Hey there bear guy! Thanks for the info about business week article.
Now I gotta go ta tha trailer nex door an git tha ole boy thar ta read
it ta me!! I have looked at the BMW, and that weird little mess in
there that controls everything seems a bit complex for an old geezer
whut caint read two gud. Them ole kudzu burner looks OK, but I think
the seat is a tad smaller than the noQual ShrimpMobile. So I am going
to look at the new ShrimpMobile and see what it is like. If it is no
good - a high probability I fear - then I will go buy a used kudzu
burner for a year till the new cheap MB imitation LS comes out in 07.
The current ShrimpMobile is getting kinda old.
mcbrue readinglychallanged under the bridge in the trailer down by the
river
96 S420
The sad thing is most of you could not buy a new S500 if MB offered 30
year financing.
So getting screwed on maintenance does not matter to you.
But if you paid 90 grand for one you might have a different perspective.
The closest you can get is a "test drive".
Hernando Correa - 09 Aug 2005 05:26 GMT
> The sad thing is most of you could not buy a new S500 if MB offered 30
> year financing.
> So getting screwed on maintenance does not matter to you.
> But if you paid 90 grand for one you might have a different perspective.
> The closest you can get is a "test drive".
I couldn't agree with you more, especially when other luxury car makers
still offer the 3 or 4 yr. free maintenance.
greek_philosophizer - 09 Aug 2005 17:39 GMT
If the negativity were removed from your comment
you would be left with inadvertently having raised an
interesting point. They could probably sell more cars
with longer financing ( like 7 to 10 years ) if they could
also throw in a warranty and maintenance for that
term. Many people keep them that long.
.
rl1856 - 20 Aug 2005 02:03 GMT
Quite true. Domestically, auto makers earn their profit from financing
and resale rather than the sale of the new car.
Inflating the MSRP to cover maintenance, combined with longer term
financeing could potentially create a long term, highly profitable
revenue stream. However, this business model would require that
consumers change their approach to auto buying. Right now, a car is
viewed as a disposable fashion item. Most drive what is trendy right
now, then dump it in favor of the next hot thing. Migrating to a
longer ownership cycle would require consumers to view cars as
investments rather than disposable commodities.
Best,
JD
rl1856 - 20 Aug 2005 02:04 GMT
Quite true. Domestically, auto makers earn their profit from financing
and resale rather than the sale of the new car.
Inflating the MSRP to cover maintenance, combined with longer term
financeing could potentially create a long term, highly profitable
revenue stream. However, this business model would require that
consumers change their approach to auto buying. Right now, a car is
viewed as a disposable fashion item. Most drive what is trendy right
now, then dump it in favor of the next hot thing. Migrating to a
longer ownership cycle would require consumers to view cars as
investments rather than disposable commodities.
Best,
JD
cp - 10 Aug 2005 03:46 GMT
> The sad thing is most of you could not buy a new S500 if MB offered 30
> year financing.
30 year financing on a S500?? Sign me up! Will they take my '81 300D and '66 200S as trades?
cp
cp - 10 Aug 2005 03:51 GMT
> The sad thing is most of you could not buy a new S500 if MB offered 30
> year financing.
> So getting screwed on maintenance does not matter to you.
> But if you paid 90 grand for one you might have a different perspective.
> The closest you can get is a "test drive".
yeh yeh, we heard you the first time! I'll now crawl back into my 1981 300D in shame that I can't afford a new S500...
cp