Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / MINI / July 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

What is the plural of "Mini Cooper S" ?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
ship - 03 Jul 2008 11:21 GMT
What is the plural of "Mini Cooper S" ?

"Mini Cooper Ss"
"Mini Cooper S's"
"Mini Cooper Ses"
"Mini Cooper S-es"
"Mini Cooper S' "

I need to know for my website!

Ship
Shiperton Henethe
madMental - 03 Jul 2008 16:51 GMT
> What is the plural of "Mini Cooper S" ?
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Ship
> Shiperton Henethe

Mini Cooper S'
Sanity's Little Helper - 03 Jul 2008 21:01 GMT
madMental <mm@mentalmail.ru> barked:

>> What is the plural of "Mini Cooper S" ?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Mini Cooper S'

No, that's the possessive pronoun.

Signature

David Silverman
aa #2208
Defender of Civilisation
Lord Mayor of Dis
Lawful copyright holder of the term "Earthquack".

Not authentic without this signature.

captdan@aol.com - 03 Jul 2008 21:19 GMT
> madMental <mm@mentalmail.ru> barked:
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> No, that's the possessive pronoun.

I hate it when they become overly possessive.
J666 - 03 Jul 2008 21:34 GMT
>> madMental <mm@mentalmail.ru> barked:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> I hate it when they become overly possessive.

Then call an exorcist.
Chuck Stamford - 04 Jul 2008 05:29 GMT
> madMental <mm@mentalmail.ru> barked:
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> No, that's the possessive pronoun.

It'd FIRST  have to be a pronoun to be a possive pronoun, and it's not a
pronoun.
Mike Painter - 04 Jul 2008 05:57 GMT
>> madMental <mm@mentalmail.ru> barked:
>>
>>>> What is the plural of "Mini Cooper S" ?

I think Tolstoy wrote a short story about an office in the government that
wanted fire tongs for thier coal stove. They needed two and the story
revolves around what the plural of fire tongs is.

To sterael teh ending

Mini Cooper S, more than one.
Kadaitcha Man - 04 Jul 2008 08:24 GMT
Chuck Stamford, ye perverted unspeaking sot, out, you mad headed ape. A
weasel hath not such a deal of spleen as you are tossed with, ye
reproached:

>> No, that's the possessive pronoun.
>
> It'd FIRST  have to be a pronoun to be a possive pronoun, and it's not a
> pronoun.

LMFAO. You complete dickhead.

Signature

alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]

Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member: Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Official Overseer of Kooks & Trolls in 24hoursupport.helpdesk

Member of:
  Usenet Ruiner List
  Top a.sholes on the Net List
  Most hated usenetizens of all time List
  Cog in the AUK Hate Machine List

Find me on Google Maps: 24°39'47.13"S, 134°4'20.18"E

Join me for dinner. I'm cooking threatening cadaver foreskins garnished
with besmirched heads of lettuce and frogmouth owl carbuncle topping,
served in a randomly twitching pot heaped with warm remnants of rhubarb
and particles of celery in sour cream, a side of mongoose uterus and a
bowl of creamed duck sh.t.

Chuck Stamford - 04 Jul 2008 18:40 GMT
> Chuck Stamford, ye perverted unspeaking sot, out, you mad headed ape. A
> weasel hath not such a deal of spleen as you are tossed with, ye
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> LMFAO. You complete dickhead.

Did I do something horrible to you Teddy Bear, or something?  Or are you
just enamored with the hope of becoming the most vile human being in the
Net?
Kadaitcha Man - 05 Jul 2008 02:03 GMT
Chuck Stamford, ye broken-down burly-boned clown, thou art a disease
that must be cut away, ye honked:

>> Chuck Stamford, ye perverted unspeaking sot, out, you mad headed ape. A
>> weasel hath not such a deal of spleen as you are tossed with, ye
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> just enamored with the hope of becoming the most vile human being in the
> Net?

You'd do well to learn English before you give lessons in it, loser.

Signature

alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]

Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member: Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Official Overseer of Kooks & Trolls in 24hoursupport.helpdesk

Member of:
  Usenet Ruiner List
  Top a.sholes on the Net List
  Most hated usenetizens of all time List
  Cog in the AUK Hate Machine List

Find me on Google Maps: 24°39'47.13"S, 134°4'20.18"E

Join me for dinner. I'm cooking sickly chicken entrails and frog
droppings seasoning garnished with spoiled syphilis scabs con bloody
used tampons, cooked in a bubbling cup brimming with medium-rare almond,
watery oddments of an unidentifiable organ, live mosquito larvae and
bologna, fresh blood, a side of polecat testicles and a bucket of pond
scum.

honestjohn@centurytel.net - 05 Jul 2008 02:55 GMT
> Chuck Stamford, ye broken-down burly-boned clown, thou art a disease
> that must be cut away, ye honked:
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> You'd do well to learn English before you give lessons in it, loser.

BE PROUD, BLACK MAN!

HJ
Chuck Stamford - 05 Jul 2008 06:21 GMT
> Chuck Stamford, ye broken-down burly-boned clown, thou art a disease
> that must be cut away, ye honked:
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> You'd do well to learn English before you give lessons in it, loser.

Are you suggesting that "Mini Cooper S" is a pronoun??  Or is it you don't
care so long as you've got another chance to be insulting?
Kadaitcha Man - 05 Jul 2008 06:35 GMT
Chuck Stamford, ye dish-eared caitiff recreant, dissembling harlot, thou
are false in all, ye scribbled:

>> Chuck Stamford, ye broken-down burly-boned clown, thou art a disease
>> that must be cut away, ye honked:
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Are you suggesting that "Mini Cooper S" is a pronoun??

Where did you get that idea? You were told you were a dickhead who needed to
learn English, you stupid, illiterate git.

> Or is it you don't care so long as you've got another chance to be
> insulting?

"possive pronoun"
"do something horrible to you Teddy Bear"
", or"

You f.cking dense c.nt. You sit there calling people on their use of words
and you can't even construct a f.cking coherent sentence.

Signature

alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]

Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member: Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Official Overseer of Kooks & Trolls in 24hoursupport.helpdesk

Member of:
  Usenet Ruiner List
  Top a.sholes on the Net List
  Most hated usenetizens of all time List
  Cog in the AUK Hate Machine List

Find me on Google Maps: 24°39'47.13"S, 134°4'20.18"E

Join me for dinner. I'm cooking ruined turkey buzzard innards
accompanied by brewed intestine on top of pickled tarantula kidney
stones and moose mucus membrane conserve accompanied with decomposing
alpaca carbuncle and loused up spew with injured hedgehog vomit and
dromedary camel puddings preserve accompanied with dinged vampire bat
gumboil, dished up in a wriggling deep dish overflowing with flavourless
specks of potato and cooked cashew in stinking stinking slime, a side of
sheep cervix and a few ounces of prairie wolf vaginal secretions.

