 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Car Forum / MINI / April 2006No song titles shown on the MD-player
I ordered my Mini Cooper with a MD-player instead of a CD-player (thought it was somehow appropriate). Although the sound is superb, I wonder why the display would only indicate the track number "Tr 10" "Tr 12" and not the song title as I bother to enter the song title each time I record a MiniDisc. Is this the case with all the car-MD-players on the market or is it just a flaw on Mini/BMW equipment? Yves i'm afraid you are correct - it is a flaw the flaw being you bought the wrong one - not the wrong player, just the wrong car. This newsgroup is for the classic mini (unless your name is madmax), not the BMW BINI please refer to alt.autos.new-mini for more help. >I ordered my Mini Cooper with a MD-player instead of a CD-player (thought >it [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Yves > i'm afraid you are correct - it is a flaw > the flaw being you bought the wrong one - not the wrong player, just the [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] >> >>Yves Pay no attention to the rudeness of some individuals here. It sounds more like it is in the way you are recording the MD. Can you purchase a prerecorded MD and see if that corrects the problem? I have the same problem on my recorded CD's. >> i'm afraid you are correct - it is a flaw >> the flaw being you bought the wrong one - not the wrong player, just the [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > prerecorded MD and see if that corrects the problem? I have the same > problem on my recorded CD's. Thanks for your reply madmax. I realize from previous posts that there are a few vintage mini ayatollahs in this NG who would have preferred the mini production to be halted as this might have given an icon status to their car (yes some people love their GDR-made Trabant!) Back to the point: no, in this part of the world (Western Europe) it is getting increasingly difficult to find blank MD's, and prerecorded MDs have been out of the shelves for some years now, and anyway, I do not have the impression that this would help: if I put the MD into a portable player, it shows the track title. Yves >i'm afraid you are correct - it is a flaw >the flaw being you bought the wrong one - not the wrong player, just the >wrong car. This newsgroup is for the classic mini (unless your name is >madmax), not the BMW BINI Don't be conned into replying to this troll. It is either our regular or one of his mates. Ignore these people and they will go away. >>i'm afraid you are correct - it is a flaw >>the flaw being you bought the wrong one - not the wrong player, just the [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Don't be conned into replying to this troll. It is either our regular > or one of his mates. Ignore these people and they will go away. I agree David, I just read between the lines and smile, Fitzy > I agree David, > I just read between the lines and smile, > Fitzy > I was just trying to help out with the original question. Perhaps you should try actually reading the lines. Then you wouldn't have that silly smile on your face. >> i'm afraid you are correct - it is a flaw >> the flaw being you bought the wrong one - not the wrong player, just the [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Don't be conned into replying to this troll. It is either our regular > or one of his mates. Ignore these people and they will go away. "One" of his mates ? That narrows it down, he can't have many :-) Jim >I ordered my Mini Cooper with a MD-player instead of a CD-player (thought >it [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Yves A friend had a same problem - take 1 large harmmer ~ sledge preferably, smash all body pannels, interior and mechanicals until left with MD player , then junk for a CD player. Who uses MD?!!? - CDs are fading out for mp3/ iPoos - get one of them. >>I ordered my Mini Cooper with a MD-player instead of a CD-player (thought >>it [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > then junk for a CD player. Who uses MD?!!? - CDs are fading out for mp3/ > iPoos - get one of them. harmmer? >>> I ordered my Mini Cooper with a MD-player instead of a CD-player >>> (thought it [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] >> > harmmer? English tool much like a hammer except much bigger, thus doing more harm HTH Jim >> harmmer? > > English tool much like a hammer except much bigger, thus doing more harm > > HTH > Jim Explains some of the quality English craftsmanship that I have seen. >>> harmmer? >> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Explains some of the quality English craftsmanship that I have seen. Aye, That it does. Isambard Kingdom Brunel for example used them all the time. Now THAT was quality English craftsmanship, Wallace Barnes, Henry Bessemer, Frank Whittle, Sir