Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / MINI / October 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

gear oil

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Ben Boyle - 12 Oct 2004 01:50 GMT
I am the new owner of a '72 Mini Clubman. I have been told that the engine and the transmission both use the same oil
out of the same sump. Is this true, or do I have put oil into the transmission seperately elsewhere? It is a regular 4
speed car. You can either e-mail the responses or just post here.
Thanks
iBuyMinis.Us - 12 Oct 2004 02:14 GMT
Hi:

It's better to post here as the responses are archived so noobys after you
can benefit form your work.

Yes the Mini (this is assuming it has the original A series and not VTEC,
Vauxhall transplant) shares the same oil with the engine and transmission.

Depending on where you are in the world you can sort of play with your
viscosity but I use Synthetic 20W50 here in SoCal. One of the key benefits
is the fact that you prolong the life of your powerunit because you change
the oil together. The only negative in my opinion is that the oil gets
thrashed sooner because of the gears in the transmission.

Good luck and post a link so we can see pictures of your new car. You can
see mine here http://austinmini.ositech.net
Signature

http://iBuyMinis.OsiTech.Net
-----------------------------------------------
Wanted Austin Mini Projects.
In any condition and in the USA.
What do you have hiding in your shed?

>I am the new owner of a '72 Mini Clubman. I have been told that the engine
>and the transmission both use the same oil
> out of the same sump. Is this true, or do I have put oil into the
> transmission seperately elsewhere? It is a regular 4
> speed car. You can either e-mail the responses or just post here.
> Thanks
Rocky Frisco - 12 Oct 2004 08:19 GMT
> I am the new owner of a '72 Mini Clubman. I have been told that the engine and the transmission both use the same oil
> out of the same sump. Is this true, or do I have put oil into the transmission seperately elsewhere? It is a regular 4
> speed car. You can either e-mail the responses or just post here.

Ben, it's true, the car uses one common sump for engine, transmission
and final drive. The only problem this introduces is that the
transmission and final drive introduce swarf (steel shavings and such)
into the lubrication system of the engine. Many Mini owners use a
special sump drain plug that has a strong magnet on the end of the
plug to capture the steel shavings before they can damage the bearings
and oil pump. I use one of these myself.

The Mini is a miraculous automobile; take proper care of it and it can
provide the most fun you've ever had driving a car.

-Rock    http://www.rocky-frisco.com
--
Rocky Frisco's LIBERTY website: http://www.liberty-in-our-time.com/
World's best free News Service: http://www.rationalreview.com/news/
David Toft - 12 Oct 2004 09:26 GMT
>> I am the new owner of a '72 Mini Clubman. I have been told that the
>>engine and the transmission both use the same oil
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>to capture the steel shavings before they can damage the bearings and
>oil pump. I use one of these myself.

The magnetic drain plug was a factory fitting. In the days before they
put synchromesh on first gear you could find some frightenly  large
lumps of gear tooth stuck to it.
Signature

David Toft

The Muffin Man - 12 Oct 2004 17:20 GMT
You can also bung a magnet on the oil filter.  A hard drive magnet works
well :)

The Muffin Man

>> I am the new owner of a '72 Mini Clubman. I have been told that the
>> engine and the transmission both use the same oil
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> Rocky Frisco's LIBERTY website: http://www.liberty-in-our-time.com/
> World's best free News Service: http://www.rationalreview.com/news/
Ryan Shaw - 12 Oct 2004 22:03 GMT
or you can just buy a premium oil filter from rover - costs like 50p more
and has a magent inside - tight b*stard
> You can also bung a magnet on the oil filter.  A hard drive magnet works
> well :)
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>> Rocky Frisco's LIBERTY website: http://www.liberty-in-our-time.com/
>> World's best free News Service: http://www.rationalreview.com/news/
The Muffin Man - 13 Oct 2004 00:47 GMT
Didn't know that you could get a "rich bug%er" oil filter otherwise I would
have advised it :D

The Muffin Man

> or you can just buy a premium oil filter from rover - costs like 50p more
> and has a magent inside - tight b*stard
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>>> Rocky Frisco's LIBERTY website: http://www.liberty-in-our-time.com/
>>> World's best free News Service: http://www.rationalreview.com/news/
splam - 13 Oct 2004 09:13 GMT
> Didn't know that you could get a "rich bug%er" oil filter otherwise I
> would have advised it :D
>
> The Muffin Man

I use a FRAM filter on my Mini, but it's not the one they list, it's about
1.5-2 inches deeper if anyones interested I'll crane my head under the
grill and read the part number - I think it's something like 2528 or 2825.

