Car Forum / MINI / September 2008
PROOF! Obama economic advisors responsible for Fannie / Freddie financial disaster
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Dave U. Random - 19 Sep 2008 01:58 GMT http://overthehilloracles.wordpress.com/2008/09/09/the-obama- fannie-freddie-connection/
Obama’s two economic advisors are former Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac CEO’s who may have pulled strings to give Obama a “heads up” on the recent government bail-out plan. Washington Prowler has the story:
When President George W. Bush nominated Henry Paulson to serve as Treasury Secretary, Republicans raised a red flag that Paulson, who, along with his wife, has strong ties to the Democrat party, would not be an honest broker with Republicans. That seems to have been borne out, with sources inside of Treasury reporting that Paulson briefed Sen. Barack Obama and his campaign advisers on the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bailout plan before offering such a briefing to the McCain campaign.
In fact, the McCain campaign had sought a similar briefing several days ago as word spread that a bailout plan was to be unveiled and had been turned down by Paulson’s senior staff.
The next question is: Why was the Obama campaign so keen on getting advanced word about the bailout?
“They have a huge problem with the mortgage and housing market story, and everyone is missing it,” says a Republican political media consultant with ties to the Obama campaign due to the bipartisan nature of the firm he does work with.
“You look at Obama’s economic advisers, the guys he has counted on from day one and who have raised him a ton — and I mean a ton — of money: Franklin Raines and Jim Johnson, both of them are waist to neck deep in the mortgage debacle.”
Both Raines and Johnson have served as CEO of Fannie Mae, with Raines taking over from Johnson. Both are key political and economic advisers to Obama.
“How can Obama go out with a straight face and saw it was Republicans who made this mess, when it is his key advisers who ran the agencies that made the big mess what it is?” says a Democrat House member who supported Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton. “It’s his people who are responsible for what may well be the single largest government bailout in history. And every single one of them made millions off the collapse that are lining Obama’s campaign coffers. If the McCain campaign lets this one go, they deserve to lose.”
It isn’t just Fannie Mae where Obama has a problem. Another close political adviser, in fact the one man responsible for rallying support for Obama early on among Congressional Democrats, is Rep. Rahm Emanuel, who served on the Board of Directors for Freddie Mac after leaving the Clinton White House. According to Freddie Mac insiders, Emanuel during his time on the board opposed every reform proposed by the Bush Administration that would have impacted Freddie and Fannie Mae.
Emanuel claimed to be neutral in the primary race between the wife of his old boss and his longtime Chicago acquaintance, Obama. But the chairman of the House Democratic Caucus, who would be first in line for the vacated Senate seat of Obama should he win the presidency, quickly dumped Clinton when it was clear Obama had a head of steam for the nomination.
“We ought to be able to — rightly — hang the Fannie and Freddie scandal around the neck of Obama, if they can get out in front,” says a House Republican. “Middle-class folks’ mortgages are probably safe, but the American taxpayer will also be paying for this scandal for years to come.”
Possibly this connection may (or may not) inspire the Clinton’s to join the rush to the November 4 finish line. After all — Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were created under Clinton’s administration.
It’s possible President Bush could have avoided some of this by his HUD secretary, Mel Martinez, undoing Andrew Cuomo’s rules. But can you imagine the grief he would have gotten for making houses harder to buy, especially for those on the lower rungs of the economic ladder, with the likes of Barney Frank and Paul Krugman on the opposing side?
This was the perfect liberal operation: The righteous cause of home ownership for those on the lower rungs of the economic ladder. Pockets padded for fellow cronies. And the blame for the inevitable crisis going to Republicans. Perfect. Bill Clinton is a genius.
Deliver us from any more displays of Clinton’s genius. Include in that display the election of Barack Obama — expecially if Obama’s economic programs are being master-minded by Clinton cronies.
hhc314@yahoo.com - 20 Sep 2008 07:44 GMT On Sep 18, 8:58 pm, Dave U. Random <anonym...@anonymitaet-im- inter.net> wrote:
> http://overthehilloracles.wordpress.com/2008/09/09/the-obama- > fannie-freddie-connection/ [quoted text clipped - 88 lines] > Obama’s economic programs are being master-minded by Clinton > cronies. It is a strange situation, but having lived through the times, I have to place the blame on the liberals, including the Clinton administration and slightly earlier.