Geoffrey de Havilland ..... Quality British Engineering all round !! >>>> harmmer? >>> [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > Whittle, Sir Geoffrey de Havilland ..... > Quality British Engineering all round !! Never heard of any.....not too popular out of the UK, huh. [SNIP] >>> Explains some of the quality English craftsmanship that I have seen. >> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Never heard of any.....not too popular out of the UK, huh. Brunel designed and built bridges, the Thames tunnel and hundreds of other historic landmarks. Barnes Wallace designed and built the bouncing bomb and the Lancaster adaptations to carry them (also the aiming mechanism). Henry Bessemer, Steel manufacturing on a mass (and cheap) scale, Frank Whittle, the jet engine, De Havilland, designed and built planes, pioneered long distance jet flight, most famed for The Vampire and Venom fighters. Thusly these guys are famous all around the world, contributed greatly and inspired people world wide in their respective fields, as for other 'crap', British engineering have a look at India's rail service, you'll see ancient British trains still in service still running daily. Closer to you though, how about John Rennie, he too built bridges. The name may not be familiar to most but he built one of the older London Bridges which was in service for years until it was sold and shipped to America and rebuilt brick by brick in the states. By now all English people will have caught on to this historic story as the imbecile that bought the bridge had mixed up London Bridge with Tower Bridge, so wasted a shed load of money not only in buying wrong bridge but also in shipping costs and labour costs. Thanks for the cash Robert McCulloch !! :-) Even the French like to do things like this (yes, even them). How many times has the Eiffel Tower been sold to American tourists ? Funny thing is that is the ONLY notable landmark designed and built by Americans as a gift to the French. Now let's have a look at America's most famous landmark, The Statue of Liberty, that was designed and built by the French in return (also to show up the Americans) for the Eiffel Tower History lesson over Jim > [SNIP] >>>> Explains some of the quality English craftsmanship that I have seen. [quoted text clipped - 43 lines] > > Jim Applause,,,Applause,,Applause C'mon madmax, ( this is the only time I will address you direct,) even you have got to give this guy credit here, even I enjoyed the history lesson Thanks Jim Fitzy >> [SNIP] >>>>> Explains some of the quality English craftsmanship that I have seen. [quoted text clipped - 48 lines] > > Fitzy Damn ! My grammar sucks ! :-) Jim > [SNIP] > [quoted text clipped - 44 lines] > > Jim Whatever you say, chief. >> [SNIP] >> [quoted text clipped - 46 lines] > > Whatever you say, chief. "Whatever I say, what a wonderful philosophy you have" Jim wrote:>> >> Whatever you say, chief. > > "Whatever I say, what a wonderful philosophy you have" Actually, its not a philosophy. Just a "whatever". > Jim wrote:>> >>> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Actually, its not a philosophy. Just a "whatever". .. and I said my grammar sucked ! Be very careful about grammar and spelling in a thread where you kick off about things like that ! 'Actually, it;s not a philosophy, just a "whatever".' would have been correct. The funny thing is, you *REALLY* were trying. This makes me laugh even more. Define philosophy, then define whatever, I think you will find they are the same in this context. After that, watch Mad Max (1) and find the quote in the film. HINT Toecutter going to pick up The Night Rider. After that read the whole of this thread and realise that your 'arguments' show you to be a complete contradiction of yourself, show you to be ill educated and show you that you really have outstayed your welcome on this newsgroup ! This is a newsgroup for the mini, as in Austin, Morris, Leyland, BLMC, Rover Group et al, NOT BMW, although the newsgroup name is alt.autos.mini news group etiquette dictates that you should lurk and read posts to get a taste for the group BEFORE posting, simply doing this for a few days would make it obvious to any fool that this is a group for 'classic' minis and NOT for 'lets try and make millions riding on an old British name' BMW's. Like I say, it's obvious to a fool, but as you are a prodigy internet subscriber (this is just half a notch higher than aol) you will take a few years to elevate your IQ to that of a fool. Your posts thus far have been offensive, unwelcome and in some cases illegal, freedom of speech is one thing but being stupid is another. Look up the words Libel and Slander, read through your old posts, then look up various statutes from 'the land of the free' that you live in and work out how much you'll have to pay the regulars of this newsgroup for your offensive