S.
Tim - 13 Oct 2004 10:27 GMT
you going to the Nats Splam?

>> Didn't know that you could get a "rich bug%er" oil filter otherwise I
>> would have advised it :D
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> S.
splam - 14 Oct 2004 09:10 GMT
> you going to the Nats Splam?

Nah, car still in too many bits :)
iBuyMinis.Us - 13 Oct 2004 15:49 GMT
IMHO, the worst thing you can do to your car is use Fram oil filter.

I use Ford filter. Do yourself a favor and cut open a both filters and see
the innards.

Signature

http://iBuyMinis.OsiTech.Net
-----------------------------------------------
Wanted Austin Mini Projects.
In any condition and in the USA.
What do you have hiding in your shed?

>> Didn't know that you could get a "rich bug%er" oil filter otherwise I
>> would have advised it :D
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> S.
splam - 14 Oct 2004 10:20 GMT
> IMHO, the worst thing you can do to your car is use Fram oil filter.
>
> I use Ford filter. Do yourself a favor and cut open a both filters and
> see the innards.

The guy who supplied it to me uses them on race cars - can't be too bad.

As with oil changes, frequency of changes is possibly more important than
quality.
iBuyMinis.Us - 14 Oct 2004 15:18 GMT
I see, so possibly they are racing specials and not the crap ones they sell
in stores then.

I use Mobil1 synthetic.

Signature

http://iBuyMinis.OsiTech.Net
-----------------------------------------------
Wanted Austin Mini Projects.
In any condition and in the USA.
What do you have hiding in your shed?

>> IMHO, the worst thing you can do to your car is use Fram oil filter.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> As with oil changes, frequency of changes is possibly more important than
> quality.
Nicholas Bales - 15 Oct 2004 14:50 GMT
> I use Mobil1 synthetic.

You shouldn't.
iBuyMinis.Us - 15 Oct 2004 15:29 GMT
Okay, miniducate me as to why not.

Thanks and have a nice Friday.

Signature

http://iBuyMinis.OsiTech.Net
-----------------------------------------------
Wanted Austin Mini Projects.
In any condition and in the USA.
What do you have hiding in your shed?

>> I use Mobil1 synthetic.
>
> You shouldn't.
Rocky Frisco - 15 Oct 2004 17:07 GMT
> Okay, miniducate me as to why not.

Apparently the synthetics don't stand up well to being chewed up by
the gears in the transmission and final drive. Seems it's the wrong
sort of application for them. This is, by the way, what I have been told.

-Rock    http://www.rocky-frisco.com
--
Rocky Frisco's LIBERTY website: http://www.liberty-in-our-time.com/
World's best free News Service: http://www.rationalreview.com/news/
Ryan Shaw - 16 Oct 2004 01:04 GMT
year - t*sser - see my post on the same subject, dated - 12/10/04 10:47 -
like two posts below yours...

>> Okay, miniducate me as to why not.
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Rocky Frisco's LIBERTY website: http://www.liberty-in-our-time.com/
> World's best free News Service: http://www.rationalreview.com/news/
iBuyMinis.Us - 16 Oct 2004 03:44 GMT
Thanks Rocky Sir.

Now I am really confused. Don't motorbikes use basically the same set up as
we do in terms of sharing oil between trans and engine though?

Signature

http://iBuyMinis.OsiTech.Net
-----------------------------------------------
Wanted Austin Mini Projects.
In any condition and in the USA.
What do you have hiding in your shed?

>> Okay, miniducate me as to why not.
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Rocky Frisco's LIBERTY website: http://www.liberty-in-our-time.com/
> World's best free News Service: http://www.rationalreview.com/news/
Rocky Frisco - 16 Oct 2004 06:38 GMT
> Thanks Rocky Sir.
>
> Now I am really confused. Don't motorbikes use basically the same set up as
> we do in terms of sharing oil between trans and engine though?

I had the same thought. Don't know the answer.

-Rock    http://www.rocky-frisco.com
--
Rocky Frisco's LIBERTY website: http://www.liberty-in-our-time.com/
World's best free News Service: http://www.rationalreview.com/news/
drew - 16 Oct 2004 09:16 GMT
>> Thanks Rocky Sir.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> -Rock    http://www.rocky-frisco.com

This subject has been debated 'till the cows come home... I think it is
just 'the accepted wisdom' that you don't put fully synth in the A
series. I have heard a few reasons given; one is the reason already
mentioned about mashing in the gearbox, another is that the natural
rubber seals used in very old engines don't like to solvents in
synthetic oils, another would be that the viscosity of most fully synths
is too low and leaks past the seals, one other reason I have heard is
that the detergents in synthetic oils cleans all the sludge away from
sealing faces and make the engine leak.