Chuck Stamford - 05 Jul 2008 09:13 GMT
> Chuck Stamford, ye dish-eared caitiff recreant, dissembling harlot, thou
> are false in all, ye scribbled:
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
>
> You fuc...

As I thought.  You're so intent on being malicious, even a typo will do.
You make my spine crawl wondering what it's like to be you.
Kadaitcha Man - 05 Jul 2008 10:08 GMT
Chuck Stamford, ye roguish false peer, a villain with a smiling cheek, a
goodly apple rotten at the heart, ye grimaced:

> "Kadaitcha f.cking ARSEWIPE! Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com>
> wrote f.cking PIECE-OF-SNATCH! in message
> news:gnuwc6$vwz$z@comp.sex.grizzled-cadger.co.chad... f.cking BANGING
> FUDGE! SPUNK BLASTER! SEX BONE! BLACK MORIAH! DOUBLE D CUPS!

> As f.cking BROAD! I thought.  f.cking BOAR-PIG! You're so intent
> f.cking BACK EYE! DICK BREATH! BIT OF MUTTON! on being malicious,
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> JOCKEY! ANAL-COPULATOR! FLESH ENEMA! it's like to f.cking RETARD!
> c.nt-STICKER! BUTT BREATH! be you. ORGASM! ANAL-INTRUDER!

Oh, come on. What on earth makes you think I'm intent on being
malicious?

Signature

alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]

Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member: Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Official Overseer of Kooks & Trolls in 24hoursupport.helpdesk

Member of:
  Usenet Ruiner List
  Top a.sholes on the Net List
  Most hated usenetizens of all time List
  Cog in the AUK Hate Machine List

Find me on Google Maps: 24°39'47.13"S, 134°4'20.18"E

Join me for dinner. I'm cooking flash cooked toadfish penis and scorpion
canker garnish with browned heart aside adulterated used cat litter
chips and cadaver rot compote, simmered in a wriggling mug brimming with
sickly chunks of cucumber and dessicated fungus in parsnip juice, a side
of ostrich uterus and a beaker of vaginal discharge.

Porsche Monkey For Life - 05 Jul 2008 13:25 GMT
> "Kadaitcha Man" wrote...
>> Chuck Stamford, ye dish-eared caitiff recreant, dissembling harlot, thou
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
> As I thought.  You're so intent on being malicious, even a typo will do.
> You make my spine crawl wondering what it's like to be you.

"Possive" isn't just one typo...Indeed, it looks like you're a very sloppy
typist. Too sloppy to have much credibility when it comes to handing out
grammatical advice. Mind you, I'm not saying I never make typos, but I
tend to catch them.

Signature

________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; Usenet Ruiner #5; Official Chung Demon
The original "Henry Schmidt"; Top a.shole #3; Lits Slut #16
COOSN-029-06-71069; Most Hated Usenetizen of All Time #13
Gutter Chix0r #17; BowTie's Spuriously Accused Pedo Photographer #4
AUK Psycho & Felon #21; Parrot & Zombie #2
Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
"Do not taunt the Happy Fun Ball. If Happy Fun Ball starts to smoke, run
away and take cover."

Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life
The PM4L FAQ: http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/

================================================
Brad Jesness Memorial Kook Appraisal Test (KAT or KAT Index) v. 5.1 by
Cipher and the a.u.k crew

So, you think you've got a contender, eh? Hard to separate the Kooks
from the mere pains in the a.s though. Hopefully this will help you.

Instructions :
In this section give your Prospective Kook ONE point for every YES
answer. Give your Prospective Kook additional points for multiple
occurrences.

Grading scale follows questions.

Have they ever :

1. Been the first to go ad-hominem in a newsgroup debate.

2. Accused someone of breaking a non-existent Federal Law.

3. Called a properly formatted cancel of a BI>20 article a *forged
cancel*

4. Ranted about *Free Speech* when a moderator rejected their article.
Two points if it's spelled "FREE SPEACH".

5. Tried to censor others, yet scream when others suggest that they
killfile them or create a moderated newsgroup.

6. Complained to someone's ISP when they got spanked in a flame war.

7. Been complained about to their ISP deservedly.

8. Flamed someone from an anonymous account.

9. Made a spelling flame. (*)

10. Used RANT-CAPS & manic punctuation.

11. Claimed to be qualified to make a legal determination or medical
diagnosis with no justification - bonus points if the kook is obviously
projecting her/his *own* condition/behavior. (**)

12. Claimed an academic or professional degree they obviously do not
have.

13. Claimed that because of a degree or research topic, another poster
cannot know anything about any other subject.

In this section give your Prospective Kook TWO points for every YES
answer. Give your Prospective Kook additional points for multiple
occurrences.

1. Called someone a pedophile or drug pusher without proof.

2. Bonus if they called anyone a "Republican Nazi Pedophile"

3. Ranted about *Free Speech* when an anti-spammer canceled their
article.

4. Posted to a newsgroup via sock-puppet.

5. Thought about becoming a Freedom Knight.

6. Voted via sock-puppet in a Big Eight vote.

7. Defended a well known kook.

8. Been Nominated for a Kook award.

9. Invented Usenet 'rules' & 'laws', particularly coming up with
creative definitions for what constitutes spam & spamming.

10. Implied that she/he has powerful allies who will deal with his/her
enemies, due to having affiliations with Microsoft, the CIA or some
other powerful organization - no matter how flimsy the association.

11. Claimed an academic or professional degree after having stated they
are a high school dropout or otherwise indicated their actual level of
achievement, or claim multiple PhD's, MD's, etc.

12. 'Removed' an academic or professional degree or title from another
more clueful poster. (Includes scare quotes such as 'Esq.', or 'Dr.')

13. Claimed one of the well known regulars of AUK is using a remailer to
impersonate them, when all kook sign points to them.

In this section give your Prospective Kook THREE points for every YES
answer. Give your Prospective Kook additional points for multiple
occurrences.

1. Threatened to kill or cause bodily harm to another via mail or post.

2. Told someone they have caused the kook to harm himself.

3. Stalked/harassed an opponent off-line.

4. Mail-bombed anyone.

5. Spammed a newsgroup.

6. Posted a forged or altered newsgroup article.

7. Lost an account due to abuse.

8. Won a kook award.

9. Threatened a groundless lawsuit via mail or post. LA Law bonus:
Additional point if a TV lawyer is used.)

(Grubor bonus: If they claim John Grubor/Law Systems Institoot as
counsel)

10. Threatened to have their "agents" come after someone.

11. Had a FAQ posted about their kookiness.

12. Pretended to be a sysadmin or ISP owner.

13. CC'ed emailed complaints to irrelevant or non-existent organizations
email addresses, such as the DOJ, AG, CIA, FBI etc.

