Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / MINI / September 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

PROOF!  Obama economic advisors responsible for Fannie / Freddie financial disaster

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Dave U. Random - 19 Sep 2008 01:58 GMT
http://overthehilloracles.wordpress.com/2008/09/09/the-obama-
fannie-freddie-connection/

Obama’s two economic advisors are former Fannie Mae and Freddie
Mac CEO’s who may have pulled strings to give Obama a “heads up”
on the recent government bail-out plan.  Washington Prowler has
the story:

When President George W. Bush nominated Henry Paulson to serve
as Treasury Secretary, Republicans raised a red flag that
Paulson, who, along with his wife, has strong ties to the
Democrat party, would not be an honest broker with Republicans.
That seems to have been borne out, with sources inside of
Treasury reporting that Paulson briefed Sen. Barack Obama and
his campaign advisers on the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bailout
plan before offering such a briefing to the McCain campaign.

In fact, the McCain campaign had sought a similar briefing
several days ago as word spread that a bailout plan was to be
unveiled and had been turned down by Paulson’s senior staff.

The next question is: Why was the Obama campaign so keen on
getting advanced word about the bailout?

“They have a huge problem with the mortgage and housing market
story, and everyone is missing it,” says a Republican political
media consultant with ties to the Obama campaign due to the
bipartisan nature of the firm he does work with.

“You look at Obama’s economic advisers, the guys he has counted
on from day one and who have raised him a ton — and I mean a ton
— of money: Franklin Raines and Jim Johnson, both of them are
waist to neck deep in the mortgage debacle.”

Both Raines and Johnson have served as CEO of Fannie Mae, with
Raines taking over from Johnson. Both are key political and
economic advisers to Obama.

“How can Obama go out with a straight face and saw it was
Republicans who made this mess, when it is his key advisers who
ran the agencies that made the big mess what it is?” says a
Democrat House member who supported Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton.
“It’s his people who are responsible for what may well be the
single largest government bailout in history. And every single
one of them made millions off the collapse that are lining
Obama’s campaign coffers. If the McCain campaign lets this one
go, they deserve to lose.”

It isn’t just Fannie Mae where Obama has a problem. Another
close political adviser, in fact the one man responsible for
rallying support for Obama early on among Congressional
Democrats, is Rep. Rahm Emanuel, who served on the Board of
Directors for Freddie Mac after leaving the Clinton White House.
According to Freddie Mac insiders, Emanuel during his time on
the board opposed every reform proposed by the Bush
Administration that would have impacted Freddie and Fannie Mae.

Emanuel claimed to be neutral in the primary race between the
wife of his old boss and his longtime Chicago acquaintance,
Obama. But the chairman of the House Democratic Caucus, who
would be first in line for the vacated Senate seat of Obama
should he win the presidency, quickly dumped Clinton when it was
clear Obama had a head of steam for the nomination.

“We ought to be able to — rightly — hang the Fannie and Freddie
scandal around the neck of Obama, if they can get out in front,”
says a House Republican. “Middle-class folks’ mortgages are
probably safe, but the American taxpayer will also be paying for
this scandal for years to come.”

Possibly this connection may (or may not) inspire the Clinton’s
to join the rush to the November 4 finish line.  After all —
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were created under Clinton’s
administration.

It’s possible President Bush could have avoided some of this by
his HUD secretary, Mel Martinez, undoing Andrew Cuomo’s rules.  
But can you imagine the grief he would have gotten for making
houses harder to buy, especially for those on the lower rungs of
the economic ladder, with the likes of Barney Frank and Paul
Krugman on the opposing side?

This was the perfect liberal operation:  The righteous cause of
home ownership for those on the lower rungs of the economic
ladder.  Pockets padded for fellow cronies.  And the blame for
the inevitable crisis going to Republicans.  Perfect.  Bill
Clinton is a genius.

Deliver us from any more displays of Clinton’s genius.   Include
in that display the election of Barack Obama — expecially if
Obama’s economic programs are being master-minded by Clinton
cronies.
hhc314@yahoo.com - 20 Sep 2008 07:44 GMT
On Sep 18, 8:58 pm, Dave U. Random <anonym...@anonymitaet-im-
inter.net> wrote:
> http://overthehilloracles.wordpress.com/2008/09/09/the-obama-
> fannie-freddie-connection/
[quoted text clipped - 88 lines]
> Obama’s economic programs are being master-minded by Clinton
> cronies.

It is a strange situation, but having lived through the times, I have
to place the blame on the liberals, including the Clinton
administration and slightly earlier.

