Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Mercedes-Benz Cars / September 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

1992 300D transmission questions...

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Pete Stephenson - 14 Sep 2005 22:29 GMT
Hey all, I've noticed a few things about the 300D I just bought that I'd
like to ask about to see if they're normal or not:

1) I occasionally hear an intermittent "ticking" noise that seems to be
coming from under the rear seat area. It appears to increase and
decrease in frequency with the rate of speed. (i.e. the faster the car
is going, the faster the ticking is). It comes and goes without any
directly attributable cause.

2) Occasionally "sharp" shifting. The transmission seems to always want
to shift at precisely the points when I'm letting off the gas pedal for
various reasons. This tends to cause particularly sharp shifts, as I
think the transmission is getting confused by my letting off the gas
right as it shifts. Assuming the vehicle starts out in first gear, then
shifts to second, then to third, and so on, the shift from second to
third is usually sharper while first-to-second and third-to-fourth is
quite smooth. Again, this isn't consistent, and the car usually shifts
smoothly between all gears with no problem. Also note that I spent the
last two years driving a CVT-transmission-equipped Honda, so I didn't
even have to deal with any shifting, so I might just be more sensitive
to it.

I had a mechanic examine and test-drive the vehicle before I purchased
it, and they gave it a clean bill of health, so I'm not terribly
worried. Still, as I'm not fully certain of what "normal" is on the car,
and since it has 198k miles, I'd like to confirm that everything's
working normally and that there's no problems.

Signature

Pete Stephenson
HeyPete.com

T.G. Lambach - 15 Sep 2005 02:51 GMT
Occasionally "sharp" shifting.

Normal, these hydraulic transmissions shift more firmly than the new electronic boxes and certainly more firmly than a CVT variable ratio transmission.
Look for a vacuum leak when ALL the shifts snap your neck!

I occasionally hear an intermittent "ticking" noise that seems to be
coming from under the rear seat area.

I'd suspect a rear axle CV joint after inspecting both rear tires to exclude them. The car's miles point me to that suspicion. Axles can be bought remanufactured, if that's the problem.
Pete Stephenson - 15 Sep 2005 03:15 GMT
> Normal, these hydraulic transmissions shift more firmly than the new
> electronic boxes and certainly more firmly than a CVT variable ratio
> transmission.

Hmm. All right. It just seemed a bit unusual. They mostly seem to
happen at relatively low rates of speed (<30mph) with mild
acceleration.

Hopefully it's not a problem. No metallic noises are heard, just a firm
shift. I'm spoiled by the CVT. :)

> Look for a vacuum leak when ALL the shifts snap your neck!

Will do.

> >I occasionally hear an intermittent "ticking" noise that seems to be
> >coming from under the rear seat area.
>
> I'd suspect a rear axle CV joint after inspecting both rear tires to
> exclude them. The car's miles point me to that suspicion. Axles can
> be bought remanufactured, if that's the problem.

The tires and rims are essentially brand-new, with less than a thousand
miles on them. I'll look at the CV joints, but I doubt I'd know what to
do with one of them. The mechanic notes that the boots and everything
are secured properly. It's difficult to isolate the sound from inside
the vehicle, but it sounds as if it may be located more centerline than
off near one of the wheels (and do the rear wheels even have CV joints,
as they aren't really designed to turn like the front wheels?). Again,
the problem is intermittent.

Oh, I also got to experience my first hill-climbing excursion with the
turbodiesel today. I have no doubt it can climb nearly any hill on this
continent with a road on it, but it sure as heck won't climb them
quickly. Acceleration on a modest grade is quite lacking, even with a
turbo and operating about 50 feet above sea level (I could see the ocean
from the road). Not a major problem, as I don't climb many hills, but it
was nice to see the effects of slopes on the speed of the vehicle.

Signature

Pete Stephenson
HeyPete.com

T.G. Lambach - 15 Sep 2005 05:00 GMT
CV joints give a lot of warning before failure so just drive it.

A diesel is essentially a constant speed engine (thus its economy) so
you see why one needs to charge hills at their bottom or be in the truck
lane for their duration!
Pete Stephenson - 15 Sep 2005 05:06 GMT
> CV joints give a lot of warning before failure so just drive it.

