Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / MINI / January 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

brake master cylinder

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
guesstimator - 24 Jan 2005 21:37 GMT
HI!

Does anyone know what the differcne is between a diagonal split and a
front to back split brake master cylinder? can i fit a split MC to a
front to back with a servo and front brake disks?

cheers all!!
Nicholas Bales - 25 Jan 2005 09:18 GMT
> HI!
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> cheers all!!

The front/back system is usually with disks, whereas the diagonal split
is for drum brakes. The diameter of the cylinders is different and thus
the threads on the brake lines are also different to avoid mixing them up.

Anyway, if that's the modern servo (post 1989) you have, you need the
late-model horizontal MC that is attached to the servo.
(-AD-) - 25 Jan 2005 11:17 GMT
And Elvis was sitting next to Nicholas Bales in the spaceship, which I
thought was kinda weird, but then they turned to me and said:

> Anyway, if that's the modern servo (post 1989) you have, you need the
> late-model horizontal MC that is attached to the servo.

Speaking of horizontal master cylinders, does anyone know if it's
possible to transplant the horizontal type Metro m/c and servo to a
Mini?

The parts look almost identical to late-model Mini equipment with the
servo and horizontal m/c.  

Anyone done this?
splam - 26 Jan 2005 06:43 GMT
(-AD-) <sp4mtrap@hotmail.com> wrote in news:MPG.1c603b3c96f50df79896a9
@news.individual.net:

> And Elvis was sitting next to Nicholas Bales in the spaceship, which I
> thought was kinda weird, but then they turned to me and said:
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Anyone done this?

I haven't seen this, but I have seen a Wilwood (I think) horizontal type
system used on a race Mini and afaik that was a simple fit with *no*
bodging required. Will try to find the details.
s
(-AD-) - 26 Jan 2005 10:40 GMT
And Elvis was sitting next to splam in the spaceship, which I thought
was kinda weird, but then they turned to me and said:

> > Speaking of horizontal master cylinders, does anyone know if it's
> > possible to transplant the horizontal type Metro m/c and servo to a
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> system used on a race Mini and afaik that was a simple fit with *no*
> bodging required. Will try to find the details.

Thanks, I'd be grateful for anything you can find.
Kelley Mascher - 26 Jan 2005 00:08 GMT
The diagonal system was only used on the Mini for a little over a year
from 1977 to 8/1978. It was used on both disks and drums. The disks
were, of course, on the 1275GT with 12" wheels. I've been told that it
was a really bad idea especially on the disk system. When a wheel
cylinder would fail, braking would tend to spin the car. No personal
experience.

Is the system already plumbed for diagonal split? If not it's probably
not a good idea to switch to it. A servo cannot be used on diagonal
split systems. On the other hand a diagonal split master cylinder can
be used in a front-back system since it has the same bore as the early
non-UK front-rear systems (Canada and Ben-Lux countries).

Some data:

Diagonal Split Master cylinder bore 17.5mm Lockheed #LM12171
supercedes 4222-171 Rear wheel cylinder bore 12.7mm

Front-rear Master cylinder bore 19/18mm bore Lockheed #LM1215121
supercedes MAP5121 Rear wheel cylinder bore 19mm

Cheers,

Kelley

>> HI!
>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>Anyway, if that's the modern servo (post 1989) you have, you need the
>late-model horizontal MC that is attached to the servo.
Joe Bisflik - 25 Jan 2005 16:23 GMT
The difference between the Diagonal and a front/back configuration is the
way each applies pressure to the brakes.  A diagonal MC will have two
channels for lack of a better term,  When the brakes are applied, pressure
will be applied to the two channels, one channel will send praking pressure
to one front wheel and one back wheel.  the other channel will handle the
opposite wheels.  A front/back setup is the same except one channel will
stop the front brakes and the other will stop the back.

The advantage of the diagonal system is that if one channel fails, you will
still be able to stop using one front and one back wheel.  This will give
you better control.  The front/back arrangement could get you in big trouble
during a failure because if a channel failed, all your braking power would
be to either the front of back wheels.

JB

> HI!
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> cheers all!!
(-AD-) - 25 Jan 2005 16:51 GMT
And Elvis was sitting next to Joe Bisflik in the spaceship, which I
thought was kinda weird, but then they turned to me and said:

> The difference between the Diagonal and a front/back configuration is the
> way each applies pressure to the brakes.  A diagonal MC will have two
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> during a failure because if a channel failed, all your braking power would
> be to either the front of back wheels.

Diagonal split is mainly confined to larger cars nowadays.  Smaller,
shorter cars tend to have dual piston calipers, with one brake circuit
operating one set of front pistons + rear brakes, and the other circuit
the remaining front pistons. Either circuit fails, you still have
working, balanced front brakes.
Nicholas Bales - 26 Jan 2005 13:22 GMT
> Diagonal split is mainly confined to larger cars nowadays.  Smaller,
> shorter cars tend to have dual piston calipers, with one brake circuit
> operating one set of front pistons + rear brakes, and the other circuit
> the remaining front pistons. Either circuit fails, you still have
> working, balanced front brakes.

The diagonal system on the Mini was quite hair-raising. The main
difficulty is maintaining a consistent adjustment on all 4 drums, which,
any drum-equipped Mini driver can testify, is quite ludicrous.

The result with the system is that there is always enough imbalance to
pull the car heavily to one side or the other to spin the car, depending
on how the brakes are set up.

I had this system on both a 1977 and 1978 Belgian-built 1100 Special.
The first thing I did on the 2nd one was to pull out the whole circuit
and to plumb in an entire disk brake circuit from a 1987 donor Mini.
(-AD-) - 26 Jan 2005 13:53 GMT
And Elvis was sitting next to Nicholas Bales in the spaceship, which I
thought was kinda weird, but then they turned to me and said:

> > Diagonal split is mainly confined to larger cars nowadays.  Smaller,
> > shorter cars tend to have dual piston calipers, with one brake circuit
> > operating one set of front pistons + rear brakes, and the other circuit
> > the remaining front pistons. Either circuit fails, you still have
> > working, balanced front brakes.

[diagonal split brakes]

> I had this system on both a 1977 and 1978 Belgian-built 1100 Special.
> The first thing I did on the 2nd one was to pull out the whole circuit
> and to plumb in an entire disk brake circuit from a 1987 donor Mini.

I have to admit that I don't like the idea of the front circuit failing
on the front/rear split Mini setup, leaving just the rear brakes. Would
probably take a long time to stop from any kind of speed, and heaven
help you if you tried to steer ...

I wonder if any of the many people who have fitted twin-circuit Metro
calipers to their Minis have adapted it to the Mero system, as described
above.  Seems like it would be the safest way of doing dual-circuit in a
Mini.

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.