Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Mercedes-Benz Cars / January 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ML320 1998 Catalytic converter

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
ian@jardine.net - 10 Jan 2006 21:12 GMT
My ML320 was purchased in Feb 1998 and has 85K on the clock.

The LHS cat has developed a "death rattle" and a specialist MB repair
garage (not a dealership) recoomends replacing BOTH (matching pair
works better) and using MB equipment because the computerized senors
are ultra sensitive. Cost $1,100.00 EACH.  I have seen many CC for the
ML320 advewrtized for around $355.00 each on the web.

ANyone know what the story is here as the price difference is HUGE.
Better still anyone know a high quality cat supplier?

ANd Yes I am beginning a chat to MB we being just o/s warranty.....But
don't extect a happy ending there.
Peter W Peternouschek - 11 Jan 2006 03:16 GMT
Of course he wants to use the best and most expensive...He makes more money
that way....O2 sensors are O2 sensors MB uses Bosch. No big deal there.
I used after market cats on a 92 Corvette and they worked fine and the fit
was correct. I got these from an outfit in Texas. I believe they were called
discountconverter or something like that. I would go with the after market
replacements and have a good mufflershop install them in case any tweaking
needs to be done.

Peter

> My ML320 was purchased in Feb 1998 and has 85K on the clock.
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> ANd Yes I am beginning a chat to MB we being just o/s warranty.....But
> don't extect a happy ending there.
Dori A Schmetterling - 11 Jan 2006 10:48 GMT
How do you know the very cheap ones aren't counterfeit?

Loads of dangerous junk parts about.

DAS

For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
---

> Of course he wants to use the best and most expensive...He makes more
> money
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>> ANd Yes I am beginning a chat to MB we being just o/s warranty.....But
>> don't extect a happy ending there.
Martin Joseph - 11 Jan 2006 18:35 GMT
> How do you know the very cheap ones aren't counterfeit?
>
> Loads of dangerous junk parts about.

This is pure FUD.  There are many fine aftermarket replacements
available.  You would never get a "counterfeit" unless you want MB
original.  No one counterfeits aftermarket parts as they aren't as over
priced.

Find a good local exhaust shop (ie not midas) and let them handle it.

Marty
Dori A Schmetterling - 11 Jan 2006 20:29 GMT
In that sense I am inclined to agree with you but I still wonder why a
non-MB part should be so much cheaper.  We're not talking 25% here.

The costs (material ands labour) can't be that dissimilar, can they?

(Any replies besides "MB/Bosch are ripping us off" welcome...)

DAS
Signature

For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
---

[...]

> This is pure FUD.  There are many fine aftermarket replacements available.
> You would never get a "counterfeit" unless you want MB original.  No one
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Marty
ian@jardine.net - 11 Jan 2006 15:09 GMT
Thanks for the reply Peter,

Unfortunately OBD2 came in around 1996. B4 that aftermarket Cats seems
to work perfectly and have no problems passing the State emission
tests. However, after 1996 "most" aftermarket CATS seem to quickly give
"errror" message on a car's internal computer. The emission test PCs
plug straight into the car computers and download all the "error"
messages. Any such messages relating to the CAT mean an instant test
FAILURE. Doesn't matter how clean the actual emmisions are out of the
car's tail pipe, it's the computer "error" messages which count!

DAS,

Yes in any aftermarket equipment there are good and not so good
suppliers. There are a number of well known reputable CAT suppliers and
their equipment is probably as good as ANY MB piece of equipment in
quality standard. Problem is MB/Bosch seems to be hiding some "secret"
re the way the sensors work which increases the propensity of receiving
"incorrect" error messages.

What I am seeking is the knoweldge base of people here. Does anyone
have real in depth experience of this issue and any particular
recommendations re supplier.