What sort of warning should I be on the lookout for, just in case? I
hear that they're very over-engineered and require practically no
maintenance.

> A diesel is essentially a constant speed engine (thus its economy) so
> you see why one needs to charge hills at their bottom or be in the truck
> lane for their duration!

Indeed.

Signature

Pete Stephenson
HeyPete.com

Chas Hurst - 15 Sep 2005 05:26 GMT
> > A diesel is essentially a constant speed engine (thus its economy) so
> > you see why one needs to charge hills at their bottom or be in the truck
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Pete Stephenson
> HeyPete.com

Indeed not. A truck engine or stationary engine is a constant speed engine.
A Benz diesel car engine has a wide rpm range and a significent spread
between maximum torque and maximum power.

Chas Hurst
T.G. Lambach - 15 Sep 2005 07:24 GMT
The warning will be boring - just slightly more noise, eventually a CV
joint will start clunking. That's when you must take it for repair.
Dano - 15 Sep 2005 21:09 GMT
I may have had to charge hills in my 79 300D but never in my 95 E300D.
Geoff Miller - 21 Sep 2005 22:25 GMT
> I may have had to charge hills in my 79 300D but never in my 95 E300D.

Nor I in my '91 300D 2.5.  I was really surprised at how much power
the car had when I test-drove it, compared to my turbo W123s.  it's
kind of neat having an oddball (for California) model, too.

Geoff

Signature

"Am I crazy, or is it hot in here?" -- Charles Manson

Pete Stephenson - 23 Sep 2005 00:50 GMT
> Nor I in my '91 300D 2.5.  I was really surprised at how much power
> the car had when I test-drove it, compared to my turbo W123s.  it's
> kind of neat having an oddball (for California) model, too.

Ah, I seem to have determined the problem with the hard shifting. It was
related to me having problems retracting the rear headrests.

It seems that I bumped some of the vacuum lines around, and had
reconnected them improperly. As the engine communicates with the
transmission via vacuum, it wasn't able to communicate properly, and the
shifting was very hard. I've since re-connected them in the proper
manner, and it now shifts smoothly, consistently, and properly.

Signature

Pete Stephenson
HeyPete.com

Geoff Miller - 23 Sep 2005 15:33 GMT
> Ah, I seem to have determined the problem with the hard shifting.
> It was related to me having problems retracting the rear headrests.

I can understand how inadvertently disconnecting a vacuum line
might cause hard shifting, since I've had a similar experience
(an inattentive mechanic knocked a vacuum line loose while
opening the air cleaner housing).  But where exactly do the
rear headrests enter into it?

Geoff

Signature

"Am I crazy, or is it hot in here?" -- Charles Manson

Pete Stephenson - 23 Sep 2005 15:40 GMT
> I can understand how inadvertently disconnecting a vacuum line
> might cause hard shifting, since I've had a similar experience
> (an inattentive mechanic knocked a vacuum line loose while
> opening the air cleaner housing).  But where exactly do the
> rear headrests enter into it?

The rear headrests are also vacuum-operated.

Specifically, they lock in the upwards position, but a vacuum "signal"
is needed to release them back to their stowed position.

By dislodging several vacuum tubes and mis-connecting them, this had the
dual consequences of hard shifting and inoperative rear headrests.

Signature

Pete Stephenson
HeyPete.com

Geoff Miller - 23 Sep 2005 17:53 GMT
> The rear headrests are also vacuum-operated.

Ah, I didn't know that.  I'd had the impression that they were
released electrically.  I guess that explains the delay in
their dropping when I press the switch.  Never gave it much
thought.

Geoff

Signature

"Am I crazy, or is it hot in here?" -- Charles Manson

Pete Stephenson - 24 Sep 2005 01:58 GMT
> Ah, I didn't know that.  I'd had the impression that they were
> released electrically.  I guess that explains the delay in
> their dropping when I press the switch.  Never gave it much
> thought.

I never knew that either...just discovered it here the other day on this
newsgroup, remembered that I goofed up the lines, and put two and two
together.

Signature

Pete Stephenson
HeyPete.com

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.