posts, then work out how much you'll have to pay for a net connection once kicked of Prodidgy. You have done your best to try and wind up such people as Fitzy and Taffy on this board, you've only gone so far as to prove you're an imbecile, give up now, take your virtual slapping down, shut up and go to the bmw mini group UNLESS you have something RELEVANT to contribute. PS wanna buy a bridge ?? HTH Jim >> Jim wrote:>> >> [quoted text clipped - 45 lines] > HTH > Jim Jim, All I can say is :you are really full of yourself. If you think that your remarks are going to make me leave, think again. You and your "philosophy" make me just want to hang around this newsgroup even more. Look at the title of this group and you will realize that you are inviting ALL mini owners. As far as libel and slander, you are an idiot of the first degree. I was told off in uncertain terms that my life would be taken by two members of this group. Pretty nice bunch of guys, huh. I have only stood up for myself. So go back into your shell and butt out of things that don't concern you. As far as your bridge, shove it up your a.s. If you really think that my true internet provider is prodigy, then YOU are the fool. >>> Jim wrote:>> >>> [quoted text clipped - 57 lines] > it up your a.s. If you really think that my true internet provider is > prodigy, then YOU are the fool. They may not be prodigy BUT they peer through them ! This group was live well before 1997, infact it's been around for longer than I can find the alt.config logs for ! The new mini was 'made' well after that date so you saying it 'invites' all mini owners is irrelevant (much like your posts) to give people with half a brain the incentive NOT to post to this group about new minis alt.autos.new-mini was created through the usual alt.config request thus having seperate groups for mini owners and new mini owners. You however have totally missed the point of this ! There is NOT alt.config request to rename a newsgroup as this is a total waste of time as usenet has NEVER worked that way. As for me being a fool, in some respects I am, but I admit that, you however are not only full of yourself but also full of S*!T. My philosophy ? when have I ever even hinted at what my philosophy is ? I bet you even had to cut 'n' paste the word ! As loads of people have told you alt.autos.mini is for the Classic mini, as the group was here well before the new mini was even thought about THAT STANDS alt.autos.new-mini is for those with BMW minis ! WHAT IS SO HARD TO UNDERSTAND ABOUT THAT ? you must have an extremely LOW IQ not to realise it after being told who knows how many times. For your own sake get a girlfriend or something ! Jim > They may not be prodigy BUT they peer through them ! Want to bet? > This group was live well before 1997, infact it's been around for longer > than I can find the alt.config logs for ! The new mini was 'made' well [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > through the usual alt.config request thus having seperate groups for > mini owners and new mini owners. Blah Blah Blah You however have totally missed the > point of this ! There is NOT alt.config request to rename a newsgroup as > this is a total waste of time as usenet has NEVER worked that way. > > As for me being a fool, in some respects I am, but I admit that, It's about time! you > however are not only full of yourself but also full of S*!T. Opinion from someone who's opinion doesn't mean a damn thing. > My philosophy ? when have I ever even hinted at what my philosophy is ? > I bet you even had to cut 'n' paste the word ! [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Jim Jim, Jim, Jim,,,,you are the one that started the philosophy crap. I was just dealing the cards back to you. My point regarding the name of this newsgroup still stands. I don't care when it was created. It still has a broad and general title, which would include ALL who own a mini. Regardless of manufacturer. I do realize that you only want certain models of the mini, in this group. Until you change the name I don't plan on leaving. It was my initial warm "f.ck off" welcome and the continual comments from a.s holes, like you, that keep me here. So you may try and lecture me all that you want to. It won't do you any good. And as far as your other comments, have you ever heard of the "pot calling the kettle black" ? >> They may not be prodigy BUT they peer through them ! > [quoted text clipped - 48 lines] > your other comments, have you ever heard of the "pot calling the kettle > black" ? ...................................................................... I don't even bother to read MMax,s posts any more, as they all say the same thing regardless of who feeds him, but lets look at the groups, 1) alt autos mini, started by "Rocky" when there was only one vehicle with the identity "Mini" the group was initially formed for