14. Been TOSsed and then claimed to have canceled it, her/it/himself?

(*) PalmJob Exception Rule. Cannot be applied to a mere troll's points.

(**) Brad Jesness Factor. Not applicable to BJ, it is expected.

Scale/Rank :
1 - 10 points : Kook Wannabe. Needs to read Grubor's posting history on
dejanews. Your Prospective Kook has much to learn. They may have just
screwed up once or twice.

11 - 25 points : Journeyman Kook. Needs to Continue to mimic the real
kooks. Your Prospective Kook could be a contender.

26 - 36 points : Kook First Class. Still a lesser light, but Your
Prospective Kook HAS arrived! People killfile him/her.

36 - 50 points : Kook cum Laude. Someone is considering writing a FAQ
about your Prospective Kook. Has been nominated for at least one a.u.k
award.

51 + points : Kook Magna cum Laude. Your Prospective Kook has a FAQ.
Your Prospective Kook will eventually win all the big awards. Your
Prospective Kook can leap tall newbies with a single bound.

Van - 05 Jul 2008 13:50 GMT
On Jul 5, 7:25 am, Porsche Monkey For Life
<PorscheMonkey4L...@iridebutyoudrive.com> wrote:

> > "Kadaitcha Man" wrote...
> >> Chuck Stamford, ye dish-eared caitiff recreant, dissembling harlot, thou
[quoted text clipped - 209 lines]
> Your Prospective Kook will eventually win all the big awards. Your
> Prospective Kook can leap tall newbies with a single bound.

OMG some people on here need to get some lives, holy sh.t! he made one
typo, and suddenly hes unfit to give out advice, and hes being double
team a.s raped by monkey and kadaitche or however you spell it....
Chuck Stamford - 05 Jul 2008 19:05 GMT
On Jul 5, 7:25 am, Porsche Monkey For Life
<PorscheMonkey4L...@iridebutyoudrive.com> wrote:
> On the long hot summer day of Sat, 05 Jul 2008 01:13:42 -0700, Chuck
> Stamford dribbled:
[quoted text clipped - 213 lines]
> Your Prospective Kook will eventually win all the big awards. Your
> Prospective Kook can leap tall newbies with a single bound.

OMG some people on here need to get some lives, holy sh.t! he made one
typo, and suddenly hes unfit to give out advice, and hes being double
team a.s raped by monkey and kadaitche or however you spell it....

Chuck:

I don't mind the above.  It's the stepping over "Sanity's Little Helper's",
"No, that's the possessive pronoun." to do it, and doing it with such crude
vitriole, as "Kadaitcha Man" did that sticks in my craw.  It's the
discriminatory element, the vile bigotry on parade I find so repulsive, not
the pettiness.
Kadaitcha Man - 06 Jul 2008 00:44 GMT
Chuck Stamford, ye unhygienic obstinate tallow-catch, what a drunken
knave the sea was to cast thee in our way, ye discoursed:

> On Jul 5, 7:25 am, Porsche Monkey For Life
> <PorscheMonkey4L...@iridebutyoudrive.com> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 225 lines]
>
> I don't mind the above.

What, ass-raping?

> It's the stepping over "Sanity's Little Helper's", "No, that's the
> possessive pronoun." to do it, and doing it with such crude vitriole, as
> "Kadaitcha Man" did...

Even if it is granted that you made a typo, you made at least two other
errors in the same post that were grammatical, not typographical. Now,
grammatical errors in and of themselves are nothing to write home about and
are generally ignored, however you were making even more language errors
whilst trying to set yourself forward as some kind of language expert.

The latter fact makes you a potential k0oK and justifies your being jumped
on for your errors.

Rule #1 of language-laming: Do not make a single mistake when
language-laming.

> that sticks in my craw.  It's the discriminatory element, the vile bigotry
> on parade I find so repulsive, not the pettiness.

k0oKsign.

PS:
Do not quote periods mid-sentence.
There is no e in vitriol.

HTH

Signature

alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]

Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member: Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Official Overseer of Kooks & Trolls in 24hoursupport.helpdesk

Member of:
  Usenet Ruiner List
  Top a.sholes on the Net List
  Most hated usenetizens of all time List
  Cog in the AUK Hate Machine List

Find me on Google Maps: 24°39'47.13"S, 134°4'20.18"E

Join me for dinner. I'm cooking half-cooked sea horse vein with garlic
vinaigrette with stinking brain aside repugnant used tampons, dished up
in a circulating deep dish containing chilled morsels of cashew and
cooked onion in salt water, a side of melanoma and a pint of vaginal
discharge.

Chuck Stamford - 06 Jul 2008 05:57 GMT
> Chuck Stamford, ye unhygienic obstinate tallow-catch, what a drunken
> knave the sea was to cast thee in our way, ye discoursed:
[quoted text clipped - 241 lines]
>
> Even if it is granted that you made a typo...

Ah, you're willing to grant the obvious.  What progress!  What honor!  What
a sense of justice and forebearance!  What a sterling example of noble
humanity on display!

>, you made at least two other
> errors in the same post that were grammatical, not typographical. Now,
> grammatical errors in and of themselves are nothing to write home about
> and
> are generally ignored, however you were making even more language errors
> whilst trying to set yourself forward as some kind of language expert.

First of all, it doesn't take a "language expert" to notice that a noun is
not a personal pronoun.

Second, you CLAIM I made two other grammatical errors in the same post, but
don't identify them, so you're still hissing in the dark afaic.

> Rule #1 of language-laming: Do not make a single mistake when
> language-laming.

I wasn't trying to "language-lame" SLH.  I was pointing out, in a very
forceful, but not slanderous way, the basic flaw in his/her suggestion as to
the spelling s/he suggested.

>> that sticks in my craw.  It's the discriminatory element, the vile
>> bigotry
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Do not quote periods mid-sentence.
> There is no e in vitriol.

Corrections noted.  If you're doing it to help me improve my writing, I
thank you.  If you're doing it to try and justify what you did to me, why
don't you just crawl back under your rock.  There is a glaring difference
between the inability to distinguish between parts of speech, and the
vagaries of English spelling or the finer points of proper punctuation, and
you're still willing to run rough-shod over that difference to vent your
spleen.

If your standard is perfection before one is allowed to correct another,
then who do you think you are?
Kadaitcha Man - 06 Jul 2008 07:40 GMT
Chuck Stamford, ye monotonic summer-fly, thou misshapen Dick, ye choked
out:

>> Chuck Stamford, ye unhygienic obstinate tallow-catch, what a drunken
>> knave the sea was to cast thee in our way, ye discoursed:
[quoted text clipped - 247 lines]
>
> Ah, you're willing to grant the obvious.

if
–conjunction
1. supposing that; a supposition

> What progress!  What honor!  What a sense of justice and forebearance!
> What a sterling example of noble humanity on display!

<aside>
<indicates up>
What shite.

