Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Mercedes-Benz Cars / August 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

1996 320 E Mercedes

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
ballerinagul - 13 Aug 2005 03:42 GMT
I have been trying to solve problems with my check engine light this
entire summer.    I have a 1996 E 320 with 150,000 miles on it.  I
bought the car new in '96.    Lately, I have had a terrible time trying
to determine the cause of my check engine light coming on.  I use a
private car shop to do my repairs.   He assured me that he could fix
the car with no problem.   He has replaced the knock sensor, the
battery, the upper and lower control arm bushings the  air mass sensor,
and  the rear oxygen sensor.  The last time I took the car in, the
owner of the shop decided to take my car to the local dealership to
have them run test (says he didn't have to right equipment to do so.)
He used their diagnosis to do the last couple of repairs.  Overall this
summer  I have spent over $3000.00 on this car. The light has just come
on again.  He now tells me that the model E 320 that I have had a lot
of kinks in it because it was the first year this particular model was
made and that it is difficult to repair all the sensors.  It's not
him it's the car.  Is anyone aware of special problems with the E
320?  Any advice for me?
Dana - 13 Aug 2005 04:19 GMT
My advice would be to forget it IF the vehicle is running ok . If not you'll
have to take it to the dealer and let them figure it out . The control arm
bushing certainly have nothing to do with the light appearing . I'm assume
you had a different problem when the shop did that repair . When you have a
10 year old German car with miles on it , you're not going to live happily
ever after.
                                                       -Dana
>I have been trying to solve problems with my check engine light this
> entire summer.    I have a 1996 E 320 with 150,000 miles on it.  I
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> him it's the car.  Is anyone aware of special problems with the E
> 320?  Any advice for me?
cp - 13 Aug 2005 08:26 GMT
> When you have a 10 year old German car with miles on it , you're not going to live happily ever after.

I don't know about "ever after" but we have 5 old benzes, 2 of my old guys have over 300,000 miles each and we're quite happy with
them.

cp
ballerinagul - 13 Aug 2005 16:16 GMT
Hi Dana,

The car runs fine.  It's just that I live in Ga and the car will not
pass emission testing if it has the check engine light on.  They will
automatically fail the car.   The dealership is my next step but I may
just wait closer to the time that it's due for emissions testing.
Thanks for your reply.
Ballerinagul
Peter W Peternouschek - 13 Aug 2005 04:43 GMT
None of the issues you mention are unusual for a car with 150k miles. Power
train trouble codes can be retrieved via most generic low cost code readers.
Manufacurer specific codes however require the exotic code readers that the
dealers have or the independent MB shops that made that capital investment.
I really don't buy the "your car is new and has kinks in it rationale". It
is usually used by mechanics that really don't understand the systems they
are trying to fix. A lot of these guys are parts replacers that will keep
replacing parts untill it is fixed or you run out of money. I would suggest
you look around for another independent MB shop that has the equipment and
trained employees to really fix the problem.
My 2 cents
Peter

> I have been trying to solve problems with my check engine light this
> entire summer.    I have a 1996 E 320 with 150,000 miles on it.  I
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> him it's the car.  Is anyone aware of special problems with the E
> 320?  Any advice for me?
ballerinagul - 13 Aug 2005 16:20 GMT
Thanks for your reply Peter,
Should I look for shops that have exotic code readers?  By chance would
they have to be registered somewhere or do I just ask using that
terminology?
ballerinagul - 13 Aug 2005 16:20 GMT
Thanks for your reply Peter,
Should I look for shops that have exotic code readers?  By chance would
they have to be registered somewhere or do I just ask using that
terminology?
T.G. Lambach - 13 Aug 2005 05:42 GMT
The check engine light indicates a fault and faults generate diagnostic
codes. Our responses are total guesses unless you provide us the
diagnostic code that's been generated by the check engine light.

Upper and lower control arm bushings are wear items that have absolutely
nothing to do with the engine's check engine light so please stick to
the subject and something might actually be accomplished.

I own a '97 E320 and would like to help you.
ballerinagul - 13 Aug 2005 16:10 GMT
Thank you for your response. I apologize for my ignorance about what is
an engine light item and what is not.  I'm looking at the latest work
order that was a diagnostic test done by the dealership for my mechanic
to use in repairing the car.    It states that A 150383 short test.
found in hfm -sfi- self adpt'n limit knock sensor 2 signal open
circuit.  nec. to perform hfmsfi individicual componetnt function test.
nec. to perform fuel hyd. press test.  found engine needs wiring
harness, airmass me. ter, knock sensors. My mechanic in turnreplaced
the engine harness, air mass sensor and rear oxygen sensor.  To my
knowledge, he did not take the car back over to the shop for an
after-check.  I don't know if that is necessary or not and I noticed
that he only replaced the rear knock sensor and not the front one.  The
dignosis indicated knock sensors.  Any help would be appreciated.  And
again, excuse my ignorance.
T.G. Lambach - 13 Aug 2005 22:09 GMT
I reread your original message. This 3.2L engine has been produced since
about 1992. Yes, the 210 model CAR was new in '96 but not its engine or
transmission. Your mechanic is mistaken to blame the car, IMHO, instead
of himself for this mess.