What the truth is I really don't know, but there does appear to be a
theme which I have experienced... If you put a nice modern fully
synthetic oil in an old high mileage mini it leaks more oil. (been there
done that, found a couple of pints of Mobil 1 on my garage floor).

However, I also know of people that have built spangly new engines to
good tolerances with new seals throughout and used synthetics
exclusively for many thousands of miles with no problems.

The conclusion I draw would be this, stick to what is in it.

One thought to bear in mind when selecting an oil for your Mini, when
the Transverse A series was created mono-grade oils were still the
standard, indeed the owners handbook of my Elf recommends winter and
summer oils and 6 monthly changes. Multi-grades were very much in their
infancy so the el-cheapo 20-50 from Walmart is almost certainly better
that the oils the power unit was designed for.

just some ramblings...

Drew.
The Muffin Man - 16 Oct 2004 10:30 GMT
Motorbikes have very different gearboxes to an A-series.  Although they
share the oil in the same way apparently there is a lot less force involved
between contact surfaces.

Again, this is someone else's wisdom.  Dammit Jim, I'm a teacher not a
polymer specialist!!

The Muffin Man

>> Thanks Rocky Sir.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Rocky Frisco's LIBERTY website: http://www.liberty-in-our-time.com/
> World's best free News Service: http://www.rationalreview.com/news/
Nicholas Bales - 16 Oct 2004 12:16 GMT
> Motorbikes have very different gearboxes to an A-series.  Although they
> share the oil in the same way apparently there is a lot less force involved
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> The Muffin Man

There's also the point that synthetic is more expensive. Why put such
expensive oil into an engine designed in the 1950s when you won't get
the benefits. You still have to change the oil more frequently that in
another car.

I firmly beleive that the frequency of oil changes is more important
than the quality of the oil. It's better to put a reasonable brand oil
(Castrol GTX 15W50 for me) every 5000km than an expensive synthetic
every 15000km.
Graham W - 12 Oct 2004 08:54 GMT
> I am the new owner of a '72 Mini Clubman. I have been told that the engine and the transmission both use the same oil
> out of the same sump. Is this true, or do I have put oil into the transmission seperately elsewhere? It is a regular 4
> speed car.

Both the 4 speed manual and the 4 speed auto share a common sump for
motor and gearbox.

Use good quality oil (not necessarily seriously expensive oil, but not
no-name brand) and replace it and the filter very regularly. Ordinary
motors of the 1960s required shorter oil change intervals because of the
poorer oil and bearing technologies of the day anyway, but the Mini is
particularly tough on it's oil.
Ryan Shaw - 12 Oct 2004 10:47 GMT
i thought the full synthetic was no good for the gearbox (transmission), the
oil molecules are to thin and small, so when the oil does get mashed between
the gears, it looses its lubricating qualities very quickly.
moving onto the magnetic sump plug - these are standard - about 1 inch long,
but many companies are selling a longer - bout 3 inches - plug with a
stronger magnet.  the advantage of being longer/stronger  , means it puts
the magnet in a better position to catch more of the sh*t in the oil because
its in a better flow.  - a good idea next time you're changing to oil.
changing the oil - should be done every 5000, but better to do it every
3000.  this means less swarf in the oil for fewer miles.
cheers lads
----
Ryan Shaw

>> I am the new owner of a '72 Mini Clubman. I have been told that the
>> engine and the transmission both use the same oil
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> poorer oil and bearing technologies of the day anyway, but the Mini is
> particularly tough on it's oil.
Geoff - 17 Oct 2004 11:19 GMT
>i thought the full synthetic was no good for the gearbox (transmission),
>the oil molecules are to thin and small, so when the oil does get mashed
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> ----
> Ryan Shaw

