Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Mercedes-Benz Cars / May 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

126 MPH Jaunt Leads to Jail: Man Gets 12 Days for Sprint on GW Parkway

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Mike - 12 May 2006 15:40 GMT
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/11/AR200...

126 MPH Jaunt Leads to Jail: Man Gets 12 Days for Sprint on GW Parkway

By Jerry Markon
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, May 12, 2006; B01

A Georgetown University law student who was trying to impress his
girlfriend admitted yesterday that he cranked up his new Infiniti to
126 mph on the George Washington Memorial Parkway -- among the highest
speeds ever clocked on the stretch of federal road.

Drew Hoffman, 28, pleaded guilty to one count of reckless endangerment,
a misdemeanor, in U.S. District Court in Alexandria, and for this he
will spend 12 days in jail and a year on probation. His attorney, Jim
Clark, said Hoffman "had a new car for the first time in his life, and
a great stretch of road at 4 a.m., with no one on it. . . . To say that
he is remorseful is a gross understatement."

In a brief interview afterward, Hoffman, an Oklahoma native who lives
in the District, said his early morning cruise was "a complete lack of
judgment. There is no other explanation."

Sgt. Scott Fear, a U.S. Park Police spokesman, said Hoffman was stopped
at 3:55 a.m. on March 12 traveling south on the parkway at Turkey Run
Park. He said Hoffman quickly pulled onto a ramp but wound up trapped
because the ramp led to CIA headquarters.

"It appeared he was trying to lose the officer real quick," Fear said.
"The officer just kind of smiled, knew he couldn't go anywhere and
pulled up and got him." Hoffman was arrested and taken to a Park Police
station before being released. His girlfriend, who had been a
passenger, drove the silver 2006 Infiniti G35 back to the police
station.

Prosecutors said in court that they could not recall anyone going
faster than 126 mph on the parkway, and U.S. Magistrate Judge Barry R.
Poretz told Hoffman: "In 15 years on the bench, having adjudicated
literally thousands and thousands of speeding cases, this is the
highest that I've ever had."

Law enforcement officials said later that two motorcycles were clocked
last year going 160 mph on the parkway but were never caught. A third
motorcyclist going 110 was charged and sentenced to 15 days in jail.

While speeds of more than 100 mph on the parkway are exceedingly rare,
officials said they are detecting increasing speeds on highways across
the Washington area. That echoes national trends, which have shown
higher rates of speed since Congress repealed the national maximum
speed limit of 55 in 1995. Since then, 31 states have raised their
speed limits to 70 mph or higher, according to the Arlington-based
Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. "I think it's more acceptable
now to go fast because speed limits are up, we don't see them being
enforced as aggressively on highways and we see cars being advertised
as having 400 horsepower," said Adrian Lund, the institute's president.
"This is sending a message to people who are interested in speeding
that maybe it's okay."

Law enforcement officials, hoping to send a message to the public to
slow down, were quick to condemn Hoffman for exceeding the 50 mph speed
limit by more than 75 mph. "His actions were dumb and dangerous," said
Chuck Rosenberg, the U.S. attorney in Alexandria. "People die on our
roads all the time. We certainly don't need folks hitting 126 mph just
to see what their cars can do."

Fear said Hoffman's speed was particularly excessive on the parkway,
which winds along the Potomac River with speed limits that range from
25 to 50 mph. "It's a scenic parkway. It wasn't designed to be a
superhighway," he said.

Hoffman, wearing a gray business suit with a blue tie, stood before
Poretz with his head bowed yesterday and said: "I know I made a
mistake. I hope you can see based on my past record that it won't
happen again."

The judge fined him $1,200 and said he could not drive a car for the
first 60 days of his probation and only on a restricted basis after
that. The 12 days in jail could be served on weekends.

"This was an absolute lack of judgment," Poretz said. "You could have
killed yourself. You could have killed the other person in the car. You
could have killed someone else."

Hoffman wound up in federal court because the 23.5 mile stretch of
parkway from Mount Vernon to McLean -- except the part in the city of
Alexandria -- is federal land. Fear said Park Police wrote more than
7,000 citations on the parkway last year and that the numbers are
rising this year.