>>, you made at least two other
>> errors in the same post that were grammatical, not typographical. Now,
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> First of all, it doesn't take a "language expert" to notice that a noun is
> not a personal pronoun.

I did not claim it was, you f.ck-knuckled moron.

> Second, you CLAIM I made two other grammatical errors in the same post,
> but don't identify them,

Oh, but I did. You snipped and ran, like the coward you are, and tried to
divert attention from them. See...?

news:23Gbk.15213$3q7.4491@newsfe15.lga

You may now apologise for your bare-faced lies and excuses.

> so you're still hissing in the dark afaic.

Did you mean afaik or afaiac, fat fingers?

>> Rule #1 of language-laming: Do not make a single mistake when
>> language-laming.
>
> I wasn't<BITCHSLAP>

Don't argue with your betters.

> If you're doing it to try and justify what you did to me

I will keep doing whatever it is that pleases me, and I will do it how, when
and as I see fit.

Now, about that apology for your lies:

> Second, you CLAIM I made two other grammatical errors in the same post,
> but don't identify them,

Hop to it, Rastus.

Signature

Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member: Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Official Overseer of Kooks & Trolls in 24hoursupport.helpdesk

Chuck Stamford - 06 Jul 2008 10:07 GMT
> Chuck Stamford, ye monotonic summer-fly, thou misshapen Dick, ye choked
> out:
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>>>>> >>>> that must be cut away, ye honked:
>>>>> >>>>> "Kadaitcha Man" wrote...
snip

>>>> It's the stepping over "Sanity's Little Helper's", "No, that's the
>>>> possessive pronoun." to do it, and doing it with such crude vitriole,
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> –conjunction
> 1. supposing that; a supposition

Didn't say you did.  I said you're willing to.

>> What progress!  What honor!  What a sense of justice and forebearance!
>> What a sterling example of noble humanity on display!
>
> <aside>
> <indicates up>
> What shite.

Spelled s-a-r-c-a-s-m

>>>, you made at least two other
>>> errors in the same post that were grammatical, not typographical. Now,
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> I did not claim it was, you f.ck-knuckled moron.

The nearly instantaneous resort to the crude ad hominem, typical of the
underpowered intellect...and your posts.

>> Second, you CLAIM I made two other grammatical errors in the same post,
>> but don't identify them,
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> You may now apologise for your bare-faced lies and excuses.

"same post".  Try reading your own stuff if you're not going to read mine.
Just because you cut and paste them into one post doesn't make it a fact I
made the errors in the same post!  And both were typos.  I know the
difference between "you" and its possessive form "your".

>> so you're still hissing in the dark afaic.
>
> Did you mean afaik or afaiac, fat fingers?

Just what I wrote.

>>> Rule #1 of language-laming: Do not make a single mistake when
>>> language-laming.
>>
>> I wasn't<BITCHSLAP>
>
> Don't argue with your betters.

LOL!  That's funny.  Have a nice whatever it is you want to call what you're
doing.
Chuck Stamford - 06 Jul 2008 10:08 GMT
Chuck Stamford, ye waxy-eared one whose grossness little characters sum
up, a fellow of the strangest mind in the world, ye affirmed:

> I worry far more about disappointing others than about letting myself
> down.
Kadaitcha Man - 06 Jul 2008 10:15 GMT
Chuck Stamford, ye bizarre vile-lady, your peevish chastity is not worth
a breakfast in the cheapest country, ye orated:

>> Chuck Stamford, ye monotonic summer-fly, thou misshapen Dick, ye choked
>> out:
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
>
> Spelled s-a-r-c-a-s-m

I'm glad you pointed it out. it wasn't all that obvious.

>>>>, you made at least two other
>>>> errors in the same post that were grammatical, not typographical. Now,
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> posts. IDIOT! SCREW! GOT THE CLAP! CABBAGE HEAD! EXCRESCENCE! f.cking
> c.nt-STICKER!

How rude.

PS: Even after telling you outright what it was for, you still fell for it.

>>> Second, you CLAIM I made two other grammatical errors in the same post,
>>> but don't identify them,
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> "same post".  Try<BITCHSLAP>

You try apolgising for your lies.

>>> so you're still hissing in the dark afaic.
>>
>> Did you mean afaik or afaiac, fat fingers?
>
> Just what I wrote.

So, what does just what you wrote mean to you?

>>>> Rule #1 of language-laming: Do not make a single mistake when
>>>> language-laming.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> LOL<BITCHSLAP>

Who gave you permission to laugh?

Signature

alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]

Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member: Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Official Overseer of Kooks & Trolls in 24hoursupport.helpdesk

Member of:
  Usenet Ruiner List
  Top a.sholes on the Net List
  Most hated usenetizens of all time List
  Cog in the AUK Hate Machine List

Find me on Google Maps: 24°39'47.13"S, 134°4'20.18"E

Join me for dinner. I'm cooking appalling squirrel stomach and seal
canker topping with crisped bladder aside unpleasant live rat embryos on
top of over-cooked horse flies and cat crutch extract under exposed
human armpit hairs and flying squirrel innards sauce, simmered in a
splashing mug overflowing with imported scraps of pea in butter, a side
of foetal catfish lung and a draught of mouldy yoghurt.

Chuck Stamford - 06 Jul 2008 07:55 GMT
Chuck Stamford, ye insane anointed sovereign of sighs and groans, a
wholesome jackanapes must take me up for swearing, as if I borrowed mine
oaths of thee, ye harassed:

> Yeasty hey-hey-hussy with yawning gap, gimpy garbos, and peewee anal
> collar would die for gigantic skippy for invigorating palm pokin'.
>
> Email me at mailto:shell-stamford@cox.net.
The Secretary of HomIntern - 06 Jul 2008 06:21 GMT
>> > "Kadaitcha Man" wrote...
>> >> Chuck Stamford, ye dish-eared caitiff recreant, dissembling harlot,
[quoted text clipped - 50 lines]
> typo, and suddenly hes unfit to give out advice, and hes being double team
> a.s raped by monkey and kadaitche or however you spell it....

...No, not "one" typo, but multiple. "Possive" is three typos in one
sentence, frex. That's sufficient to make him laughably incoherent.
Handing out grammatical advice when one can't even be bothered to
proofread that advice is the very height of comedy, and gives the
impression that he spits out the words he's typing in his posts,
periodically stopping to scream in rage.

Signature

________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! "The personal _is_ political."
Bent Depraved N. Deviant Cock-Smoker, Esq., Superfaggot
COOSN-029-06-71069; Usenet Ruiner #5; Official Chung Demon
Most Hated Usenetizen of All Time #13; Top a.shole #3; Lits Slut #16
Gutter Chix0r #17; BowTie's Spuriously Accused Pedo Photographer #4
AUK Psycho & Felon #21; Parrot & Zombie #2
Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
Rotate email munge 13 times to get real addy
"The moral of the story is: Kill the parents kill the children."

