Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / MINI / August 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Rolling radius - something to think about or not?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
greasemonkey78 - 03 Aug 2005 16:17 GMT
Recently I upgraded both the wheels and tyres on my car, and had to go to a
70 profile height instead of 80, because I was worried about the rolling
radius being different to original.  Would this actually have been a
problem, because next time I might fit the higher profile in order to get
a better ride?
Paul Prescott - 04 Aug 2005 22:33 GMT
Depends if you changed the width. Usual reason for going lower profile is to
maintain the gear ratios and speedo calibration (and wheel arch clearance)
when using wider than standard tyres. eg. 145/80/10 is roughly the same
rolling radius as 165/70/10 (and possibly 165/55/12?). The poor ride is the
price you pay for fashionably wide boots. (A lot worse with 175/50/13s, I
would guess.)

> Recently I upgraded both the wheels and tyres on my car, and had to go to a
> 70 profile height instead of 80, because I was worried about the rolling
> radius being different to original.  Would this actually have been a
> problem, because next time I might fit the higher profile in order to get
> a better ride?
Tim - 09 Aug 2005 07:22 GMT
I have two cars (mine and the wifes) on 13's and both are comfortable....my
66 S on 10's is more nimble and easier on tight turning... but feels ever
pot hole in the roads ....

Mind you both cars on 13's have the Moulton Smooth ride kits fitted.....

> Depends if you changed the width. Usual reason for going lower profile is
> to
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>> problem, because next time I might fit the higher profile in order to get
>> a better ride?
Kelley Mascher - 09 Aug 2005 18:50 GMT
Tim, does the '66 'S' still have the 40 year-old rubber springs?

Cheers, Kelley

>I have two cars (mine and the wifes) on 13's and both are comfortable....my
>66 S on 10's is more nimble and easier on tight turning... but feels ever
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>>> problem, because next time I might fit the higher profile in order to get
>>> a better ride?
Steve68s - 10 Aug 2005 09:37 GMT
> Tim, does the '66 'S' still have the 40 year-old rubber springs?
>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>>>> get
>>>> a better ride?

I think his car has new rubber cones fitted, these are part of the moulton
smoothride kit,

Steve.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.