Your choice is:
1. Learn much more about engines and codes than you ever wanted to know, or
2. Take it to a shop that has the M-B code reader and get their ESTIMATE
to fix it, and
3. Relegate your mechanic to routine tasks like oil changes for that's
his level of competence, IMHO.

I want to think about it a bit and will write again.

Tom
T.G. Lambach - 14 Aug 2005 00:45 GMT
You asked if there was anything "known" about this engine. I live in
California and my '97 E320 gets a more through SMOG check than most
other cars because this engine fails the test more frequently. I don't
know why, there are lots of these cars here; it must be so statistically.

Let's start at the beginning.

Engine runs well but check engine light is ON. This started earlier this
summer.

Does the dash board display show a message?  Like "Check engine
electronics"? If not, what?

Was the engine last tuned up - new spark plugs etc. within the last 25K
miles?

These parts have been replaced already: engine wiring harness ($ ouch),
rear O2 sensor, rear knock sensor, and air mass meter.

Dealer suggests fuel pressure be checked and some individual components
be checked.

There's not much else left to replace. Front knock sensor (I believe
there is one), crank position sensor (I say that as an item, not
necessarily as a candidate). This engine is also known to clog its EGR
(exhaust gas recirculation) pipe; that could be a possibility.

I suggest you take it to a M-B dealer for diagnosis and a repair
estimate. This will cost about $100.
Don't whine, instead, say you're thinking of buying a new M-B in six or
twelve months but in the meantime need to get this one fixed.

I too had a "Check Engine" incident, at 38K miles. My code reader
reported PO170 "fuel trim". I asked others (here) what that meant - in
English. Various possibilities were mentioned, too many to attack all.
Paid M-B dealer $70 for diagnosis and repair estimate to learn: Air Mass
Sensor: $500 - $600 estimate. Removed it, cleaned it and erased code, no
"check engine" message so far, but it's still early days. Will replace
it if message reoccurs; part costs $270 on internet.

You car's problem isn't solved but I hope this suggestion helps resolve it.

Tom


ballerinagul - 14 Aug 2005 05:50 GMT
Thanks for your suggestion.  I will be taking my car to the dealership
next week.  To answer your question, the dashboard displays check
engine electronics.  New spark plugs have been put in 7k
ago.  The air mass sensor was replaced but the diagnostic referred to
an air mass meter.  Do you know if these are one in the same?

In looking at your list of what is left to replace, I can even narrow
it down further .. the egr pipe was replaced in 3/05.  The front knock
sensor hasn't been replaced since 1999 so it is also a possibility.

I'm shocked that some of the parts can be removed and cleaned and still
function as opposed to being replaced.(One of the things they never
tell you)

I will keep you posted .

ballerinagul
T.G. Lambach - 14 Aug 2005 06:39 GMT
My fault: air mass meter and air mass sensor are the same -  it measures
the air inhaled by engine so correct fuel amount can be metered into the
engine.

Well, I'll soon see if an air mass meter can be successfully cleaned. My
car may still be in its code cycle.

I don't drive it much, 38K miles in 10 years. I have time to toy with
things like an air mass meter.

I'm curious about your car's problem and would appreciate knowing the
outcome.

Tom
RW - 13 Aug 2005 16:36 GMT
I have a 96 E 320 and I am having the same issue.  Doesn't affect the car's
performance as well.  I have had the Mass Air Flow sensor replaced but
continue to get an error that the codes are calling a adaptation error
similar to your description.  The next suggestion I am getting from my
mechanic is to look at the wiring harness.  Generally once he has pulled the
codes and reset the car is fine for a few days/weeks.  I also live in
Georgia and got my emission checked a day after having it reset and it was
fine.

I'm very interested in your outcome and look forward to seeing it posted if
you find a resolution.

RW

>I have been trying to solve problems with my check engine light this
> entire summer.    I have a 1996 E 320 with 150,000 miles on it.  I
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> him it's the car.  Is anyone aware of special problems with the E
> 320?  Any advice for me?
Cheesehead - 13 Aug 2005 18:38 GMT
With many code check systems that you can purchase @ walmart,
or have done @ you local AutoZone, resetting the check engine
light is a small matter.  Then take it in for inspection.