"What a lame copycat you are." -- the PorchMonkey4Life, posting as "The
Secretary of HomIntern", in MID: <UkdTh.2573$Z66.747@trnddc06>,
re-defines irony yet again.

Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of the PorchMonkey4Life
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/

"Stupidity excuses nothing.  It's only a reason...." -- Phxbrd
Old politicalcompass.org:
Economic Left/Right: -7.63 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.38
New political compass:
Economic Left/Right: -6.75 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.67
Odd. I seem to be swaying.

"The whining has just begun." -- John Wentzky, in Message-ID:
<Ie2Qe.8199$wb5.1083@bignews1.bellsouth.net>

Killfiled by: directory; Anim8rfsk
"It's not nice to misrepresent Mother Nature."
http://www.lowgenius.net/kookway.htm
TEH WAY OF THE K00K
Never learn from your mistakes.
Always practice your mistakes; you may get them right.
Always pick on those smarter and tougher than you.
Always believe that only you know the TRVTH.
Never allow logic or reason get in the way of a good k00k.
When being overwhelmed by logic and reason: k00ksuit!
If you are going to be wrong, do it at the top of your lungs.
When caught in a lie: LIE!
When in doubt: Order the Crab Won Ton
Plagiarism is your friend. Use it.
Whenever contradicted; morph, start calling people names, and make false
accusations. Include the children of your target in your allegations,
even if they don't have any.
(06-Jun-05) When nobody else will listen, post to your own fan group.
(06-Jun-05) Obviously, since you have your own fan group, this must mean
that you have fans. Post prolifically to your fan group - you wouldn't
want to disappoint them!
(10-May-2005)Everyone reads usenet. Approval here means approval
everywhere.
Post numerous blank posts, or posts containing only a message id.
Post numerous copy&paste web articles from crackerpot websites.
Never forget to call kookologists "k00ks."
If there are several, call them "sockpuppets" too
When all else fails, accuse various and sundry kookologists of e-mailing
viruses to you.  This is a sure-fire method of garnering sympathy and
ensuring that the General Public will always see things your way.  An
especially effective sub-strategy here is to accuse them of infecting
you with the 'Sasser' worm via e-mail.
Quote notorious scientists or writers - it makes it look as if they
approve the drivel you are writing!
(9-Jul-05) Anytime your computer is infected with a virus, bogged down
by spyware, attacked over your internet connection, or otherwise suffers
from preventable problems, government agencies are responsible and are
trying to silence you and are monitoring your computer files.
Ignore all traffic signs and feel free to trespass, you don't have to
obey any rules.
Scare your enemies with lawsuits, police escorts and whines.
Always back up your empty (albeit noisy) threats with phony LARTs, false
police reports, and harassing letters to the FBI and other gubbermint
agencies.
Be vigilant in your redundancy. The more you repeat yourself, the more
likely others will believe you!
If you can't find anyone as crazy as yourself to support you in the
flamewars you start with the normal population, create sock puppets and
use anonymous remailers that shamelessly hang on every word you write.
(17-Mar-05) When dealing with law enforcement, remember that it is they
who have the problem, not you.  Be sure to inform them of this at every
available opportunity, as they will surely appreciate your constructive
criticism.  Be sure to make them aware that YOU KNOW YOUR RIGHTS!  ("The
cops like that, when people know their rights.  That way they don't have
to read them to you on the way to the station." - George Carlin)
The more your fake personalities adulate you, the more respect you'll
get!
When confronted with a reality that you don't like: Announce loudly
that you are departing, never to return as long as there's an Internet.
Come back in three or four days and claim you were drunk, hacked,
abducted by alience, or forged. Alternately you can just not even
mention your prior departure, and if anyone asks you about it, either
ignore them or respond with something along the lines of "YOUR NOT THE
BOSS OF ME!  *PLONK*!" People really know you mean business then.
Always remain clueproof.
(20-Mar-05) Anyone who does not believe that you are the reincarnation
of [$DEITY_OR_PROPHET] is obviously an infidel lacking in faith whose
soul in in peril of everlasting damnation.
When responding to one line challenges, post paragraphs of rants and
screed in response.
Incoherency is not a roadblock to poasting.
Neither is illiteracy.
Delusions poasted often enough become fact.
Claim you will destroy <insert newsfroup> for attacking you.
When spnaked, send cmsg for Fanboi newsfroup(s).
Find your Lame, Use your Lame, Be your Lame!
Post Edit when the TRVTH hurts.
Always sneck the offending newsfroups.
Always poast pictures of yourself so you can be admired in all your k00ky
glory.
Always accuse others of the very acts you are guilty of.
Post lots of boasts about your high IQ and incredible talents.
(20-Mar-05) If you repeat a lie often enough, it becomes the truth.
Anybody who fails to understand this is engaged in a deliberate campaign
of misinformation and character assassination.
Always <plonk> somebody just before replying the plonkee!
The k00k considers itself the most intelligent person in any
conversation, possibly on the planet. Other people are benighted and
ignorant, and have been waiting their whole lives for the k00k to rescue
them from intellectual darkness.
Write a self-published book and claim it a success. Bonus points for
comparing it to "Mein Kampf" and/or the Bible.
Declare yourself equal to a deity of your choice.
Claim that you've come from other planets.
Claim thousands of past lives.
Frothing complaints carry far more weight when you send them from
"legal@" some domain.
Nothing strikes terror into the hearts of your detractors more than
telling them that you're archiving their messages for possible use in
the future.
Never forget that everyone else posting to Usenet is a paid
disinformation agent looking to discredit you.
Usenet is governed by US law. If a poster in Romania killfiles you, he's
obviously violating your 1st Amendment rights and can be sued.
Every news admin in the world hangs out in NANAU, and they're just dying
to nuke the account of that meanyhead who just called you "fucknozzle".
Drop 'em a line - that's what they're there for, after all.
AUK will be closed down. Just you wait and see.
They've nuked hundreds of accounts in the name of free speech and
*yours* will be next.
The k00k will, without any trace of irony, lie, manipulate, impersonate,
censor, and declare themselves powerful in ways ranging from the ability
to have an account shut down to being God Herself, in order to convince
people that they are not liars, manipulators, censors, or insane.
Abuse women while telling how many hundreds you've loved. Nevermind that
you're one ugly motherf..ker and that there were 30,000 femininas that
thought you were a scumbag with bad teeth.
Remember that your ko0ky klaims are 'facts', and that 'facts' do not
require proof.
Do not neglect to poast your responses to forums that the originator
doesn't read. This will make the people in that forum very impressed
with how you tear him to shreds without him being able to respond. They
like it even better if you are off-topic for that forum.
Keep in mind that lack of evidence supporting your konspiracy theory
actually _is_ evidence, of how effective the konspiracy is in hiding.
(06-Oct-05) When spanked, always retreat to the safety of the Ad
Hominem.
(04-Aug-2005) When spanked mercilessly for days on end, proving with
each poast just what an illiterate and ignorant fool you are, ALWAYS
claim ownership of [person(s),froup(s)]. This works on so many levels.
It inspires dread in your opponents that they will no longer be able to
poast in their home froup and that they will eventually have to pay
rent, to name just two.
Any problems with your poasts are the fault of the konspirators, who are
trying to stop you from preventing the extinction of humanity.
Konspiracies that are able to subvert whole governments are always unable
to silence konspiracy ko0ks.
The entire United States government is willing to spend millions of
dollars for the sole purpose of harassing you.
Hollywood is making movies based on your personal life.
Do not consult psychiatrists or other mental health professionals. They
are part of the konspiracy, and will sedate you and lock you away and
keep you drugged if you tell them the truth.
Numerology and Astrology are respectable sciences and are useful for
proving your case.
Everyone is Tim Hill, or David Green, or...
There is a fine line between trolling and kookery. Find that line and
cross it repeatedly. When you are killfiled and/or LARTed for net.abuse
as a result, claim victory. If you lose multiple accounts, this merely
proves that you are indeed a world-class troll, with a black-belt in
manipulation.
If you respond to every post someone else makes, they're obsessed. If
they respond to less than 1% of your posts, they're even more obsessed.
Publishing people's real names, addresses, and phone numbers when
there's no other way for you to come out of a flamewar with any dignity
is cool, and proves that you are a master of secret internet information
stores, and absolutely not to be f.cked with.
Everyone is out to get you. You can put a stop to this by telling
everyone that they're out to get you at every available opportunity.
You are the only sane one.
Those that give you a hard time about morally bankrupt things you
yourself admit to are just persecutioners of the new inquisition.
Yelling in all caps and cursing at your detractors is debate. Your
detractors laughing at you with sarcastic remarks is obvious anger and
jealousy.
If doing something results in the loss of your account, legal hassles,
or blunt trauma injury, do it again. It always works better the second
time.
Asterisks, lots and lots of Asterisks.
Poking holes in kookscreed is stalking, and is a felony.
K00ks LOVE to "connect the dots". They are, of course, dots that only
the k00k can see.
"They laughed at Einstein, too!"