Prior to the liberal motivation for the relaxation in mortgate requirements, given that you had the requisite 20% down payment, you could likely get a mortgate on a home roughly equal to 3-times your annual income. This means that if you had $6,000 in cash for a down payment, earned $20,000 or more a year, a home costing $60,000 might be in your reach. Other factors were factored into your mortgage qualification, including things like monthy expenses that might detract to keep you from making your mortgage payments (food, electricity, heat, car payments, etc.) Unless qualified, young couples live with their parents or in a rented appartment.
It is only human nature to want every family to own their own home, but brainless efforts to make this happen, and the selfishness of mortgage firms have been responsible for the the hardships that result when mortgage qualifications are excessively relaxed. Today we find ourselves living in the fantasy worls where a young couple is trying to pay the mortgage on a $600,000 home, with an annual income of less than $90,000. You can focus the blame on either the naive buyers, or the greedy bankers, but the fact is simply that the regulators were asleep at the switch. Now there is no way the the govenment can bail out the naive buyers,and even bailing out the mortage banks is for obvious reasons problematic. Still, like international displomacy, we have to get in bed with players that we would avoid even meeting in social circles, simply for survival. This is similar to our relationship with Russia and a few other nations during WWII.
Nuff said.
Harry C,
p.s., If you don't remember the times I have described above, or have never studied them, please don't vote in November. If the President of the United States is determined by his popularity with the media, his empty arm waving promises and not past accompliments services to our country, My vote will be for someone that put our country before his own self-interest and has a history of accomplishing good things for our country and its people; Not someone campaigning simply to do so in the future if elected.
Country first, self second!
Harry C.
TomBoston191 - 20 Sep 2008 20:55 GMT > On Sep 18, 8:58 pm, Dave U. Random <anonym...@anonymitaet-im- > [quoted text clipped - 138 lines] > > Harry C. Johnson (a Clinton appointee) left in 1998 About the time Sarah Palin was a cute little weathergirl.
Raines (a Clinton appointee) left in 2004 By which time Sarah was the mayor of a town with a population that would fit inside the bleachers at Fenway.
Fannie and Freddie were taken over in 2008. 4 YEARS after Bush appointees started calling the shots. I'm kind of surprised it took that long... And in 2008, apparently Sarah is qualified to be the Vice President.
Screen Barret - 21 Sep 2008 16:17 GMT > On Sep 18, 8:58 pm, Dave U. Random <anonym...@anonymitaet-im- > [quoted text clipped - 138 lines] > > Harry C. If you listen to the idiot Harry C you will be worse than him. Why? Fannie Mae and Freddie are the failure product of Bush's party, his party lied about rosy economy, that's what caused every one to get hyper about their phony economy. Sellers think the Fed will increase the interest rate, alluring the public to buy at low interest, they feed the public with Adjustable rate. Most Americans are dumb, they don't calculate what the fixed rate payment will be, so there you go. It came down to the stupidity of the public and his BUSH (The genius scammer).
Bill Kawalec - 21 Sep 2008 17:48 GMT > If you listen to the idiot Harry C you will be worse than him. Why? > Fannie Mae and Freddie are the failure product of Bush's party, no way in hell can you even begin to spin that as truth.
his party
> lied about rosy economy, that's what caused every one to get hyper about > their phony economy. Sellers think the Fed will increase the interest > rate, alluring the public to buy at low interest, they feed the public > with Adjustable rate. Most Americans are dumb, they don't calculate what > the fixed rate payment will be, so there you go. It came down to the > stupidity of the public and his BUSH (The genius scammer). richard - 21 Sep 2008 20:21 GMT > > If you listen to the idiot Harry C you will be worse than him. Why? > > Fannie Mae and Freddie are the failure product of Bush's party, > > no way in hell can you even begin to spin that as truth. Sure, we all know Repukes are dipshit because you consistently blame others for your own failure.
Fred Kasner - 22 Sep 2008 23:31 GMT > On Sep 18, 8:58 pm, Dave U. Random <anonym...@anonymitaet-im- > inter.net> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 137 lines] > > Harry C. OK, Harry! I'll really take you at your word on that and place my country first as I always have and vote for the Democrat to prevent the country acquiring a reactionary Supreme Court majority and a reversion to the beautiful days of Warren Harding. Country first by all means! FK
|
|
|