Nick!
> A programmable version would be very interesting. Why settle for 4
> presets for a given engine when you could design a custom curve.
Because there are lots of programmable ignition systems on the market
already, none of which are priced for the car-hobby market.
Programmable ignition is only of use to someone with access to a
dynamometer, otherwise there is no way of knowing whether a change is
making an improvement. I use a DTA engine management system on my
dyno, and it really is the cat's patoot for controlling ignition. But,
an optimized ignition map is only suitable for that particular engine
running under specific conditions. Engines used on the street under
variable conditions (temperature, altitude, humidity, fuel composition
etc) cannot use optimized maps, but require something generally suited
to average operating conditions.
The target market for the unit I'm working on is not the hard-core
engine tuner, but the large number of Miniacs that have worn out Lucas
point-type distributors. There are precious few people with the tools
and skills necessary to rebuild and recurve mechanical distributors so
this unit addresses that problem. It'll be a complete drop-in ready
distributor: if a Miniac has the skills to change a set of points,
they will have no difficulty installing this thing. There are enough
pre-programmed curves, 16, to suit just about any A series engine,
certainly more suitable than the one curve offered by the
off-the-shelf generic mechanical units.
> Maybe a version 2 with PC software and some kind of interface...
Now that'd be the cat's patoot, and I'd be right there at the head of
the line to play with it, but as I said, how many have a dyno to get
feedback? I think the ultimate would be to have a knock sensor for
limit detection... but how many of those could be sold? I always have
to remind myself that we're dealing with a 50 year-old engine design
(65 if you go back to the Stovebolt 6 where the A series was stolen
from ;-) so there's little point in trying to drag it up to 21st
century technology... he said while simultaniously working on an
8-port EFI 1330 ;-)
> Anyway, I think the best thing to do would be to get in touch with
> minispares or minisport to sell it.
I'll be sending Chris Harper (Minisport) the prototype when it comes
back from Leguna Seca.
Graham W - 29 Oct 2004 05:22 GMT
> Because there are lots of programmable ignition systems on the market
> already, none of which are priced for the car-hobby market.
> Programmable ignition is only of use to someone with access to a
> dynamometer, otherwise there is no way of knowing whether a change is
> making an improvement.
How difficult is it to include a knock sensor in your design so that
customers can choose the curve you recommend as closest to their engine
and then set it up a little bit advanced and let the knock sensor keep
the timing advanced as far as possible?
If not for the "replacement market", such a setup would be ideal for the
performance market whilst avoiding the need for extensive dyno tuning
and programming.
I used to have a 1275 (probably actually a 1310 or 1340, I never
measured it) running on LPG. In America you call LPG propane, though
it's got anything up to 50% butane in it here. Obviously the timing
requirements are quite different to petrol and they also vary with the
proportion of butane in your LPG this week.
As it was, I just ran a distributor with fairly limited total advance
and set the static advance fairly aggressively. I had a pretty high
compression ratio - it used to ping horribly on petrol before I
converted it - so that was enough to get me plenty of power. I adjusted
themixture with an oxygen sensor and a multimeter and it went far better
on straight LPG than it ever had on petrol.
There's not much market for distributors for LPG on an A series motor,
but it's an example of an extreme condition. If you can build something
which can be persuaded to deliver optimum timing on LPG, then it will
run right on just about anything!
Paul - 31 Oct 2004 09:30 GMT
Graham, what state is your car rego'd in, How do you find the total
economy of the LPG vs performance? Did you have any trouble finding a
suitable tank for the boot of a mini? Have you concidered
superchargeing?
Marcel, I recon you'd unload quite a few units in Oz we have a lot of
worn out mech dizzys in clubies over here.
Regards
Paul in NSW OZ.
Graham W - 31 Oct 2004 10:47 GMT
> Graham, what state is your car rego'd in,
The car was registered in Victoria. I did the local TAFE course in LPG
fitting and maintenance whilst I was studying engineering at uni and
converted the car just before the requirement for registered workshops
came in here in 1992.
> How do you find the total economy of the LPG vs performance?
I was struggling to get 200km out of a 24 litre petrol tank (under the
rear floor) in a 1275 auto Moke, so I looked into putting a second
petrol tank (in the left side pannier like most Mokes) in it and
replacing the SU.
When I realised I could convert the thing to run straight gas with a
decent size gas tank for about $500 of parts and a few days work, the
way ahead was clear.
> Did you have any trouble finding a suitable tank for the boot of a mini?
I fitted an 88 litre water capacity (70 litres LPG) tank across the load
area between the rear shockers. It had an obscene range. As a student,
during term time I sometimes went more than a month between fills. On
holidays I could afford to travel serious distances, paying about 2c/km.
> Have you concidered superchargeing?
I scarpped the car in 1996 shortly after I graduated and bought a 1990
Nissan Pulsar. That car has now done about 170,000km on LPG, paying the
conversion cost many times over. I borrow a trailer to carry lawnmowers
or bicycles. For the money saved, the inconvenience is trivial.
Nicholas Bales - 02 Nov 2004 17:03 GMT
> Nick!
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> making an improvement. I use a DTA engine management system on my
> dyno, and it really is the cat's patoot for controlling ignition.
A dyno isn't the only way to measure the power curve of an engine. There
are a couple of very clever software solutions out there that can do the
job with a 1/4 mile run, a laptop and a connection to the coil.
Measuring the acceleration of the car is the key.
I use PowerDyn, which is very reliable and gives an extremely good
approximation or power and torque output:
http://jcdperformance.free.fr/
(sorry, it's all in french, but there is an english page that explains
the basic principles).
A friend of mine is actually prototyping a simple programmable ignition
curve system. Basically what it is supposed to do is this:
- User enters 2 ignition advance curves
- Do a quick acceleration run with each curve, same gear, same variables
all around
- The box gets a signal from the coil, and records an engine
acceleration curve (time/rpm) for both runs
- a line of leds indicates for steps of say 500rpm which curve provides
the best acceleration
- Modify curve as required, and try again
The system is quite crude (no actual power plot), but it should work
well enough to compare two runs with different curve configurations. It
could also be used to compare the results with 2 carb needles for examples.