Mini enthusiasts to talk about there minis and to help with problems and repairs to the Mini, the group functioned very well for years without problems, UNTIL 2) alt autos new mini presumably started 1997/8 a new car with mini badges emerges, nothing in common with the old mini,so this forum is for people who own new BMW Minis, its to give advice and help relating to a car we/ some /most of us don't know anything about, 3) two totally different groups and to completely different cars MMax is a new BMW Mini owner, and that's OK, because that's what he wants, I on the other hand own a classic mini, and that's ok, I'm sure MMax couldn't jump across to my group and give helpful advice relating to my mini, and I don't want to go to his group and attempt to talk about a car I don't know anything about either, so why don't we acknowledge the technical differences between these cars and go back to and stay in our respective groups, MMax, if you cant see the sense in this, and you continue to hang around in this group hijacking threads, causing arguments with anyone who feeds your appetite, I can only conclude that you are not interested in Minis of any age, and your not capable of contributing anything other than abuse, Please don't dissect/cut n past when answering Fitzy >>> They may not be prodigy BUT they peer through them ! >> [quoted text clipped - 55 lines] > thing regardless of who feeds him, > but lets look at the groups, Looks like you did though. > 1) alt autos mini, > started by "Rocky" when there was only one vehicle with the identity "Mini" > the group was initially formed for Mini enthusiasts to talk about there > minis and to help with problems and repairs to the Mini, the group > functioned very well for years without problems, > UNTIL Initially BMW didn't make the mini. It now does. Time to change the name of the newsgroup. > 2) alt autos new mini > presumably started 1997/8 a new car with mini badges emerges, nothing in > common with the old mini,so this forum is for people who own new BMW Minis, > its to give advice and help relating to a car we/ some /most of us don't > know anything about, Many of the BMW mini's aren't new anymore. > 3) two totally different groups and to completely different cars Not obvious when doing a search. > MMax is a new BMW Mini owner, and that's OK, because that's what he wants, > I on the other hand own a classic mini, and that's ok, [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > so why don't we acknowledge the technical differences between these cars and > go back to and stay in our respective groups, Because you guys are so fun to f.ck with. > MMax, if you cant see the sense in this, and you continue to hang around in > this group hijacking threads, causing arguments with anyone who feeds your > appetite, I can only conclude that you are not interested in Minis of any > age, and your not capable of contributing anything other than abuse, > > Please don't dissect/cut n past when answering Too late! > Fitzy > > Your last post to me was supposedly the last time that you were going to talk to me. You lied. >>>> They may not be prodigy BUT they peer through them ! >>> [quoted text clipped - 107 lines] > Your last post to me was supposedly the last time that you were going to > talk to me. You lied. MMax Proves your not interested in minis of any kind I will not give you the pleasure of a heated response, because that is an emotion you are not worthy of, I have tried to reason with you on many occasions, without success, I will be posting around your crap in the future, Fitzy >>>>>They may not be prodigy BUT they peer through them ! >>>> [quoted text clipped - 118 lines] > > Promise? Oh so BMW didn't initially make the Mini eh? Well sorry mate but you can't use the word "Initially" to describe over 41 years of production on a hugely famous little car that succeeded beyond all expectations and changed the face of motoring for starters! No I think it's time YOU changed the alt.autos.new-mini newsgroup to something more appropriate like say either "alt.autos.bmw-mini" or perhaps "alt.autos.worthless-pile-of-scrap" which would be more fitting. Taffy Oh so BMW didn't initially make the Mini eh? Well sorry mate but you can't use the word "Initially" to describe over 41 years of production on a hugely famous little car that succeeded beyond all expectations and changed the face of motoring for starters! No I think it's time YOU changed the alt.autos.new-mini newsgroup to something more appropriate like say either "alt.autos.bmw-mini" or perhaps "alt.autos.worthless-pile-of-scrap" which would be more fitting. Taffy > Oh so BMW didn't initially make the Mini eh? Well sorry mate but you > can't use the word "Initially" to describe over 41 years of production [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Taffy It really wasn't that good. You don't need to double post. I really