But, that said, the mechanical is frozen in time whereas the new, being
electronic, progresses and is cheaper to make, but not to repair. So
cars, like TVs and appliances will become obsolete more quickly and more
absolutely and so go to the bone yard sooner than the old mechanical
cars. Their complexity is software driven and software ties one to its
author's plans so the manufacturers and dealers will determine their
products useful lives more so than the buyers.

In 1980 I paid about $28K for my then new 300SD. Since 1980 the consumer
price index has risen 2.3X so that 300SD car should cost $65.7K today.
But it lacks ABS, dual front, side or curtain airbags, ESP, Brake
assist, Pre-Safe, dual climate control or a pretty good gas V-8 with an
electronic 7 speed - all of which are in a new S430 that costs about
$76K today. All those new features were added for about $10K! I paid
about $3.5K for my first Mac 512K system and $1.5K for a vastly superior
iMac.

These old cars are just a breather from the relentlessness of progress
and its costs. I enjoy my 300SD on that basis but buy new, disposable,
cars too.
Wan-ning Tan - 13 May 2005 06:32 GMT
Excellent statement!!

I think price (to make) and flexibility/functionality are the major
factors driving the manufacturers towards electronic control.  How many
experts/genius are there who can design/enhance a diesel injection pump?
 How many programmers can write code?  There are many more programmers
and they probably have much cheaper salary.

I have seen a literature describing the optimized timing parameter in
relation to engine temperature and rpm.  I don't recall the car maker or
the engine type.  Based on the graph, I can't imagine any mechanical
solution, at least not with any reasonable cost.  Even an electronic
solution will probably be based on a large parameter table instead of a
few formula.

Also, for manufacturers, it is much cheaper to correct mistakes by
reloading programs than redesigning/replacing parts.  I believe one day
owners may not even need to go back to dealers to reload the programs,
and may not even know it happens.

However, as a owner (and a DIYer), I prefer mechanical cars.

> The mechanical, if well maintained, will outlast the electronic, IMHO.
> But, that said, the mechanical is frozen in time whereas the new, being
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> author's plans so the manufacturers and dealers will determine their
> products useful lives more so than the buyers.
Martin Joseph - 14 May 2005 18:56 GMT
> The mechanical, if well maintained, will outlast the electronic, IMHO.

This actually shouldn't be true,  although it often is.  Autos are a
very hostile climate for electronics,  and any electronics
designers/vendors have done a poor job of building/ruggedizing this.

As we go forward and these system become better, this should move in
the direction of electronics being more durable and reliable then
mechanical systems.

My 2c (US)
Marty

PS I repair electronics/computers for a living and like to have cars
that don't have any...
cp - 14 May 2005 02:30 GMT
> The glow plugs make thing go smoother until the engine warms up.  So a rough idle when COLD can be caused by glow plugs.

To get my 300D jalopy up and running smoothly (it getting valve adjustment and chain changed next week) I glow the plugs 4-5 times
before actually starting the engine, at which it starts very smoothly and "quietly" with no "gas"; am I causing severe premature
damage to the glow plugs by doing this?

TIA
cp
Q - 18 May 2005 20:51 GMT
>> The glow plugs make thing go smoother until the engine warms up.  So
>> a rough idle when COLD can be caused by glow plugs.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> TIA
> cp

Don't hesitate to put in a new vacuum pump when you replace your timing
chain.  

A vac pump failure will negatively interfere with your new chain and ruin
your day!
cp - 19 May 2005 05:19 GMT
> Don't hesitate to put in a new vacuum pump when you replace your timing
> chain.
>
> A vac pump failure will negatively interfere with your new chain and ruin
> your day!

Glad it's already been replaced, shoulda replaced the chain too...

I gots me a good (and cheap) Benz mechanic in Chiliwack BC who works out of a farm that looks as if its cashcrop is a field of old
benzes:-) , if anyone in the BC lower mainland area needs a good mechanic email me.

cp
T.G. Lambach - 12 May 2005 21:25 GMT
In my 25 year experience with this engine it doesn't start smoothly when
cold, like a gas engine. There may be a marginal glow plug - they last
about 100K miles - but remember, its a compression engine and until it
runs for about 30 seconds it may have a few misfires.

I don't touch the throttle until the engine fires, then I shift into
gear and give it a bit of throttle to drive off.

In very cold weather the engine should be glowed a couple of times. ON,
glow, wait 10 seconds, OFF, ON, glow again wait ten seconds and START.
M-B suggests flooring the accelerator, others say NO that, the
additional fuel quenches the then hot glow plugs. I've never floored it.

The shifts are sometimes a bit snappy, especially when the transmission
is cold. Clean transmission fluid and a clean filter may help but "they
all (occasionally) do that."

Remember, we're all getting used to cars that have electronically
controlled engines and transmissions that shift almost imperceptively
(the gas engine's timing is briefly retarded to cut its power prior to
an up shift); this c.1980 machinery simply can't achieve 2005 levels of
smoothness and lack of noise and vibration. Likewise, the old steering
boxes can't match the terseness of rack and pinion systems. That's why
new cars are bought - they really are better - and cost a lot more!
Jeff - 13 May 2005 04:04 GMT
My brother has a car that does the same thing... It almost always starts
better if the accelerator is pressed one time before starting.  It has about
240k miles.

My 1983, on the other hand will always start without pressing the
accelerator first.  It is a 1983 300D with 166k miles.  I would check the
glow plugs to see what condition they are in.  Also do the valve adjustment
if you haven't already.

I had a 1982 300D as well with unknown mileage, and it started better if the
accelerator was pumped before cranking unless the engine was close to
operating temperature.

When very cold (+13°F here) the 1983 started outside in the cold without
being started for over two weeks, and without being plugged in.  It had
Delvac 1 oil in it at the time.  I glowed it two times and when I started
cranking, I held the accelerator to the floor and held the starter.  It took
about 20 seconds for it to start firing.  The owner's manual suggest you can
crank for about one minute (maybe even two, I don't remember).  The key is
to crank it until it starts firing and not interrupt the process.  When you
hear the engine start firing start easing off the accelerator slowly so the
engine doesn't over-rev.

> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Mia
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.