...with thanks to Aratzio, Dr. Flonkenstein, Dan Baldwin, Cujo, CJ
Osterwald, Jade, Bookman, and John Henry, of AUK. Meow. Original thread
at http://tinyurl.com/3fsho - some posts may not appear due to
x-no-archive headers. The spelling mistakes are intentional, dolt.

Chuck Stamford - 05 Jul 2008 18:23 GMT
>> "Kadaitcha Man" wrote...
>>> Chuck Stamford, ye dish-eared caitiff recreant, dissembling harlot, thou
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
> grammatical advice. Mind you, I'm not saying I never make typos, but I
> tend to catch them.

I'll accept "sloppy typist", but not your idea there's any connection
between being a sloppy typist and knowing or not knowing correct English
grammar; and there's absolutley NO excuse for what "Kadaitcha Man" does.
None at all.  Reading his posts is like watching a wounded viper writhe.

Chuck Stamford
Kadaitcha Man - 06 Jul 2008 00:46 GMT
Chuck Stamford, ye swag-bellied odd worm, thou art a frantic fool,
hiding thy better jests in blunt behaviour, ye conveyed:

>>> "Kadaitcha Man" wrote...
>>>> Chuck Stamford, ye dish-eared caitiff recreant, dissembling harlot,
[quoted text clipped - 56 lines]
>
> Chuck Stamford

> ...correct English grammar; and there's...

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH! LMFAO@YOU

Signature

alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]

Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member: Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Official Overseer of Kooks & Trolls in 24hoursupport.helpdesk

Member of:
  Usenet Ruiner List
  Top a.sholes on the Net List
  Most hated usenetizens of all time List
  Cog in the AUK Hate Machine List

Find me on Google Maps: 24°39'47.13"S, 134°4'20.18"E

Join me for dinner. I'm cooking cooked enough chicken entrails and
banana seasoning garnished with shot to ribbons mackerel gut, served in
a cooling double boiler containing medium cooked potato, minced remnants
of brain, pork and sea slug, phlegm, a side of red deer spleen and a
gallon of squirrel vaginal secretions.

Dr. House - 06 Jul 2008 01:25 GMT
On Jul 5, 4:46 pm, "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nos...@gmail.com>
wrote:

[...]
> Join me for dinner. I'm cooking cooked enough chicken entrails and
> banana seasoning garnished with shot to ribbons mackerel gut, served in
> a cooling double boiler containing medium cooked potato, minced remnants
> of brain, pork and sea slug, phlegm, a side of red deer spleen . . .

Most people just call that "frankfurters".  Tastes great served in a
bun with mustard, relish, diced onion and ketchup.  Add chili and it's
even better.

House
The Secretary of HomIntern - 06 Jul 2008 06:12 GMT
> "Porsche Monkey For Life" wrote...
>>> "Kadaitcha Man" wrote...
[quoted text clipped - 53 lines]
> grammar; and there's absolutley NO excuse for what "Kadaitcha Man" does.
> None at all.  Reading his posts is like watching a wounded viper writhe.

What K-Man does is turn your brains inside-out and cause you to foam about
it. He's very, VERY good at it.

Signature

________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! "The personal _is_ political."
Bent Depraved N. Deviant Cock-Smoker, Esq., Superfaggot
COOSN-029-06-71069; Usenet Ruiner #5; Official Chung Demon
Most Hated Usenetizen of All Time #13; Top a.shole #3; Lits Slut #16
Gutter Chix0r #17; BowTie's Spuriously Accused Pedo Photographer #4
AUK Psycho & Felon #21; Parrot & Zombie #2
Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
Rotate email munge 13 times to get real addy
"The moral of the story is: Kill the parents kill the children."

"What a lame copycat you are." -- the PorchMonkey4Life, posting as "The
Secretary of HomIntern", in MID: <UkdTh.2573$Z66.747@trnddc06>,
re-defines irony yet again.

Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of the PorchMonkey4Life
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/

"Stupidity excuses nothing.  It's only a reason...." -- Phxbrd
Old politicalcompass.org:
Economic Left/Right: -7.63 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.38
New political compass:
Economic Left/Right: -6.75 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.67
Odd. I seem to be swaying.