don't know what you are saying though. Are you telling me that BMW did make the original mini. I don't think so. Again you are calling the UK version of the mini as popular. Well not out of the UK, it wasn't. Where did I say in my post that BMW did make the original Mini exactly? All BMW could come up with was a death trap bubble car with a lawn mower engine and the BINI is nothing to be proud of today either as it's simply a poor man's VW Golf! No I was referring to the term "initially" that you used and how it's unsuitable to describe something that was produced for over 41 years and changed the face of motoring etc etc as "initially". And yes the UK version was very popular as it was exported to countries like Japan where they are nuts on real Mini's, but i've already explained to you many times before how the Mini was also manufactured in dozens of other countries (not just European either, but I just can't be bothered to list them all here again!), due to it's high demand. Maybe you should make notes of this information, as you seem to have a memory problem (amongst your other apparant problems that is) and I'm sick of repeating myself. But the conclusion of my post was to state that maybe the new-mini newsgroup should be changed to bmw-mini instead or something similar, as we are not changing ours! Taffy > But the conclusion of my post was to state that maybe the new-mini > newsgroup should be changed to bmw-mini instead or something similar, > as we are not changing ours! Haven't we been through this before? It isn't a case of just digging your heels in harder than them and seeing who gets to keep the name. You can't change a NG's name. It isn't possible. You can create another NG but you can't alter this one or that one. You can keep this as the preserve for the mini by pointing out politely to anyone who strays in here where they should be as there is a NG devoted to the BMW. You can also keep this as a useless place for finding anything out about anything by encouraging trolls to come here as they will get a good argument. In the month and a half I haven't been able to access Usenet this NG has become totally unworkable because of an argument that is going nowhere because the troll gets fed exactly what he wants. "minis are small crap cars" *wait* "piss of you yank w.nker" Repeat ad infinitum If you don't stop it the rest of us will all walk out and then what have you got? Q: WHAT DO YOU WANT? M: Well, I was told outside that this was a mini NG... Q: Don't give me that, you snotty-faced heap of parrot droppings! M: What? Q: Shut your festering gob, you tit! Your type really makes me puke, you vacuous, coffee-nosed, maloderous, pervert!!! M: Look, I CAME HERE FOR AN ARGUMENT, I'm not going to just stand...!! Q: OH, oh I'm sorry, but this is abuse. M: Oh, I see, well, that explains it. Q: Ah yes, you want room 12A, Just along the corridor. M: Oh, Thank you very much. Sorry. Q: Not at all. M: Thank You. (Under his breath) Stupid git!! The Muffin Man ------------- Get FREE newsgroup access from http://www.cheap56k.com >>But the conclusion of my post was to state that maybe the new-mini >>newsgroup should be changed to bmw-mini instead or something similar, [quoted text clipped - 46 lines] > ------------- > Get FREE newsgroup access from http://www.cheap56k.com sh.t, that was a long winded story about nothing at all. You have no talent of any kind. Please go back to your room. > Where did I say in my post that BMW did make the original Mini exactly? > All BMW could come up with was a death trap bubble car with a lawn [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > that was produced for over 41 years and changed the face of motoring > etc etc as "initially". You really need to read what you write. In your last post quote: "Oh so BMW didn't initially make the Mini eh?" What were you trying to say? >> And yes the UK version was very popular as it was exported to countries > like Japan where they are nuts on real Mini's, but i've already [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > to have a memory problem (amongst your other apparant problems that is) > and I'm sick of repeating myself. Then quit repeating yourself. I'm also tired of all the fabricated stories you make up. > But the conclusion of my post was to state that maybe the new-mini > newsgroup should be changed to bmw-mini instead or something similar, > as we are not changing ours! > > Taffy That would probably solve a lot of the problems. But, again, had I been politely pointed in the right direction in the beginning I wouldn't be here. Taffy, it was actually you and Steve that basically told me to f.ck off and that my car was a piece of sh.t. Now how would you take that kind of treatment? Thats why my new hobby is laughing at you jerks.  