Have anyone ever had a similar experience or heard of?
A few years back I bought a maintenance free Bosch 81080 12V 40Ah car
battery from an auto electrical specialist in west London for my 1978 Mini
Clubman. Actually it was my second battery from them as the first one was
faulty and lost its charge within a week. The second battery had given me
years of trouble free power. That is until recently when, after about five
minutes of starting the car and driving along the road, the engine began to
cut out. I pulled over quickly to the side of the road whereupon I nearly
collided head-on into a metal fence as my brakes had completely failed.
When the car came to a halt I opened the bonnet amidst acrid smoke
billowing from the engine bay with a smell of burnt plastic or rubber. I
called a roadside recovery service who established that the battery had
short circuited and the smoke was most likely caused by the main battery
cable overheating and melting its plastic sleeve. As for the brake
failure, not convinced that it was mere coincide as the recovery man
suggested, I noticed that there was the presence of a fresh white powdery
coating on the otherwise dirty metal brake lines in the engine bay
bulkhead. I could only conclude that the current that melted the battery
cable casing must also have heated the brake lines causing the brake fluid
to boil away leading to total brake failure. The master cylinder and lines
are very close to the earth strap. After the initial burn out, the battery
generated a lot of heat, which in the end took hours to cool. It also
appeared to have switched poles and was no longer providing any more power
to the car. Fitting a new battery and bleeding the brakes fixed the
problems.
Worrying or what? The car now appears to be going fine but I was wondering
about any unseen damage it may have caused.
Colin Stamp - 23 Feb 2005 21:30 GMT
>Worrying or what? The car now appears to be going fine but I was wondering
>about any unseen damage it may have caused.
Very worrying :o(
I can't think of anything that could go wrong with the battery which
would cause damage to wiring under the bonnet. It sounds like there
was a short under the bonnet, which has killed the battery and the
wiring. If you only changed the battery, then the cause for the short
is still in the car somewhere, waiting to happen again. I'd replace
the battery cables as well - sounds like they're now seriously
knackered.
Cheers,
Colin.
F.-Timo Ewald - 24 Feb 2005 00:21 GMT
>> Worrying or what? The car now appears to be going fine but I was
>> wondering about any unseen damage it may have caused.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> the battery cables as well - sounds like they're now seriously
> knackered.
You could also try to put a main fuse in the cable at the "-" pole.
IIRC it should be 60 A. If this fuse blows up, there is a short, but
no fume anyway ;)
Cheers,
Timo
John Manders - 24 Feb 2005 19:59 GMT
> You could also try to put a main fuse in the cable at the "-" pole.
> IIRC it should be 60 A. If this fuse blows up, there is a short, but
> no fume anyway ;)
>
> Cheers,
> Timo
This won't work on a Mini as it would have to take starter motor current and
that can be over 100 amps. If you fit a main line fuse, it has to go in the
main lead off the starter motor lead. These normally come off the starter
solenoid/switch on Mini's. At least they did on the older ones.
John
k - 24 Feb 2005 21:56 GMT
Hi,
It is fairly common for the hot exhaust to move or vibrate and touch the
main battery cable where it rubs under the car. It burns through the plastic
insulation and shorts the cable to earth. This could be where your burnt
plastic smell came from. Check this out as it could happen again.
Keith
> > You could also try to put a main fuse in the cable at the "-" pole.
> > IIRC it should be 60 A. If this fuse blows up, there is a short, but
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> John
F.-Timo Ewald - 24 Feb 2005 23:42 GMT
>> You could also try to put a main fuse in the cable at the "-" pole.
>> IIRC it should be 60 A. If this fuse blows up, there is a short, but
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> normally come off the starter solenoid/switch on Mini's. At least
> they did on the older ones.
Ah, didn't know that the starter current will go that high...
Timo, without electricity problems at the moment (touch wood ;-) )
fragged - 24 Feb 2005 18:17 GMT
hi
your brakes wouldnt just fail, they are double redundant . I would say that
as the engine stopped working there was no longer any pressure in the
manifold to maintain the servo so not having a servo means you almost have
to stand up in the seat to brake with the same force.
fragged
> Have anyone ever had a similar experience or heard of?
>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> Worrying or what? The car now appears to be going fine but I was wondering
> about any unseen damage it may have caused.
John Manders - 24 Feb 2005 19:56 GMT
> hi
> your brakes wouldnt just fail, they are double redundant . I would say that
> as the engine stopped working there was no longer any pressure in the
> manifold to maintain the servo so not having a servo means you almost have
> to stand up in the seat to brake with the same force.
There should be a non-return valve in the vacuum line that prevents this
happening. They have been known to fail. Easy check, see if the brakes work
with the engine off.
I would go with the original suggestion that a short circuit (or heavy load)
put a high current through the brake pipes. Since the car now works this may
have been due to a sticking starter solenoid. Is the alternator OK? if the
main diode pack fails S/C that can draw a lot of current.
The car should be designed so that the brake pipes never take any current.
Check all earth paths, e.g. engine, front subframe, rear subframe. If the
main + battery lead shorted to either subframe, it may only earth through
the brake pipes.
John
ln1gaw - 25 Feb 2005 09:41 GMT
Thanks for your suggestions but I'm still a little unsure. First of all
it's a '78 Clubman therefore no servo assistance and brakes work exactly
the same with engine off. The engine was running for less than five
minutes and still cool. The exhaust pipe is fine and nowhere near the
cable. All evidence suggests it was an electrical problem coming from the
battery causing the brake lines to heat up. When the car came to a halt
the was no electrical power and when the recovery man connected jump leads
to the battery there was still no power and nearly a fire in the boot as
now the earth lead was beginning to melt and smoke. The hot lead had
melted a hole in the battery casing and was starting to leak. When he
disconnected the old battery, which was now very hot, the car started
fine. He disconnected the brake pipe at the bulkhead union and it took
more than four pumps on the pedal before we saw any fluid come out. He
then reconnected the union and bled the wheel cylinders. The old battery
still had power but it was as if the poles had switched. Everything
appears to be working normally now with a new battery. Never had a problem
with starter motor or alternator.
I'm just curious as to how a battery could suddenly do this?
Colin Stamp - 25 Feb 2005 16:01 GMT
>Thanks for your suggestions but I'm still a little unsure. First of all
>it's a '78 Clubman therefore no servo assistance and brakes work exactly
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
>I'm just curious as to how a battery could suddenly do this?
I probably didn't put this forcefully enough in my first reply, but
it's just not possible for a battery fault to cause any of these
problems. If you had smoke under the bonnet, then the original short
was under the bonnet - the smoke will appear between the short and the
battery. Once the original short had caused the cable insulation to
melt, all sorts of possibilities will have opened up for secondary
shorts to keep things nice and toasty until you finally manage to
disconnect the battery. The original short may well have cleared
itself by then, and moving the leads to replace the battery probably
cleared any remaining shorts by fluke. So you put the new battery on,
and everything seems fine. The problem is that the insulation on the
cables is now probably all burned and crumbly and the cause of the
original short still hasn't been found.
The brakes are a different matter. They may even be unconnected to the
electrical problem, but your theory that heat from the cables caused
fluid in the pipes to boil is as plausible as any other. Dual circuit
brakes might well not protect against that.
Cheers,
Colin.