"The whining has just begun." -- John Wentzky, in Message-ID:
<Ie2Qe.8199$wb5.1083@bignews1.bellsouth.net>

Killfiled by: directory; Anim8rfsk
"It's not nice to misrepresent Mother Nature."
http://www.lowgenius.net/kookway.htm
TEH WAY OF THE K00K
Never learn from your mistakes.
Always practice your mistakes; you may get them right.
Always pick on those smarter and tougher than you.
Always believe that only you know the TRVTH.
Never allow logic or reason get in the way of a good k00k.
When being overwhelmed by logic and reason: k00ksuit!
If you are going to be wrong, do it at the top of your lungs.
When caught in a lie: LIE!
When in doubt: Order the Crab Won Ton
Plagiarism is your friend. Use it.
Whenever contradicted; morph, start calling people names, and make false
accusations. Include the children of your target in your allegations,
even if they don't have any.
(06-Jun-05) When nobody else will listen, post to your own fan group.
(06-Jun-05) Obviously, since you have your own fan group, this must mean
that you have fans. Post prolifically to your fan group - you wouldn't
want to disappoint them!
(10-May-2005)Everyone reads usenet. Approval here means approval
everywhere.
Post numerous blank posts, or posts containing only a message id.
Post numerous copy&paste web articles from crackerpot websites.
Never forget to call kookologists "k00ks."
If there are several, call them "sockpuppets" too
When all else fails, accuse various and sundry kookologists of e-mailing
viruses to you.  This is a sure-fire method of garnering sympathy and
ensuring that the General Public will always see things your way.  An
especially effective sub-strategy here is to accuse them of infecting
you with the 'Sasser' worm via e-mail.
Quote notorious scientists or writers - it makes it look as if they
approve the drivel you are writing!
(9-Jul-05) Anytime your computer is infected with a virus, bogged down
by spyware, attacked over your internet connection, or otherwise suffers
from preventable problems, government agencies are responsible and are
trying to silence you and are monitoring your computer files.
Ignore all traffic signs and feel free to trespass, you don't have to
obey any rules.
Scare your enemies with lawsuits, police escorts and whines.
Always back up your empty (albeit noisy) threats with phony LARTs, false
police reports, and harassing letters to the FBI and other gubbermint
agencies.
Be vigilant in your redundancy. The more you repeat yourself, the more
likely others will believe you!
If you can't find anyone as crazy as yourself to support you in the
flamewars you start with the normal population, create sock puppets and
use anonymous remailers that shamelessly hang on every word you write.
(17-Mar-05) When dealing with law enforcement, remember that it is they
who have the problem, not you.  Be sure to inform them of this at every
available opportunity, as they will surely appreciate your constructive
criticism.  Be sure to make them aware that YOU KNOW YOUR RIGHTS!  ("The
cops like that, when people know their rights.  That way they don't have
to read them to you on the way to the station." - George Carlin)
The more your fake personalities adulate you, the more respect you'll
get!
When confronted with a reality that you don't like: Announce loudly
that you are departing, never to return as long as there's an Internet.
Come back in three or four days and claim you were drunk, hacked,
abducted by alience, or forged. Alternately you can just not even
mention your prior departure, and if anyone asks you about it, either
ignore them or respond with something along the lines of "YOUR NOT THE
BOSS OF ME!  *PLONK*!" People really know you mean business then.
Always remain clueproof.
(20-Mar-05) Anyone who does not believe that you are the reincarnation
of [$DEITY_OR_PROPHET] is obviously an infidel lacking in faith whose
soul in in peril of everlasting damnation.
When responding to one line challenges, post paragraphs of rants and
screed in response.
Incoherency is not a roadblock to poasting.
Neither is illiteracy.
Delusions poasted often enough become fact.
Claim you will destroy <insert newsfroup> for attacking you.
When spnaked, send cmsg for Fanboi newsfroup(s).
Find your Lame, Use your Lame, Be your Lame!
Post Edit when the TRVTH hurts.
Always sneck the offending newsfroups.
Always poast pictures of yourself so you can be admired in all your k00ky
glory.
Always accuse others of the very acts you are guilty of.
Post lots of boasts about your high IQ and incredible talents.
(20-Mar-05) If you repeat a lie often enough, it becomes the truth.
Anybody who fails to understand this is engaged in a deliberate campaign
of misinformation and character assassination.
Always <plonk> somebody just before replying the plonkee!
The k00k considers itself the most intelligent person in any
conversation, possibly on the planet. Other people are benighted and
ignorant, and have been waiting their whole lives for the k00k to rescue
them from intellectual darkness.
Write a self-published book and claim it a success. Bonus points for
comparing it to "Mein Kampf" and/or the Bible.
Declare yourself equal to a deity of your choice.
Claim that you've come from other planets.
Claim thousands of past lives.
Frothing complaints carry far more weight when you send them from
"legal@" some domain.
Nothing strikes terror into the hearts of your detractors more than
telling them that you're archiving their messages for possible use in
the future.
Never forget that everyone else posting to Usenet is a paid
disinformation agent looking to discredit you.
Usenet is governed by US law. If a poster in Romania killfiles you, he's
obviously violating your 1st Amendment rights and can be sued.
Every news admin in the world hangs out in NANAU, and they're just dying
to nuke the account of that meanyhead who just called you "fucknozzle".
Drop 'em a line - that's what they're there for, after all.
AUK will be closed down. Just you wait and see.
They've nuked hundreds of accounts in the name of free speech and
*yours* will be next.
The k00k will, without any trace of irony, lie, manipulate, impersonate,
censor, and declare themselves powerful in ways ranging from the ability
to have an account shut down to being God Herself, in order to convince
people that they are not liars, manipulators, censors, or insane.
Abuse women while telling how many hundreds you've loved. Nevermind that
you're one ugly motherf..ker and that there were 30,000 femininas that
thought you were a scumbag with bad teeth.
Remember that your ko0ky klaims are 'facts', and that 'facts' do not
require proof.
Do not neglect to poast your responses to forums that the originator
doesn't read. This will make the people in that forum very impressed
with how you tear him to shreds without him being able to respond. They
like it even better if you are off-topic for that forum.
Keep in mind that lack of evidence supporting your konspiracy theory
actually _is_ evidence, of how effective the konspiracy is in hiding.
(06-Oct-05) When spanked, always retreat to the safety of the Ad
Hominem.
(04-Aug-2005) When spanked mercilessly for days on end, proving with
each poast just what an illiterate and ignorant fool you are, ALWAYS
claim ownership of [person(s),froup(s)]. This works on so many levels.
It inspires dread in your opponents that they will no longer be able to
poast in their home froup and that they will eventually have to pay
rent, to name just two.
Any problems with your poasts are the fault of the konspirators, who are
trying to stop you from preventing the extinction of humanity.
Konspiracies that are able to subvert whole governments are always unable
to silence konspiracy ko0ks.
The entire United States government is willing to spend millions of
dollars for the sole purpose of harassing you.
Hollywood is making movies based on your personal life.
Do not consult psychiatrists or other mental health professionals. They
are part of the konspiracy, and will sedate you and lock you away and
keep you drugged if you tell them the truth.
Numerology and Astrology are respectable sciences and are useful for
proving your case.
Everyone is Tim Hill, or David Green, or...
There is a fine line between trolling and kookery. Find that line and
cross it repeatedly. When you are killfiled and/or LARTed for net.abuse
as a result, claim victory. If you lose multiple accounts, this merely
proves that you are indeed a world-class troll, with a black-belt in
manipulation.
If you respond to every post someone else makes, they're obsessed. If
they respond to less than 1% of your posts, they're even more obsessed.
Publishing people's real names, addresses, and phone numbers when
there's no other way for you to come out of a flamewar with any dignity
is cool, and proves that you are a master of secret internet information
stores, and absolutely not to be f.cked with.
Everyone is out to get you. You can put a stop to this by telling
everyone that they're out to get you at every available opportunity.
You are the only sane one.
Those that give you a hard time about morally bankrupt things you
yourself admit to are just persecutioners of the new inquisition.
Yelling in all caps and cursing at your detractors is debate. Your
detractors laughing at you with sarcastic remarks is obvious anger and
jealousy.
If doing something results in the loss of your account, legal hassles,
or blunt trauma injury, do it again. It always works better the second
time.
Asterisks, lots and lots of Asterisks.
Poking holes in kookscreed is stalking, and is a felony.
K00ks LOVE to "connect the dots". They are, of course, dots that only
the k00k can see.
"They laughed at Einstein, too!"