Signature"Your Only Supposed To Blow The Bloody Doors Off!" > > > Where did I say in my post that BMW did make the original Mini exactly? [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > You really need to read what you write. In your last post quote: "Oh so > BMW didn't initially make the Mini eh?" What were you trying to say? I was just pointing out your ill thought out sentence and the word "initially" that's all! > >> And yes the UK version was very popular as it was exported to countries > > like Japan where they are nuts on real Mini's, but i've already [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Then quit repeating yourself. I'm also tired of all the fabricated > stories you make up. Well if you can't take the truth then that's your problem mate as I don't peddle fabricated stories of any kind, especially when it concerns a British Icon. > > But the conclusion of my post was to state that maybe the new-mini > > newsgroup should be changed to bmw-mini instead or something similar, [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > f.ck off and that my car was a piece of sh.t. Now how would you take > that kind of treatment? Thats why my new hobby is laughing at you jerks. No your only here because there is nothing much happening on the new-mini newsgroup, so regardless of what anyone said to you, you'd still poke your unwelcome nose in here regardless as your a serial piss artist! ------------- Get FREE newsgroup access from http://www.cheap56k.com crawl back under the turd Mark, the Hills are a caling :-) go & take some more pictures & give us all as rest, Steve. > Jim, Jim, Jim,,,,you are the one that started the philosophy crap. I was > just dealing the cards back to you. My point regarding the name of this [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > your other comments, have you ever heard of the "pot calling the kettle > black" ? > crawl back under the turd Mark, the Hills are a caling :-) go & take some > more pictures & give us all as rest, > > Steve. Steve, outstanding spelling. Again your lack of intelligence is amazing. Thank you for the kind words though. >> They may not be prodigy BUT they peer through them ! > [quoted text clipped - 48 lines] > And as far as your other comments, have you ever heard of the "pot > calling the kettle black" ? Pot calling kettle black ? yep I've heard the saying, I also know what it means ! You however obviously do not. Try reading posts BEFORE replying to them ! How many times have I stated there is NO provision for renaming newsgroups ? You do not have a grip on reality do you ? It seems that you are proving once and for all that Americans are only good for one thing .... Shooting their own presidents ! ..... go figure and do the world a favour :-) Also before you start winging about peoples spelling PLEASE differentiate between there and their ! You are one of the biggest buffoons I have ever had the pleasure to correspond with, if you were not so entertaining by the fact you show yourself up so much I would have kill filed you ages ago, but, as happens I enjoy watching small minded bigots ridicule themselves :-) And YES I DO bet your isp, if not prodigy, does peer through them ! I bet BIG TIME !! HINT when posting to usenet (that's newsgroups in general as your brain will not be able to comprehend) the x-mailer attaches it's own header and then the first usenet server will attach it's own header which is EXTREMELY difficult to forge, as you have proved, you just don't have the brain power, stamina or attention span to learn how to do that. Prodigy do not allow anonymous posting so you either have to be a prodigy customer OR your isp has to be a prodigy customer. lra1g.72339$dW3.26230@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com prodigy usenet server receiving first post ping newssvr21.news.prodigy.com 63.201.28.146 in prodigy's ip range X-trace newssvr21.news.prodigy.com 1145385809 ST000 63.201.28.146 (Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:43:29 EDT) including timezone offset ??? yep that's prodigy alright So YEP I bet alright Like I said you may not be a prodigy customer directly but someone that peers through them and uses their usenet upfeed like for example if you were a dsl customer with nvbell.net Quote "On August 28, 2001, your Usenet Newsgroup server will change from news.nvbell.net to news.region.sbcglobal.net supported by Prodigy. " Nuff said, Prove me wrong r-tard :-) Jim (Solaris sys-admin and REAL mini driver/enthusiast) Top posting for brevity. No reply to this maxy boy ???!!! >>> They may not be prodigy BUT they peer through them ! >> [quoted text clipped - 104 lines] > > Jim (Solaris sys-admin and REAL mini driver/enthusiast) > >>> Jim wrote:>> > >>> [quoted text clipped - 83 lines] > > Jim DON'T YOU MEAN "BOYFRIEND"? >>For your own sake get a girlfriend or something ! >> >>Jim > > DON'T YOU MEAN "BOYFRIEND"? Which ever way you sway xx. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.