Collin
T.G. Lambach - 13 Aug 2005 21:26 GMT
That won't work. The engine's computer runs a cycle of diagonistic
tests, X numbers of starts, so many warm-ups some miles at freeway speed
before it illuminates the check engine light.

The code reader shows if one or more of these diagnostics is incomplete
- exactly to prevent someone from erasing the codes just prior to an
emissions inspection.
Lee - 14 Aug 2005 13:18 GMT
Self adaption errors are caused when the air mass sensor and the Oxygen
sensor don't agree. The air mass sensor measures the amount of air going
into the engine. The ECU then injects the exact quantity of fuel the give
the perfect fuel/air ratio.The oxygen sensor measures the exhaust gasses to
see if the correct air/fuel ratio was achieved. If it wasn't, it can adapt
its fuel mapping to allow for wear in the injection system. When the ECU can
no longer compensate, it logs a fault and puts the light on.
The Air mass sensor is a very common cause of this problem but you've
changed this already. Other areas to check would be O2 sensor (replace),
fuel injectors (can be checked at a Bosch centre) or air leaks after the air
mass sensor.
> That won't work. The engine's computer runs a cycle of diagonistic tests,
> X numbers of starts, so many warm-ups some miles at freeway speed before
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> exactly to prevent someone from erasing the codes just prior to an
> emissions inspection.
alan - 14 Aug 2005 15:37 GMT
I have a 96 e230 with 160,000 miles on.  I had a problem earlier this year
with the coolant level light coming on.  The level of coolant was ok and
after running many test I ended up taking it to the dealer to get it
checked.  It tuned out that there was a fault on my window washer fluid
sensor. ( yes .. the water bottle for washing the windows! )  This was very
frustrating as the washer bottle light did not come one and the water bottle
was full.  Anyway, spent £20 on a new sensor for the window washer bottle
and this fixed the problem.  I don't think if would have ever spotted this
with taking to the dealer.

I'm still amazed how the water level sensor in the water bottle could have
caused the engine coolant light to come on.  still .. the joys of electronic
systems in cars!

>I have been trying to solve problems with my check engine light this
> entire summer.    I have a 1996 E 320 with 150,000 miles on it.  I
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> him it's the car.  Is anyone aware of special problems with the E
> 320?  Any advice for me?
alan - 14 Aug 2005 15:37 GMT
I have a 96 e230 with 160,000 miles on.  I had a problem earlier this year
with the coolant level light coming on.  The level of coolant was ok and
after running many test I ended up taking it to the dealer to get it
checked.  It tuned out that there was a fault on my window washer fluid
sensor. ( yes .. the water bottle for washing the windows! )  This was very
frustrating as the washer bottle light did not come one and the water bottle
was full.  Anyway, spent £20 on a new sensor for the window washer bottle
and this fixed the problem.  I don't think if would have ever spotted this
with taking to the dealer.

I'm still amazed how the water level sensor in the water bottle could have
caused the engine coolant light to come on.  still .. the joys of electronic
systems in cars!

>I have been trying to solve problems with my check engine light this
> entire summer.    I have a 1996 E 320 with 150,000 miles on it.  I
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> him it's the car.  Is anyone aware of special problems with the E
> 320?  Any advice for me?
Lee - 14 Aug 2005 21:26 GMT
The two sensors are wires together in series and each sensor has a different
resistance when switching. The instrument cluster uses a logic gate to
translate the resistance in the wire as to which sensor has switched. If a
sensor fails, the cluster gets confused and puts on the most important
warning light. Simple.

> I have a 96 e230 with 160,000 miles on.  I had a problem earlier this year
> with the coolant level light coming on.  The level of coolant was ok and
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>> him it's the car.  Is anyone aware of special problems with the E
>> 320?  Any advice for me?
Martin Joseph - 15 Aug 2005 07:50 GMT
> The two sensors are wires together in series and each sensor has a
> different resistance when switching. The instrument cluster uses a
> logic gate to translate the resistance in the wire as to which sensor
> has switched. If a sensor fails, the cluster gets confused and puts on
> the most important warning light. Simple.

Yes, simple but a terrible design.
Alan - 16 Aug 2005 09:32 GMT
I would have expected something far more complex than this!.  Thanks for the
info, at least I now understand the probelm.

>> The two sensors are wires together in series and each sensor has a
>> different resistance when switching. The instrument cluster uses a logic
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Yes, simple but a terrible design.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.