Prior to the liberal motivation for the relaxation in mortgate
requirements, given that you had the requisite 20% down payment, you
could likely get a mortgate on a home roughly equal to 3-times your
annual income.  This means that if you had $6,000 in cash for a down
payment, earned $20,000 or more a year, a home costing $60,000 might
be in your reach. Other factors were factored into your mortgage
qualification, including things like monthy expenses that might
detract to keep you from making your mortgage payments (food,
electricity, heat, car payments, etc.)  Unless qualified, young
couples live with their parents or in a rented appartment.

It is only human nature to want every family to own their own home,
but brainless efforts to make this happen, and the selfishness of
mortgage firms have been responsible for the the hardships that result
when mortgage qualifications are excessively relaxed. Today we find
ourselves living in the fantasy worls where a young couple is trying
to pay the mortgage on a $600,000 home, with an annual income of less
than $90,000.  You can focus the blame on either the naive buyers, or
the greedy bankers, but the fact is simply that the regulators were
asleep at the switch. Now there is no way the the govenment can bail
out the naive buyers,and even bailing out the mortage banks is for
obvious reasons problematic.  Still, like international displomacy, we
have to get in bed with players that we would avoid even meeting in
social circles, simply for survival. This is similar to our
relationship with Russia and a few other nations during WWII.

Nuff said.

Harry C,

p.s.,  If you don't remember the times I have described above, or have
never studied them, please don't vote in November.  If the President
of the United States is determined by his popularity with the media,
his empty arm waving promises and not past accompliments services to
our country, My vote will be for someone that put our country before
his own self-interest and has a history of accomplishing good things
for our country and its people; Not someone campaigning simply to do
so in the future if elected.

Country first, self second!

Harry C.
TomBoston191 - 20 Sep 2008 20:55 GMT
> On Sep 18, 8:58 pm, Dave U. Random <anonym...@anonymitaet-im-
>
[quoted text clipped - 138 lines]
>
> Harry C.

Johnson (a Clinton appointee) left in 1998
About the time Sarah Palin was a cute little weathergirl.

Raines (a Clinton appointee) left in 2004
By which time Sarah was the mayor of a town with a population that
would fit inside the bleachers at Fenway.

Fannie and Freddie were taken over in 2008.
4 YEARS after Bush appointees started calling the shots.
I'm kind of surprised it took that long...
And in 2008, apparently Sarah is qualified to be the Vice President.
Screen Barret - 21 Sep 2008 16:17 GMT
> On Sep 18, 8:58 pm, Dave U. Random <anonym...@anonymitaet-im-
>
[quoted text clipped - 138 lines]
>
> Harry C.

If you listen to the idiot Harry C you will be worse than him. Why?
Fannie Mae and Freddie are the failure product of Bush's party, his party
lied about rosy economy, that's what caused every one to get hyper about
their phony economy.  Sellers think the Fed will increase the interest
rate, alluring the public to buy at low interest, they feed the public
with Adjustable rate.  Most Americans are dumb, they don't calculate what
the fixed rate payment will be, so there you go.  It came down to the
stupidity of the public and his BUSH (The genius scammer).
Bill Kawalec - 21 Sep 2008 17:48 GMT
> If you listen to the idiot Harry C you will be worse than him. Why?
> Fannie Mae and Freddie are the failure product of Bush's party,

no way in hell can you even begin to spin that as truth.

his party
> lied about rosy economy, that's what caused every one to get hyper about
> their phony economy.  Sellers think the Fed will increase the interest
> rate, alluring the public to buy at low interest, they feed the public
> with Adjustable rate.  Most Americans are dumb, they don't calculate what
> the fixed rate payment will be, so there you go.  It came down to the
> stupidity of the public and his BUSH (The genius scammer).
richard - 21 Sep 2008 20:21 GMT
> > If you listen to the idiot Harry C you will be worse than him. Why?
> > Fannie Mae and Freddie are the failure product of Bush's party,
>
> no way in hell can you even begin to spin that as truth.

Sure, we all know Repukes are dipshit because you consistently blame
others for your own failure.
Fred Kasner - 22 Sep 2008 23:31 GMT
> On Sep 18, 8:58 pm, Dave U. Random <anonym...@anonymitaet-im-
> inter.net> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 137 lines]
>
> Harry C.

OK, Harry! I'll really take you at your word on that and place my
country first as I always have and vote for the Democrat to prevent the
country acquiring a reactionary Supreme Court majority and a reversion
to the beautiful days of Warren Harding. Country first by all means!
FK
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.