...with thanks to Aratzio, Dr. Flonkenstein, Dan Baldwin, Cujo, CJ
Osterwald, Jade, Bookman, and John Henry, of AUK. Meow. Original thread
at http://tinyurl.com/3fsho - some posts may not appear due to
x-no-archive headers. The spelling mistakes are intentional, dolt.

Chuck Stamford - 06 Jul 2008 06:45 GMT
>> "Porsche Monkey For Life" wrote...
>>>> "Kadaitcha Man" wrote...
[quoted text clipped - 56 lines]
> What K-Man does is turn your brains inside-out and cause you to foam about
> it. He's very, VERY good at it.

Everyone is entitled to their own opinions.  He's yet to impress me except
with his bias and foul language, and that's not my impression of genius at
work.  I know people on the newsgroup I frequent who can't identify a
logical contradiction when faced with it who can do what I've seen him do so
far.
Kadaitcha Man - 06 Jul 2008 07:55 GMT
Chuck Stamford, ye bug-eyed crooked-pated old cuckoldy ram, o, were mine
eye bans into bullets turned, that in a rage I might shoot them at your
face, ye chin wagged:

>>> "Porsche Monkey For Life" wrote...
>>>>> "Kadaitcha Man" wrote...
[quoted text clipped - 63 lines]
> with his bias and foul language, and that's not my impression of genius at
> work.

It's a usenet-induced cliché; I swear, you miss the point by focussing on
the cusswords and start calling my intelligence into question, sort of like
you not being able to see the forest for the trees. Then when you least
expect it, I stick two fingers up your nose, one up each nostril, pull
whatever it is you are pleased to call your brain out and hold it up for
public ridicule.

> He's yet to impress me except with his bias and foul language, and that's
> not my impression of genius at work.

As you can see, the trick works.

> I know people on the newsgroup I frequent who can't identify a logical
> contradiction when faced with it who can do what I've seen him do so far.

Now, see how well the trick works? I have impeccable logic skills, far above
and beyond the dizzying heights that you cannot even dream about. Your
trepanning is drawing near.

Signature

Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member: Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Official Overseer of Kooks & Trolls in 24hoursupport.helpdesk

Chuck Stamford - 06 Jul 2008 10:14 GMT
> Chuck Stamford, ye bug-eyed crooked-pated old cuckoldy ram, o, were mine
> eye bans into bullets turned, that in a rage I might shoot them at your
[quoted text clipped - 75 lines]
> It's a usenet-induced cliché; I swear, you miss the point by focussing on
> the cusswords and start calling my intelligence into question...

You so full of yourself you can't see straight.  People with real
intelligence don't act like you do.  They have better things to do with
their time than hang around newsgroups making a horse's a.s out of
themselves.

You're damaged goods.  I hope you find healing for that hole in your soul
you love to put on display and dare anyone to notice.
Chuck Stamford - 06 Jul 2008 10:36 GMT
Chuck Stamford, ye shameless young quat, false of heart, light of ear,
bloody of hand, hog in sloth, fox in stealth, wolf in greediness, dog in
madness, lion in prey, ye informed:

> Instead of talking to your plants, if you yelled at them would they
> still grow....and would they be be troubled and insecure?
captdan@aol.com - 08 Jul 2008 17:55 GMT
> Chuck Stamford, ye shameless young quat, false of heart, light of ear,
> bloody of hand, hog in sloth, fox in stealth, wolf in greediness, dog in
> madness, lion in prey, ye informed:
>
>>Instead of talking to your plants, if you yelled at them would they
>>still grow....and would they be be troubled and insecure?

I don't know, but people would look at you funny.
Kadaitcha Man - 06 Jul 2008 10:39 GMT
Chuck Stamford, ye saucy strange serpent, they were the most needless
creatures living, ye yackety-yakked:

>> Chuck Stamford, ye bug-eyed crooked-pated old cuckoldy ram, o, were mine
>> eye bans into bullets turned, that in a rage I might shoot them at your
[quoted text clipped - 83 lines]
> their time than hang around newsgroups making a horse's a.s out of
> themselves.

So, what are you doing hanging around newsgroups?

Autoflame Grade AAA+++

> You're damaged goods.  I hope you find healing for that hole in your soul
> you love to put on display and dare anyone to notice.

lol

You poor baby.

Signature

alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]

Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member: Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Official Overseer of Kooks & Trolls in 24hoursupport.helpdesk

Member of:
  Usenet Ruiner List
  Top a.sholes on the Net List
  Most hated usenetizens of all time List
  Cog in the AUK Hate Machine List

Find me on Google Maps: 24°39'47.13"S, 134°4'20.18"E

Join me for dinner. I'm cooking debilitated spider breast and octopus
adenoid dressing next to ghoulish horse flies and lemon garnish, dished
up in a circulating mug chock full of big hodgepodge of bamboo and
cauliflower in dog pee, a side of needlefish lung and a tumbler of
vaginal discharge.

Chuck Stamford - 04 Jul 2008 05:35 GMT
>> What is the plural of "Mini Cooper S" ?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Mini Cooper S'

I'm going to guess Mini Coopers S.
Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al) - 04 Jul 2008 05:51 GMT
> > What is the plural of "Mini Cooper S" ?
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Mini Cooper S'

Cooper S Minis

Al
roymock@gmail.com - 05 Jul 2008 02:28 GMT
> > What is the plural of "Mini Cooper S" ?
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Mini Cooper S'

"Minis Cooper S"       came to mind

"Mini" being the thingy; and "Cooper S" the edition/branding/model/
type etc

Cheers.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.