The garage I use I have knwon for more than 15 years and I do not
believe they are deliberately taking me for a ride. They tell me that
their experience of CATS in cars after 1996 means they get too many
"error" messages down the road which can only be erradicated by using
the original MB equipment. As I say I am looking for input from people
who perhaps have found a better solution from a supplier which can
certify CATS for post 1996 OBD2 compatibility.
Thanks.
Peter W Peternouschek - 11 Jan 2006 22:01 GMT
Come on guys this is not really a black art......After market converters
should be fine if they are made to the correct specification and are not
some generic undersize bolton..
Specific trouble codes for Cat performance are identified by trouble codes
P0420 to P0434.
No mystery here...if the cat performance is out of spec and is not working
correctly it should set a trouble code.
This supplier is not the least expensive but they deal in all MB parts.
For a 49 state cat   they want $525. for a Cal cat they want  $595.
I have had good luck bying from them. They also have a very nice catalog
with part numbers & pictures  for varuious MBz

PerformanceProducts4Benz.com

Peter

> Thanks for the reply Peter,
>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> certify CATS for post 1996 OBD2 compatibility.
> Thanks.
Peter W Peternouschek - 11 Jan 2006 22:04 GMT
Sorry..here is the correct URL

www.performanceproducts4benz.com

> Come on guys this is not really a black art......After market converters
> should be fine if they are made to the correct specification and are not
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
> > certify CATS for post 1996 OBD2 compatibility.
> > Thanks.
ian@jardine.net - 12 Jan 2006 00:09 GMT
Interesting website.
But I see no mention of catalytic converters?
Peter W Peternouschek - 12 Jan 2006 17:52 GMT
http://www.performanceproducts4benz.com/productpage.aspx?pid=101398&name=Cat
alytic+Converter
> Interesting website.
> But I see no mention of catalytic converters?
Lee - 11 Jan 2006 21:12 GMT
A mate of mine has a CLK320 (208). His cats failed July last year. Didn't
like the price of MB replacements so fitted some after-market ones. Since
October his car's been in my workshop 4 times to have to Engine light turned
off. Each time for a cat related fault. When I inspected his cheap n
cheerful cats, they were half the size of MB ones. Told him to get the MB
ones. So he's actually spent more!!!! Never seen a modern MB run right with
cheap cats/exhaust systems.

> My ML320 was purchased in Feb 1998 and has 85K on the clock.
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> ANd Yes I am beginning a chat to MB we being just o/s warranty.....But
> don't extect a happy ending there.
ian@jardine.net - 11 Jan 2006 21:43 GMT
Yep, that's the concern.
The manufacturer CATS are absolutely huge in length so getting a small
piece and  hoping for the best is NOT a good diea. I am just surprised
that no solid after market manufacturer hasn't come up with the goods
yet. At least I can't find one....yet.
Dori A Schmetterling - 12 Jan 2006 20:39 GMT
Obviously the ones available in America are just as good even though they
cost half or less.  Voodoo economics?  Cheap illegal labour?  Hand-made
under contract in the back street of a Chinese suburb?

DAS

For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
---

>A mate of mine has a CLK320 (208). His cats failed July last year. Didn't
>like the price of MB replacements so fitted some after-market ones. Since
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>> ANd Yes I am beginning a chat to MB we being just o/s warranty.....But
>> don't extect a happy ending there.
ian@jardine.net - 18 Jan 2006 18:40 GMT
Well here is an update:

I had the ML "in" for the Harmonic Balancer (it was replaced) and the
MB service people agreed the LHS CAT is a "gonner".
My research shows me that 1999-2001 CATs are subject to mandatory MB
inspection related to a "leak" I think it's campaign no: 2005060014
September 2005. 79,119 vehicles affected.

Hmm this leaves 1998 owners (like myself) out in the cold (Warranty is
8 years or 80K miles and I am 85K).
What surprises me is that the 1998 CATS must be different from the 1999
onwards (or they would be subject to the before mentioned
inspection/recall). So why is my 1998 CAT in such demand that it is
back ordered from Germany with expected one month delay? Is there a
problem with the 1998 CATs that MB has not yet acknowledged?

Anyone else with a similar problem?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.