The conviction should not affect Hoffman's eligibility to be a lawyer.
Asked if he learned anything that would help his legal career, Hoffman
said it would enable him to sympathize with clients "who demonstrate
that this is out of character."
cp - 14 May 2006 01:35 GMT
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/11/AR200...
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> 126 mph on the George Washington Memorial Parkway -- among the highest
> speeds ever clocked on the stretch of federal road.

126mph? That's news? A Mazda Protegé will do that.  <snore> zzzzzzz....zzzzzzzzz.....zzzzzzzz......

cp
James O'Riley - 14 May 2006 06:12 GMT
>> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/11/AR200...
>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> cp

So would my old 1988 Porsche 911.  ;-)
Dave HD - 15 May 2006 05:48 GMT
Yeah, and my 1997 Ford Explorer will still hit 115+ with over 109,000 miles
on it!!

Davehd

>>> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/11/AR200...
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>>
> So would my old 1988 Porsche 911.  ;-)
cp - 16 May 2006 03:43 GMT
> Yeah, and my 1997 Ford Explorer will still hit 115+ with over 109,000 miles

109K miles? Barely broken in.

cp.
Richard Sexton - 16 May 2006 12:49 GMT
>> Yeah, and my 1997 Ford Explorer will still hit 115+ with over 109,000 miles
>
>109K miles? Barely broken in.

Uh huh. The last Ford I had  required a new engine
and $5000 worth of rust repair at that milage.

Signature

  Need Mercedes parts?   http://parts.mbz.org
Richard Sexton       | Mercedes stuff: http://mbz.org
1970 280SE, 72 280SE | Home pages: http://rs79.vrx.net
633CSi 250SE/C 300SD | http://aquaria.net http://killi.net

James O'Riley - 16 May 2006 15:42 GMT
>>> Yeah, and my 1997 Ford Explorer will still hit 115+ with over 109,000 miles
>> 109K miles? Barely broken in.
>
> Uh huh. The last Ford I had  required a new engine
> and $5000 worth of rust repair at that milage.

We got the engine replaced in our Subaru Outback at 50K miles because of
piston slap.  They use short skirt pistons to make the gas mileage look
better; it doesn't get any better mileage than any MB we've owned!
cp - 17 May 2006 01:29 GMT
>>109K miles? Barely broken in.
>
> Uh huh. The last Ford I had  required a new engine
> and $5000 worth of rust repair at that milage.

hmmmmm ok 109K for a Ford IS impressive. At least for American Fords. The two German Fords we've had were quite good cars and
they're not (or were not) generally known to be the best cars there either.

cp
Dave HD - 17 May 2006 19:18 GMT
Actually just turned 110k this morning.

Davehd

>>>109K miles? Barely broken in.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> cp
cp - 18 May 2006 07:12 GMT
> Actually just turned 110k this morning.

And it's still running?? =)

My friend's father's Chevy truck made it past 650,000 MILES on the original engine, now THAT is impressive, but then with a huge v8
engine it has no excuse but to be robust and last a long time

cp
Dave HD - 19 May 2006 07:11 GMT
It has an SOHC V6 and is still running quite strong.

Davehd

>> Actually just turned 110k this morning.
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> cp
cp - 19 May 2006 07:33 GMT
At 110K miles it has no excuse not to, it's basically broken in, at least by Mercedes standards (of yesteryear perhaps), this being
a Mercedes group.

cp

> It has an SOHC V6 and is still running quite strong.
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>>
>> cp
Dave HD - 23 May 2006 01:33 GMT
My Merc ('98 C230) has 109,000.  I agree on both counts!!  ;-)

Davehd

> At 110K miles it has no excuse not to, it's basically broken in, at least
> by Mercedes standards (of yesteryear perhaps), this being a Mercedes
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>>>
>>> cp
Dave HD - 17 May 2006 19:17 GMT
Can't imagine why.  My truck's been parked in the driveway everyday since I
bought it without any shelter, and I am just beginning to see a couple of
small areas that might need some attention.  I also live in the "Rust Belt"
where they salt everything.