I've got a recently rebuilt engine in my mini, and i'm keen to go to
synthetic oil but i'm still using 20w-50 mineral oil because all the stuff i
read about using synthetic oil here and on other mini forums still scares me
:)
amsoil has a lot of good info on synthetics on their website and from what i
can see, good synthetic oils have a stronger film than mineral oils, and
that the mashing in the gearbox will cause more damage to the viscosity
improvers in normal multigrade mineral oil than it will to synthetics.  then
in case people suggest synthetics are too thin, 50 grade synthetics (5w-50
or 10w-50) are easy to find.  They're supposed to give much better
lubrication and degrade less over time.  One guy i was reading about ran
synthetic oil in his car for 30000km (or miles?? can't remember) without
changing it then sent it off for analysis and it was still working
perfectly.
Most of the reasons knowledgeable mini people state about why not to use
synthetics in minis seem to be disputed by other knowledgeable mini people
so probably the only way to be sure is to try it.  It might cost a rebuild,
but then if it works like its claimed, then you're engine might last twice
as long so it will save you the cost of a rebuild...
Then theres the brands... people say to use redline or royal purple or
similar, and not to use mobil 1.  here in Oz, regular 20w-50 is around
$3-$6/litre for a 5L bottle, Mobil 1 (or most other common brands of
synthetic) around $10-$12/L and Redline/Royal Purple about $30/L so theres
BIG cost differences there.  I'm happy to pay $50 a bottle for 5L of good
oil, but $150 is a bit much really.
Ryan Shaw - 17 Oct 2004 13:07 GMT
there was a post on this a year or so ago...  and someone approached an oil
company - got the reply from them not to use syn. in a mini. obviously i
cant stop you trying it yourself - but take it from me - the oil company in
question stated not to use their expensive stuff and go for the cheaper
option - im happy with that.
cheers
(good luck with the next rebuild if you do try synthetic)

>>i thought the full synthetic was no good for the gearbox (transmission),
>>the oil molecules are to thin and small, so when the oil does get mashed
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
> BIG cost differences there.  I'm happy to pay $50 a bottle for 5L of good
> oil, but $150 is a bit much really.
Geoff - 17 Oct 2004 13:26 GMT
> there was a post on this a year or so ago...  and someone approached an
> oil company - got the reply from them not to use syn. in a mini. obviously
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> cheers
> (good luck with the next rebuild if you do try synthetic)

Below is a copy (from www.dsnclassics.co.uk) of that letter from castrol
(originally posted here by Steve from DSN).   Read it again.  It doesn't say
not to use synthetic oil, it says not to use low viscosity (eg 0w-30)
synthetic oil.  The oil they recommend at the end of the letter is a
synthetic oil.

Geoff

-----------------------
We have met some concern about the use of synthetic oils, in that they have
been attributed to causing low engine oil pressure when hot. We would like
to clarify the situation. To this end, we have contacted Castrol (UK) Ltd.
for their advice and this is their response:

Oil pressure is directly related to viscosity and it is therefore not the
difference between synthetic and non-synthetic oils that causes the
difference in pressure, more the fact that modern synthetic oils are of a
lower viscosity than the A series engine was originally designed for.

Modern, new generation, engines are being designed to run on lighter
viscosity oils to aid lubricant flow when cold and provide less viscous drag
when hot thereby aiding fuel economy. The lubrication system in older
engines is designed to cater for larger working clearances on crankshaft and
camshaft bearing journals, valve gear and other moving parts, plus oil
galleries will be larger and the oil pump will be of a suitable design to
pump oils of a heavier viscosity irrespective of their base oil type.

Synthetic oils are designed to give greater film strength and higher levels
of lubricity together with increased thermal stability and better resistance
to oxidation. They are also able to maintain their properties when used
under arduous or extreme conditions. These special properties also enable
lighter viscosity, energy efficient oils to be used whilst offering an
enhanced level of protection and performance.

Whilst the lower viscosity of some synthetic oils may lead to reduced oil
pressure, it does not necessarily mean reduced protection. However, owners
who are nervous of a reduction in pressure should consider using Castrol
Formula RS 10W-60 which will give rapid circulation when cold but will
retain a substantial viscosity when up to its full working temperature.

We would like to thank Castrol (UK) Ltd. for their kind assistance.
The Muffin Man - 17 Oct 2004 14:38 GMT
To put this into words I understand, you have said "it may cost you a
rebuild to change it or it may save you a rebuild to change it".

Here in God's country we have a saying - "if it aint broke don't fix it".

The Muffin Man

>>i thought the full synthetic was no good for the gearbox (transmission),
>>the oil molecules are to thin and small, so when the oil does get mashed
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
> BIG cost differences there.  I'm happy to pay $50 a bottle for 5L of good
> oil, but $150 is a bit much really.

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.