Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Mercedes-Benz Cars / August 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

lousy AM reception

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
MB addict - 08 Aug 2005 23:42 GMT
98 C280, my AM reception on this as well as on my previous MB's is just
bad. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
MrGrumpy - 09 Aug 2005 00:03 GMT
I'm yet to find anything with good AM reception

> 98 C280, my AM reception on this as well as on my previous MB's is just
> bad. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
T.G. Lambach - 09 Aug 2005 00:33 GMT
Some models have an antenna amplifier. These sometimes have corroded
grounds that cause poor reception. The fix is to either replace the amp
or solder a (additional) ground wire to the copper rivets.
lule_220 - 09 Aug 2005 07:18 GMT
> 98 C280, my AM reception on this as well as on my previous MB's is just
> bad. Any suggestions would be appreciated.

Let somebody explain to me (Europe) about your (US) fascination about AM
band, and their limited bandwith, poor and full of noise sound quality...
This is not a first time I read about this. Here in Europe an Amplitude Modulation band
is right for technical museum :-)
CaptainW116 - 09 Aug 2005 07:41 GMT
> > 98 C280, my AM reception on this as well as on my previous MB's is just
> > bad. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> This is not a first time I read about this. Here in Europe an Amplitude Modulation band
> is right for technical museum :-)
Talk radio.
Guenter Scholz - 09 Aug 2005 14:10 GMT
that's easy.  AM works great at night .... when everyone does their cruising

cheers, guenter

>> 98 C280, my AM reception on this as well as on my previous MB's is just
>> bad. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>This is not a first time I read about this. Here in Europe an Amplitude Modulation band
>is right for technical museum :-)
T.G. Lambach - 09 Aug 2005 14:43 GMT
It's not a fascination but rather pragmatism - try driving in, say, west
Texas or Wyoming, places where the choice is all of three or four FM
stations, and scratchy AM is a welcome addition. Then there are the
sports fans who want to listen to "their team" play and the politicos
who want to be reassured of their opinions by talk radio etc.

One gets spoiled by choice in large metropolitan areas, it's not that
way in the large open spaces.
Howard Nelson - 09 Aug 2005 23:09 GMT
> > 98 C280, my AM reception on this as well as on my previous MB's is just
> > bad. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> This is not a first time I read about this. Here in Europe an Amplitude Modulation band
> is right for technical museum :-)

Here is my opinion. In the 80's when AM was put in the technical museum in
Europe licenses for AM stations were very inexpensive in the US. They were
purchased by (for the media world) marginals, kooks and a few corporations.
What came out of this was an interesting mix of Kook radio, ethnic radio and
eclectic programming which persists to this day. FM stations were all
corporatized and now for the most now offer bland computerized playlists. FM
radio is like going to the Mall and AM is like going to the Flea Market
(peoples market or bazaar). Interestingly AM radio licenses are now very
dear. Purchasing one 20 years ago might have been a very shrewd investment.
Howard
lule_220 - 10 Aug 2005 06:53 GMT
> Here is my opinion. In the 80's when AM was put in the technical museum in
> Europe licenses for AM stations were very inexpensive in the US. They were
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> dear. Purchasing one 20 years ago might have been a very shrewd investment.
> Howard

thx, now is much more clearly to me.

regards
Rockman59 - 14 Aug 2005 19:10 GMT
In the 80's when AM was put in the technical museum in
Europe licenses for AM stations were very inexpensive in the US
_________________________________________
AM licenses were never "inexpensive" especially in major markets.  As FM
became the major medium for music formats AM locked in on talk and sports.
If you want to listen to baseball, football, etc you are pretty much going
to be using AM...with the exception of some sports now being available on XM
and Sirius, the satellite stations.  And when traveling the US  mountain
west there are many many miles of highway where your only signal will be AM.
The FCC has been making  very low power limited coverage AM frequencies
avaialble...and granted some of these may have been purchased by "kooks" as
you say, But the price of a radio station, be it AM or FM, has always been
determined by just one thing.....cash flow and profitability.  No matter
what format, if it makes a lot of $$$ you can bet the price will be high.
And in the larger markets even if the station is not doing well the license
is still going to be pretty pricey as someone will buy it and hope to put a
format on the air that makes the big bucks.....
Bogart - 20 Aug 2005 12:25 GMT
my 98 slk has the worst am reception of any car ive owned
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.