Davehd

>>> Yeah, and my 1997 Ford Explorer will still hit 115+ with over 109,000
>>> miles
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Uh huh. The last Ford I had  required a new engine
> and $5000 worth of rust repair at that milage.
sir krustin - 20 May 2006 23:10 GMT
>> Yeah, and my 1997 Ford Explorer will still hit 115+ with over 109,000
>> miles
>
> 109K miles? Barely broken in.

By Japanese standards, it is worn out.

In Japan (which has the strictest e-test requirements in the world), motors
generally fail at 50,000kms and need to be replaced.
James O'Riley - 21 May 2006 01:16 GMT
>>> Yeah, and my 1997 Ford Explorer will still hit 115+ with over 109,000
>>> miles
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> In Japan (which has the strictest e-test requirements in the world), motors
> generally fail at 50,000kms and need to be replaced.

Hmmm...that's about the time my Subaru started really clanging due to
piston slap caused by short skirts to make gas mileage look good.  ;-)
cp - 21 May 2006 08:15 GMT
> In Japan (which has the strictest e-test requirements in the world), motors
> generally fail at 50,000kms and need to be replaced.

Must be a inbuilt design, apparently they want people to go through a car every couple of years.

cp
James O'Riley - 21 May 2006 09:05 GMT
>> In Japan (which has the strictest e-test requirements in the world), motors
>> generally fail at 50,000kms and need to be replaced.
>
> Must be a inbuilt design, apparently they want people to go through a car every couple of years.
>
> cp

Well, that's one way to insure they stay in business, as as Barnum, the
carnival owner once said, "There's one born every minute." (A fool that
will buy tickets to my carnival.)

I really don't know how GOOD companies stay in business.  I had a
General Electric uwave oven that lasted from 1976-2006.  Of course I
bought another last month when the old one went out.  But the folks that
built that original oven are probably dead and gone so it did them no
good that I was a repeat customer.

Point to ponder?  Not really.  ;-)
cp - 22 May 2006 00:19 GMT
I guess it's a case of built in obsolesence.

But the people I know who've lived in Japan say that it is strongly encouraged for people to recycle their cars every couple of
years, perhaps they need the metal.

cp

> Well, that's one way to insure they stay in business, as as Barnum, the carnival owner once said, "There's one born every minute."
> (A fool that will buy tickets to my carnival.)
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Point to ponder?  Not really.  ;-)
Dave HD - 23 May 2006 01:35 GMT
Uh, let's keep in mind that the truck weighs in at over 4,200 pounds.  115
mph is a LOT to be pushing 4200 pounds to!!  Especially with the aerodynamic
coefficient of a barn door!

Davehd

>>> Yeah, and my 1997 Ford Explorer will still hit 115+ with over 109,000
>>> miles
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> motors
> generally fail at 50,000kms and need to be replaced.
cp - 16 May 2006 03:09 GMT
> So would my old 1988 Porsche 911.  ;-)

What's wrong with it, engine is dying?

cp
James O'Riley - 16 May 2006 03:44 GMT
>> So would my old 1988 Porsche 911.  ;-)
>
> What's wrong with it, engine is dying?
>
> cp

Nope, driver scared due to cross winds.  ;-)
cp - 16 May 2006 04:11 GMT
>>> So would my old 1988 Porsche 911.  ;-)
>>
>> What's wrong with it, engine is dying?
> Nope, driver scared due to cross winds.  ;-)

Well, something is definitely not right; 126mph in a Porsche is an embarrassment, unless done in bumper to bumper traffic =)

cp
Kenneth P. Stox - 16 May 2006 05:11 GMT
> Well, something is definitely not right; 126mph in a Porsche is an embarrassment, unless done in bumper to bumper traffic =)

Depends, 126mph in a 356 would be pretty impressive.
cp - 16 May 2006 07:44 GMT
>> Well, something is definitely not right; 126mph in a Porsche is an embarrassment, unless done in bumper to bumper traffic =)
>
> Depends, 126mph in a 356 would be pretty impressive.

<choke> <choke> =))

cp
SW - 21 May 2006 02:47 GMT
Holy Craps, 126 in South California would make him a hero on the freeway.
Its either 126 or stopped dead here.

> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/11/AR200...
>
[quoted text clipped - 90 lines]
> said it would enable him to sympathize with clients "who demonstrate
> that this is out of character."
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.